Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Automotive Working Group

2016-10-17 Thread Martin Thomson
This seems to be a more specific instance of WoT. As such, the goals are much clearer here. While some of the concerns with the WoT charter apply (security in particular!), here are a few additional observations: Exposing the level of information that they claim to want to expose needs more

W3C Proposed Recommendation: Media Source Extensions (MSE)

2016-10-17 Thread L. David Baron
A W3C Proposed Recommendation is available for the membership of W3C (including Mozilla) to vote on, before it proceeds to the final stage of being a W3C Recomendation: Media Source Extensions (MSE) W3C TR draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/media-source/ W3C Editor's draft:

Proposed W3C Charter: Automotive Working Group

2016-10-17 Thread L. David Baron
The W3C is proposing a new charter for: Automotive Working Group https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Oct/0003.html https://www.w3.org/2014/automotive/charter-2016.html Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through Monday, November 7. However, I

Proposed W3C Charter: Audio Working Group

2016-10-17 Thread L. David Baron
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: Audio Working Group https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Oct/.html https://www.w3.org/2011/audio/charter/audio-2016.html Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through Monday, October 31. However, I

Proposed W3C Charter: Second Screen Working Group

2016-10-17 Thread L. David Baron
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: Second Screen Working Group https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Sep/0011.html https://www.w3.org/2014/secondscreen/charter-2016.html Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through next Tuesday, October 25.

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web of Things Working Group

2016-10-17 Thread L. David Baron
The comments I submitted on the WoT charter are archived at: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2016Oct/0004.html -David On Friday 2016-10-14 15:03 +0100, Benjamin Francis wrote: > Hi David, > > We collected some feedback in a document >

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: HTML 5.1

2016-10-17 Thread L. David Baron
The comments submitted on HTML 5.1 are archived at: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2016Oct/0003.html -David On Thursday 2016-10-13 17:35 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote: > For the record, I have reviewed the HTML5.1 changes: > >

Re: Intent to make Form Autocomplete popups use richlistbox's instead of trees

2016-10-17 Thread Mike Conley
Resurrecting this old thread to let you all know that this autolanded last night, and (if all goes well) should merge to mozilla-central soon. Thanks to MattN for the reviews! Dirty details are in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1296638 On 20 August 2016 at 06:10, Gijs Kruitbosch

Re: Windows XP and Vista Long Term Support Plan

2016-10-17 Thread Peter Dolanjski
Thanks for taking the time to provide thorough feedback. 3) For Windows Vista, I don't see where the fire is. I realize that it has > a vastly smaller user base, but it is close to Window 7 code base and API > wise. I'm sure the engineering team can probably provide a more detailed response on