How to remove the require instance in Javascript.

2016-05-09 Thread Yonggang Luo
-- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a OSS project!

2016-05-09 Thread Emma Humphries
I want to point out that the bug in question had 48 Mozillians CC'ed on it, so any comments on the bug which are extraneous to the subject of the bug add noise to the signal. Comments are a place to make a case for a fix, but not indulging in a jeremiad if a decision is made not to fix. -- Emma

Shutdown leak detection - is there a better way?

2016-05-09 Thread Randell Jesup
I wrote the following in bug 1270308 comment 14, and thought it might be worth mentioning/discussing here. Not a new observation, of course, but perhaps worth thinking about. I should re-emphasize the effort that goes into making clean shutdown work without intermittent is a LOT of work for a

Re: Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a OSS project!

2016-05-09 Thread George Wright
On 05/09/2016 04:59 PM, Tobias B. Besemer wrote: But I'm pretty sure that it wouldn't take anymore long till Mozilla is on the ground... It seems a bit odd that you're using the "you will lose marketshare" argument in favour of your demands, but in the content process bug your demands

Re: Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a OSS project!

2016-05-09 Thread Tobias B. Besemer
K, I wait till Mozilla hit the bottom because marking my opinions to problems as "Offtopic" and removing my rights because I get p*ssed that my thinking about it is "off topic" is getting to much for me! But I'm pretty sure that it wouldn't take anymore long till Mozilla is on the ground...

Re: Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a OSS project!

2016-05-09 Thread Ryan VanderMeulen
On 5/9/2016 2:23 PM, Tobias B. Besemer wrote: Hi! Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a OSS Project! The same mistake made Oracle with OpenOffice! Now the project is almost death! Think Mozilla should find his way back to his roots! Would be nice, if some

Build System Project - Update from the last 2 weeks

2016-05-09 Thread David Burns
Below is a highlight of all work the build peers have done in the last 2 weeks as part of their work to modernise the build infrastructure. Since the last report[1] a large number of improvements have landed in Mozilla Central. We have been experimenting with making a global cache available to

Re: Intent to implement and ship: #rgba and #rrggbbaa color syntax in CSS

2016-05-09 Thread L. David Baron
On Monday 2016-05-09 11:42 -0700, Jet Villegas wrote: > Is this a follow-up, or are we prevented from parsing extended HTML color > attributes by some other invariant? Colors in HTML use a parsing algorithm that basically accepts all garbage, and people depend on that, so we're probably unable to

Re: Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a OSS project!

2016-05-09 Thread Tobias B. Besemer
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2016 20:54:44 UTC+2 schrieb Kyle Huey: > Because you are *still* (as of 10 minutes ago) removing the off-topic > labels that were applied to clearly off-topic comments I have temporarily > removed your editbugs permissions. > > - Kyle > > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Tobias

Re: Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a OSS project!

2016-05-09 Thread Tobias B. Besemer
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2016 20:33:11 UTC+2 schrieb Andrew McCreight: > Thank you for opening a discussion thread rather than posting more in the > bug. > > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Tobias B. Besemer wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go

Re: Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a OSS project!

2016-05-09 Thread Tobias B. Besemer
Same belongs to bug 1219672! https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1219672 If Mozilla still don't know that I sometimes give a rant, if thing go really wrong, but on the other side my rants were the reasons in the last 2,5 years, that Firfox was getting on Windows much better again, then

Re: Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a OSS project!

2016-05-09 Thread Kyle Huey
Because you are *still* (as of 10 minutes ago) removing the off-topic labels that were applied to clearly off-topic comments I have temporarily removed your editbugs permissions. - Kyle On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Tobias B. Besemer < tobias.bese...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > Ignoring

Re: Intent to implement and ship: #rgba and #rrggbbaa color syntax in CSS

2016-05-09 Thread Jet Villegas
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:35 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > I just landed a patch to implement the #rgba and #rrggbbaa syntax > for colors in CSS, > Nice! > It affects only colors specified in CSS, and not those specified in > HTML attributes. > > Is this a follow-up, or are

Re: Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a OSS project!

2016-05-09 Thread Andrew McCreight
Thank you for opening a discussion thread rather than posting more in the bug. On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Tobias B. Besemer < tobias.bese...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a > OSS Project! > The same mistake made

Re: Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a OSS project!

2016-05-09 Thread Mike Hoye
On 2016-05-09 2:23 PM, Tobias B. Besemer wrote: Think Mozilla should find his way back to his roots! Would be nice, if some people think about it! While reasonable people can disagree about policy decisions, Bugzilla has never been the right place to air those disagreements. - mhoye

Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a OSS project!

2016-05-09 Thread Tobias B. Besemer
Hi! Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a OSS Project! The same mistake made Oracle with OpenOffice! Now the project is almost death! Think Mozilla should find his way back to his roots! Would be nice, if some people think about it!

Re: Intent to implement and ship: DOMTokenList.prototype.supports

2016-05-09 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 5/8/16 10:18 PM, Karl Dubost wrote: I was wondering if it makes to add in the supports() list all keywords which have influences to the Chrome of browser, aka no effect on navigation context. That depends on what the goal is, obviously. * link rel="feed" has an effect on the chrome UI,

Re: Intent to ship: invalid values behave like "metadata", not "subtitles"

2016-05-09 Thread Simon Pieters
On Thu, 05 May 2016 15:36:30 +0200, Aryeh Gregor wrote: On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Florin Mezei wrote: Do you still intend to do some analysis to see whether this will be a problem in real life? We have somewhat of a history in shipping

[Firefox Desktop] Issues found: May 2nd to May 6th

2016-05-09 Thread Andrei Vaida
Hi everyone, Here's the list of new issues found and filed by the Desktop Release QA team last week, *May 2nd - May 6th* (week 18). Additional details on the team's priorities last week, as well as the plans for the current week are available at:

Re: Intent to implement and ship: #rgba and #rrggbbaa color syntax in CSS

2016-05-09 Thread Patrick Brosset
(cross posting to dev-developer-tools) I just filed the following bug for devtools support: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1271191 Right now, the devtools inspector panel displays CSS colors (in the Rules sidebar panel) as editable color swatches, and allows to convert between the