Re: Intent to ship: RC4 disabled by default in Firefox 44

And from Microsoft: http://blogs.windows.com/msedgedev/2015/09/01/ending-support-for-the-rc4-cipher-in-microsoft-edge-and-internet-explorer-11/ On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: > Speaking of other browsers, the corresponding Chromium thread is here: >

Re: How would you like to spell check this?

On 1/09/2015 16:01, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: I suppose you can find them on #fx-team. Just for the record from IRC: jorgk: Hi, #fx-team. I had this discussion with Ehsan https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.platform/Et02D8Mk2d0 on improving the spell checking in Firefox.

Re: Intent to ship: RC4 disabled by default in Firefox 44

Speaking of other browsers, the corresponding Chromium thread is here: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/security-dev/kVfCywocUO8/vgi_rQuhKgAJ On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: > For a while now, we have been progressively disabling

Re: On the future of and application/x-x509-*-cert MIME handling

On Thursday, 30 July 2015 12:34:30 UTC+2, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Teoli > wrote: > > Do you think it is already worth to flag it as deprecated in the MDN > > documentation as Google plans to remove it too? > > Yeah, seems

Re: On the future of and application/x-x509-*-cert MIME handling

On Thursday, 30 July 2015 20:32:07 UTC+2, Richard Barnes wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Hubert Kario wrote: > > > On Wednesday 29 July 2015 16:35:41 David Keeler wrote: > > > [cc'd to dev-security for visibility. This discussion is intended to > > > happen on

Re: Intent to Implement and Ship: Permissions API

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Birunthan Mohanathas > wrote: >> Summary: The Permissions API allows a web application to be aware of >> the status of a given permission, to know whether it

Re: Intent to Implement and Ship: Permissions API

On 2015-09-01 9:57 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: But I agree that we should make it clear that we do not intend to implement a request API. There is actually a valid use case for a request API. It has become clear that we need to expose pasting functionality to the Web, and the most natural way

Web APIs documentation/engagement/dev team meeting Thursday at 8 AM PDT

The Web API documentation community meeting, with representatives from the technical evangelism and the API development teams, will take place on Thursday at 8 AM Pacific Time (see http://bit.ly/1GghwBR for your time zone). Typical meetings include news about recent API development progress and

Re: How would you like to spell check this?

Hi all, I hope we can at least agree on fixing the problems with the current behaviour. I raised bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1200533 for that. The clear order of priorities that will be established will be: 1) content preference, not ignoring an "en-GB" setting on a plain

Sheriffing Newsletter September!

Hi, to give a little insight into our work and make our work more visible for our Community we decided to create a new monthly report from whats going on in the Sheriffs Team and our work. If you have questions or feedback just let us know! This is the first edition of this newsletter so let

Re: How would you like to spell check this?

Oh come on, this is getting ridiculous. THIS IS A BUG, no matter how much some contributors want to pretend it isn't. It's a conceptually simple bug that's been sitting around for at least 3.5 years (since reported). To put it simply, if I select a language via the context menu, it should

Re: How would you like to spell check this?

On 1/09/2015 16:01, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: The fundamental issue is that different people have different needs, and there is also the information that the website gives us which we need to take into account somehow. You are describing what _you_ would like to see. Actually: No. I was

Re: How would you like to spell check this?

On 2015-08-31 5:57 PM, Jörg Knobloch wrote: On 31/08/2015 17:18, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: Just wanting to reiterate that the problem is not as big as you claim it is. We did not break Firefox for "single language users". If you take a good look at the fallback processing in

Re: Smart Card and WebCrypto (Re: On the future of and application/x-x509-*-cert MIME handling)

On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Tim Guan-tin Chien > wrote: >> It's also worthy to point out many nation-state deploys Smart Card >> identifications (despite the privacy concern), allow it's