Hi Everyone,
Taking in all of the feedback received, Byron came up with updated proposal in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=851818#c3 that I think will
address the needs of the feedback provided here. If you have any additional
comments, feedback, etc, please feel free to provide
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:52:23 +0100, Anthony Ricaud wrote:
On 18/03/13 17:39, L. David Baron wrote:
On Monday 2013-03-18 09:27 -0700, Jason Smith wrote:
I'd actually like to see Core higher on the list for the
no-canconfirm case. I think it's common for reasonably
well-informed Web developers
I disagree on Calendar being on that list. Doing some Bugzilla diving shows
that the number of bugs filed in Calendar over the past month was around ~30 or
so bugs. That's less than the Gaia Calendar app itself (which is a Bugzilla
component) and is on the low end in comparison to other
jsmith.mozi...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree on Calendar being on that list. Doing some Bugzilla diving shows
that the number of bugs filed in Calendar over the past month was around ~30 or
so bugs. That's less than the Gaia Calendar app itself (which is a Bugzilla
component)
Are these bugs
Seems like a good proposal, but dev-platform doesn't really feel like the
best place to get feedback from the people affected. Not sure what would
be, though.
(on Labs: There's a bunch of smaller projects there, but I don't mind if
they're slightly harder to find)
--da
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at
On Monday 2013-03-18 09:27 -0700, Jason Smith wrote:
*existing canconfirm access* *enter bug entry page list*
- Core
- Firefox
- Thunderbird
- Calendar
- Camino
- SeaMonkey
- Firefox for Android
- Mozilla Localizations
- Mozilla Labs
- Mozilla Services
- Other Products
*existing
On 18/03/2013 16:27, Jason Smith wrote:
- BootToGecko - Big focus at Mozilla with a lot of people working on
this project, so I think this could benefit greatly from being on the
front page.
This should be Firefox OS as that's what the users will know it as.
*Rationale for Removals*
-
I have a concern that removing active community projects would increase the
community/MOCO divide.
Kevin
On Mar 18, 2013 10:35 AM, Mark Banner mban...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 18/03/2013 16:27, Jason Smith wrote:
- BootToGecko - Big focus at Mozilla with a lot of people working on
this project,
On 2013-03-18 12:39 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
I'd actually like to see Core higher on the list for the
no-canconfirm case. I think it's common for reasonably
well-informed Web developers (who would have been able to choose a
reasonably correct component within Core, given the list) to file
Jason Smith schrieb:
*Ideas for what products we should remove*
And how the XXX should users of those products file new bugs then?
Robert Kaiser
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Sounds good to me.
Also to add in a piece of private feedback I received - SeaMonkey wants
to remain on the front page as there's a strong community behind it that
still works on that project.
Sincerely,
Jason Smith
Desktop QA Engineer
Mozilla Corporation
https://quality.mozilla.com
On
On 3/18/13 10:14 PM, Jason Smith wrote:
Sounds good to me.
Also to add in a piece of private feedback I received - SeaMonkey wants
to remain on the front page as there's a strong community behind it that
still works on that project.
For similar reasons I would like Calendar to stay on the
(2013/03/19 2:31), Mark Banner wrote:
On 18/03/2013 16:27, Jason Smith wrote:
- BootToGecko - Big focus at Mozilla with a lot of people working on
this project, so I think this could benefit greatly from being on the
front page.
This should be Firefox OS as that's what the users will know it
Robert Kaiser wrote:
*Ideas for what products we should remove*
And how the XXX should users of those products file new bugs then?
we're talking about removing products from the list of products
initially shown to users, not about removing the products from bmo
completely.
the complete list
14 matches
Mail list logo
