Re: Intent to Ship: Fetch API

2015-02-19 Thread Benjamin Kelly
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote: On 2/18/15 12:06 PM, nsm.nik...@gmail.com wrote: 1) ESR - FF 38 is an ESR release and shipping a new API with some parts not yet supported may not be the best thing to do. What is the usual policy in such a situation?

Re: Intent to Ship: Fetch API

2015-02-19 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 2/19/15 2:26 PM, Benjamin Kelly wrote: It seems to me that backporting to dom/fetch should be relatively straightforward. Its pretty isolated code. The real question there is how much churn you expect in that code over the next year as the pieces that aren't one yet end up happening.

Re: Testing for expected crashes in both C++ and js, for printf checking

2015-02-19 Thread axel
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 6:33:42 PM UTC+1, Ted Mielczarek wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015, at 10:27 AM, Axel Hecht wrote: Hi, I'd like to write tests to validate my assumptions around what's an error and what's a warning for localized values going into nsTextFormatter::smprintf.

Re: Talos on e10s is broken. Do we care?

2015-02-19 Thread jmathies
Do we realistically care about keeping this working? With perfherder graphs, we now have a way of visualizing/tracking relative performance (http://wrla.ch/blog/2015/02/measuring-e10s-vs-non-e10s-performance-with-perfherder/), though I'm not sure if that's really telling us anything we don't

Re: Talos on e10s is broken. Do we care?

2015-02-19 Thread jmaher
Right now we are running jobs on linux/windows/osx and they are all timing out. That means we are eating up machine time for roughly an hour a job when most jobs take 20 minutes. By the end of the month we should either take a larger hit on our infrastructure and get these running on

Re: Intent to Ship: Fetch API

2015-02-19 Thread Brian Smith
nsm.nik...@gmail.com wrote: Target release: FF 38 or 39 (feedback requested) Currently hidden behind: dom.fetch.enabled. Bug to enable by default: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1133861 Great work! Is there a test that verifies that fetch is correctly handled by nsIContentPolicy

Fwd: [dev-servo] CSS Houdini meeting report

2015-02-19 Thread Jet Villegas
Cross-posting to dev-platform. Much of Simon's summary below applies to Gecko. --Jet -- Forwarded message -- From: Simon Sapin simon.sa...@exyr.org Date: Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:28 AM Subject: [dev-servo] CSS Houdini meeting report To: dev-se...@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Testing for expected crashes in both C++ and js, for printf checking

2015-02-19 Thread Tom Tromey
Axel == axel-4eJtQOnFJqFBDgjK7y7TUQ axel-4ejtqonfjqfbdgjk7y7...@public.gmane.org writes: Axel I'm talking actual crashes, and I don't know how we would fix the Axel text formatter. I'm glancing at Axel http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/glue/nsTextFormatter.cpp#778, Axel

Re: Intent to Ship: Fetch API

2015-02-19 Thread James Graham
On 18/02/15 17:31, nsm.nik...@gmail.com wrote: We have fairly comprehensive mochitests in dom/workers/tests/fetch and dom/tests/mochitests/fetch. The blink intent to ship email, at the bottom, has a section which documents Canary performing well on our tests. In addition, we pass (except

Re: [dev-servo] UI Workers

2015-02-19 Thread James Long
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote: On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, James Long longs...@gmail.com wrote: Personally I think what we *really* need to be working on is making all of the DOM APIs asynchronous. That's what Servo needs anyway.

Re: Testing for expected crashes in both C++ and js, for printf checking

2015-02-19 Thread axel
On Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 11:27:11 PM UTC+1, Tom Tromey wrote: Axel writes: Axel I'm talking actual crashes, and I don't know how we would fix the Axel text formatter. I'm glancing at Axel http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/glue/nsTextFormatter.cpp#778, Axel and

Re: [dev-servo] UI Workers

2015-02-19 Thread James Long
I'm not heavily involved in platform work, so take my input as a somewhat naïve outsider. I've been tracking this kind of stuff very closely, especially after I got to play with react native. The place where this is most important is mobile, and I don't think #2 is going to cut it. It's not just

UI Workers

2015-02-19 Thread Robert O'Callahan
Last week in Sydney I spent a lot of time talking to Chrome devs about different approaches for 60fps effects in Web pages. There are three different kinds of approaches being discussed (so far): 1) Apple's animation-timeline proposal, which lets CSS animations use scroll position as an input

Re: [dev-servo] UI Workers

2015-02-19 Thread James Long
Sorry, I may have missed the last part of your email where you say that you could provide touch positions as input too. This would be neat research and I'd like to see more details. Note however that people in the native app world believe that it's very important that whatever applies the

Re: [dev-servo] UI Workers

2015-02-19 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, James Long longs...@gmail.com wrote: Personally I think what we *really* need to be working on is making all of the DOM APIs asynchronous. That's what Servo needs anyway. That's a step in the right direction for #3, and we can see much more we can