Re: Intent to implement: Ability to surpress default contextmenu items

2014-07-10 Thread Ian Hickson
xt > overlays and hides the page provided one, making it inaccessible. Right, that's why contextmenu="" exists in the first place. All I'm saying is that we should strive for the ideal middle ground, where the page's context menu is given a strong presence, thus s

Re: Intent to implement and ship: Improved ruby parsing in HTML with new tag omission rules

2014-07-07 Thread ian . hickson
ongly requires this and a > Mozilla developer has already started working on it. Could you elaborate on why we are using the more complicated W3C rules here instead of the simpler WHATWG rules, given that the WHATWG rules also address the same use cases? See: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show

Re: Intent to implement: Ability to surpress default contextmenu items

2014-06-28 Thread Ian Hickson
d of letting the author prevent the user from getting to the user's browser's commands, the browser instead simply hide the browser commands behind a disclosure chevron, as in this example: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/interacti

Re: intent to ship: drawFocusIfNeeded

2014-05-06 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 6 May 2014, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > Just so we're clear, I really don't care what the name is, nor do I > > have any objection to people having private conversations or whatnot. > >

Re: intent to ship: drawFocusIfNeeded

2014-05-05 Thread Ian Hickson
what we have here is confusion resulting from the W3C having redundant venues, forked specs, and so on, and IMHO if we start cherry picking which specs we're following like this, we're setting a really bad precedent for future times when we have

Re: intent to ship: drawFocusIfNeeded

2014-05-05 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 6 May 2014, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > drawFocusIfNeeded() isn't a particularly good name either, since > > you're not drawing the focus, you're drawing the focus ring. > > In

Re: intent to ship: drawFocusIfNeeded

2014-05-05 Thread Ian Hickson
parties (in particular, authors) could have visibility into the discussion. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A/, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--

Re: intent to ship: drawFocusIfNeeded

2014-05-01 Thread Ian Hickson
uld be called if we followed the same naming scheme. The WHATWG spec is going to follow browsers, but that doesn't mean that the new name is necessarily better. If it was, I would have updated the spec already instead of waiting for multiple UAs to do some

Re: AppCache usage on Alexa top ~50,000 sites

2013-07-11 Thread Ian Hickson
but is used on intranets and behind paywalls and authentication walls). -- Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A/, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.

Re: Cycle collection for workers

2013-02-07 Thread Ian Hickson
e > frame rate. > > If it turns out that violates the spec (I haven't looked), then we'll > lobby for spec change :-). Pretty sure the spec allows that. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A

Re: Cycle collection for workers

2013-02-07 Thread Ian Hickson
s modelled in such a way that really that's equivalent to grabbing the bitmap and shipping that over using postMessage() and having the main thread post it to the GPU. (Doesn't have to be implemented that way, but it's not supposed to be distinguishable from t