On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:15 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
On Friday 2015-01-30 11:14 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:32 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org
wrote:
I'm particularly interested in review of point (3) in what I've
written;
I feel
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
Thanks David!
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:32 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
I'm particularly interested in review of point (3) in what I've written;
I feel that the argument I've written so far is weak, I
This seems satisfactory to me.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:32 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
Here are the comments I have so far on this charter, based on the
thread. I'd note that this is a relatively large set of demands to make
in the charter review stage at the AC, especially
This seems good to me.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:20 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
Here's a revised set of comments, mainly changing:
- describes the objection to powerfulfeatures (part of objection (3))
more clearly, but also, I think, scopes the objection a bit more
Thanks. Hopefully all will be back to normal soon.
Best,
-Ekr
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Gregory Szorc g...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Eric Rescorla e...@rtfm.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Gregory Szorc g...@mozilla.com wrote:
The steps within
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:56 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
On Friday 2015-01-16 09:58 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:53 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org
wrote:
Please reply to this thread if you think there's something else we
should say,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Gregory Szorc g...@mozilla.com wrote:
The steps within my control to potentially fix this issue have been
postponed until at least tomorrow due to the Firefox Beta build today.
tl;dr is people don't want to take on additional risk changing
repositories.
I
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Martin Thomson m...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
* Permissions API this has been tried several times before. Given
that there's hardly any involvement from UX in standards, it's not
clear
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2014-12-22 6:52 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:35 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org
mailto:dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
On Monday 2014-12-22 18:21 -0500, Ehsan Akhgari wrote
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 8:48 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
On Tuesday 2014-12-23 08:36 -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote:
Why not pass the raw pointer to the function?
My general theory is that smart pointers, once boxed, should never be
unboxed.
The major arguments I see
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2014-12-23 11:36 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com
mailto:ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2014-12-23 10:38 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:14 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
On Tuesday 2014-12-23 09:59 -0800, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 9:55 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org
wrote:
But that's an implicit constructor that's causing extra refcount
traffic, which
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:51 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
On Tuesday 2014-12-23 13:14 -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote:
Just to be clear, is your problem the implicit conversion itself
or the reference count increment/decrement?
The latter -- the problem is that there's
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 2:07 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
On Tuesday 2014-12-23 14:03 -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote:
This may be a much longer argument, but I'm not convinced that
sacrificing what would otherwise be good programming practice
(never unboxing your pointers
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2014-12-22 4:10 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
We were talking about this problem and it was a bunch of work to figure
out the conclusion so I decided to write a summary:
Replacing already_AddRefed with nsRefPtr
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:35 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
On Monday 2014-12-22 18:21 -0500, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-12-22 6:07 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
On Monday 2014-12-22 17:54 -0500, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-12-22 4:56 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
I think
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Seth Fowler s...@mozilla.com wrote:
I’d like to change the coding style guide to let us make out-params more
obvious by using an ‘o’ prefix for their name instead of an ‘a’. For
example,
nsresult Modify(int aCount, size_t aSize, char* oResult);
This will
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Nicholas Nethercote n.netherc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Eric Rescorla e...@rtfm.com wrote:
I’d like to change the coding style guide to let us make out-params more
obvious by using an ‘o’ prefix for their name instead
Let me try to answer at a high level first. I use git for all of my
workflows and
when I collaborate with other people on my team, we use git and github.
See, for instance:
https://github.com/unicorn-wg/gecko-dev/tree/multistream_rebase
So, I primarily need to engage with hg for the following
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Eric Rescorla e...@rtfm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Eric Rescorla e...@rtfm.com wrote:
Unfortunately, for the reasons I mentioned in the post I linked to
above,
it's hard for the user to give informed consent here, as they don't
Here is my writeup of the security issues with this from a while ago:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2013Mar/0024.html
As MT says, we already are shipping screen sharing in FF 33. It's
currently whitelisted, but otherwise it's fairly complete.
-Ekr
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at
24, 2014, at 11:44 , Eric Rescorla e...@rtfm.com wrote:
Here is my writeup of the security issues with this from a while ago:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2013Mar/0024.html
As MT says, we already are shipping screen sharing in FF 33. It's
currently whitelisted
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can we keep track of where the stream comes from, and make sure to taint
the images that can come out of them similar to the way that
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ted Mielczarek t...@mielczarek.org wrote:
On 10/22/2014 9:29 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
Is there a mechanism for running single gtests that start XPCOM?
Not that I know of currently. The gtest runner explicitly starts XPCOM
before running tests[1].
With
Sadly, the WebRTC gtest-based ones (e.g., media/webrtc/signaling/test) do.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Benjamin Smedberg benja...@smedbergs.us
wrote:
On 10/3/2014 4:59 AM, Patrick Wang wrote:
Hi,
I am trying
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 06:34:19PM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-10-01, 6:26 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 11:00:28AM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-10-01, 9:01 AM, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
On
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:02:46PM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 06:34:19PM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-10-01, 6:26
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:42 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
On Wednesday 2014-10-01 16:24 -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
Obviously, if you have some argument that auto is bad programming
practice
or a hazard and should thus be forbidden, that's something you could make
and
see
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Dale Harvey d...@arandomurl.com wrote:
There's a host of problems when you're using file URLs.
pun intended? :)
Heh. (Note that file URLs apparently count as authenticated
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
Exposing geolocation on unauthenticated origins was a mistake. Copying
that for getUserMedia() is too. I suggest that to protect our users we
make some noise about deprecating this practice. And that in that
message
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Richard Barnes rbar...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On Sep 15, 2014, at 5:11 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi wrote:
I think the primary way for making the experience better for users
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Martin Thomson m...@mozilla.com wrote
An iframe embed is different, but in that context, the framed site
retains complete control over its content and is arguably competent to
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Eric Rescorla e...@rtfm.com wrote:
Sure, I think there are some reasonable cases. Say that a site asks to
take your picture for the purpose of displaying an avatar. So you give
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:34 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi
wrote:
Is current gUM restricted to authenticated origins? If it
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Daniel Veditz dved...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 8/24/2014 6:21 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
FWIW, to the best of my knowledge WebRTC calls do not require a click.
But you have to click on the door-hanger to share camera/mic (or be on a
site you have already trusted
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Gregory Szorc g...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 8/22/14 9:08 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Unfortunately I don't really understand the reasons behind this, but if
you
use this command, please know that it doesn't work properly any more, even
if it seems to work in some
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:24:53PM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Gregory Szorc g...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 8/22/14 9:08 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Unfortunately I don't really
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Jared Hirsch 6...@mozilla.com wrote:
FWIW, Safari on iOS doesn't allow autoplay or preload, and also only
initiates play/load on a user-triggered event (so, pages can't use JS to
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:22 AM, tzi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 14, 2014 2:00:47 PM UTC+3, Gervase Markham wrote:
On 13/07/14 18:35, Vasilis wrote:
Jonas, I would be really interested in your thoughts. Try as we might
(in the WebSerial API docs, at least), noone could
What are you assuming about access to actual USB devices?
-Ekr
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Andrew McCreight amccrei...@mozilla.com
wrote:
- Original Message -
Jonas, I would be really interested in your thoughts. Try as we might
(in the
WebSerial API docs, at least), noone
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:34 AM, J. Ryan Stinnett jry...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
It's also security boost for 64 bit users.
Could someone please explain why you and Google claim 64bit to be more
secure? This is a new argument
201 - 242 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
