Hi,
On behalf of the Mozilla IoT team I'd like to recommend that Mozilla
support this Interest Group charter.
There are a few topic areas I think are probably unnecessary (e.g. Thing
Templates and Scripting API), but these are all "explorations" and
non-normative deliverables. Overall the
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> We should just let them do their thing and do our thing elsewhere.
This seems like a reasonable plan. Unless and until someone thinks
that a course correction is feasible, or decides that it's worth
trying.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Benjamin Francis wrote:
> Can we make suggestions about how to improve the charter rather than just
> oppose it? I don't necessarily agree with the technical approach the group
> is currently taking, but I do agree that the Web of Things
On 22 June 2016 at 17:18, L. David Baron wrote:
> So opposing it takes both a good bit of energy and a potentially a
> good bit of political capital (in that it might reduce the
> seriousness with which people take future objections that we make).
> Do you think it's actually
On Monday 2016-06-20 01:38 -0700, mar...@marcosc.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 7:06:39 PM UTC+10, David Baron wrote:
>
> > Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should
> > say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should
> > support or oppose it.
>
5 matches
Mail list logo