Another rather nice purpose for the s-r flag, in my experience, is exposed
during onboarding of fresh, remote, engineers (like I was ~1 year ago): it
allowed me to get acquainted with the review cycle while working on Good Next
Bugs(tm) that touched intricate parts of the codebase, like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/26/2014 09:03 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 4/26/14, 11:32 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
it might be better to just create files in the ultimate target
directory if we aren't already.
We create the file before the user has picked the ultimate
On 4/27/14, 10:06 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
maybe we should stop doing that?
The issue is deciding where to put the incoming data. We can't just
buffer it in RAM while the download is proceeding and the user has gone
to lunch without selecting a download location, because in many cases
Hi Zack,
- Original Message -
From: Zack Weinberg za...@panix.com
To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 12:11:23 PM
Subject: Re: OS.File design issue from bug 961080 (making downloads respect
umask)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On
- Original Message -
From: Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu
To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 6:03:42 PM
Subject: Re: OS.File design issue from bug 961080 (making downloads respect
umask)
On 4/26/14, 11:32 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
it might be better
Every time I send an email to dev-platform, I get the following email as a
reply.
Can we get supp...@lativio.com removed from the mailing list?
Dave Hylands
- Original Message -
From: supp...@lativio.com
To: dhyla...@mozilla.com
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 9:15:14 AM
Subject:
On Sunday 2014-04-27 09:29 -0700, Dave Hylands wrote:
Every time I send an email to dev-platform, I get the following email as a
reply.
Can we get supp...@lativio.com removed from the mailing list?
To answer your question in the subject, the moderator of the
(mailman side of) this group
Note that I filed 1002263 for this.
On 2014-04-27, 7:58 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
On Sunday 2014-04-27 09:29 -0700, Dave Hylands wrote:
Every time I send an email to dev-platform, I get the following email as a
reply.
Can we get supp...@lativio.com removed from the mailing list?
To answer
Bugs 900903 and 900908 introduced variadic variants of
NS_IMPL_ISUPPORTS, NS_IMPL_QUERY_INTERFACE, NS_IMPL_CYCLE_COLLECTION,
etc. and removed the old numbered macros. So, instead of e.g.
NS_IMPL_ISUPPORTS2(nsFoo, nsIBar, nsIBaz), simply use
NS_IMPL_ISUPPORTS(nsFoo, nsIBar, nsIBaz) instead. Right
On 4/28/14, 12:18 AM, Birunthan Mohanathas wrote:
Right now, the new macros support up to 50 variadic arguments.
If someone uses more than that, will that fail to compile or silently
ignore the extra args?
-Boris
P.S. I know, the right answer is they need fewer interfaces... ;)
On 28 April 2014 07:29, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 4/28/14, 12:18 AM, Birunthan Mohanathas wrote:
Right now, the new macros support up to 50 variadic arguments.
If someone uses more than that, will that fail to compile or silently ignore
the extra args?
It will fail to
On 4/28/14, 12:38 AM, Birunthan Mohanathas wrote:
It will fail to compile.
Excellent!
-Boris
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
12 matches
Mail list logo
