On 06/15/2014 05:04 AM, Botond Ballo wrote:
I would love to get more people at Mozilla involved in C++
standardization / get more organized about it.
I also have a standing offer to assist anyone at Mozilla who would
like to write a standards proposal do so, and present the proposal
at a
Very cool.
One quick question - is this covered in the proposal?
class Base {
virtual int f( int ba, char bb );
};
class Derived {
virtual int f( int da, char db ); // is this allowed and does it count like
a base class function override?
};
Derived d;
Base* b = d;
// What is the
One quick question - is this covered in the proposal?
class Base {
virtual int f( int ba, char bb );
};
class Derived {
virtual int f( int da, char db ); // is this allowed and does it count
like a base class function override?
};
Derived d;
Base* b = d;
// What is the
On 2014-06-18, 2:30 PM, Milan Sreckovic wrote:
Works for me.
For the function override in the first place though, the names of the
parameters are ignored, right?
Yes. Basically, I think we should not make the names of the arguments
part of the function's type, which would imply that the
On 2014-06-14, 10:58 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
Looks good.
A classic problem we have had is with boolean parameters, which are hard
to read at call sites. We currently solve that by turning them into enum
or flag parameters, but named parameters would be a lighter-weight
alternative.
A bit off-topic, but do we at Mozilla have any kind of a (semi-)
organized group of folks involved with C++ standardization? I follow
along fairly closely (especially in SG7 - Reflection) and have a couple
of proposals I'm thinking about, but that's strictly in my spare time.
It'd be nice to
Hello everyone,
Ehsan and I would like to propose named arguments as a new feature for C++.
We have a draft proposal paper here:
http://ehsan.github.io/namedargs/namedargs.html
Any feedback on it would be greatly appreciated!
(I will not be formally presenting this proposal at the upcoming
Looks good.
A classic problem we have had is with boolean parameters, which are hard to
read at call sites. We currently solve that by turning them into enum or
flag parameters, but named parameters would be a lighter-weight
alternative. However, it would be great to be able to ensure at the
On 06/14/2014 01:07 PM, Botond Ballo wrote:
Ehsan and I would like to propose named arguments as a new feature for C++.
A bit off-topic, but do we at Mozilla have any kind of a (semi-)
organized group of folks involved with C++ standardization? I follow
along fairly closely (especially in SG7 -
9 matches
Mail list logo
