On 2015/04/28 10:43, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Please make sure to do a security review so that this doesn't expose
any sensitive information accidentally. In particular, is there any
way to use this API to use :visited hacks along with timing
information to see if a user has visited a particular URL?
This is awesome!! I completely agree that the Google proposal is much
too complicated for an initial take on solving transitions.
I agree with Anne that this should be doable by adding CSS rules to a
normal stylesheet rather than using a special linking mechanism. If
that sounds good to you, then
How is this related to PROFILER_LABELs, docshell ProfileTimelineMarkers,
and VisualEventTracer?
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:07:51PM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Trevor Saunders
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 03:48:48PM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> > > Right now, our coding style requires that both the virtual and override
> > > keywords to be specif
Please make sure to do a security review so that this doesn't expose
any sensitive information accidentally. In particular, is there any
way to use this API to use :visited hacks along with timing
information to see if a user has visited a particular URL?
/ Jonas
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:27 AM,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Trevor Saunders
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 03:48:48PM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> > Right now, our coding style requires that both the virtual and override
> > keywords to be specified for overridden virtual functions. A few things
> > have changed since
That's correct. Using override and final on a non-virtual function is a
compile time error.
On Apr 27, 2015 5:34 PM, "L. David Baron" wrote:
> On Monday 2015-04-27 15:48 -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> > Right now, our coding style requires that both the virtual and override
> > keywords to be spec
Wow. Email formatting fail. Hopefully this turns out a little better:
"""
Hello platform hackers!
[Operation Instrument](https://wiki.mozilla.org/DevTools/OperationInstrument)
is a project that aims to add tracing instrumentation to Gecko and provide
a holistic view of where time is being spent a
Hello platform hackers!
[
Operation Instrument
]
(htt
ps://wiki.mozilla.org/DevTools/OperationInstrument)
is a project that aims to add tracing instrumentation to Gecko and provide
a holistic view of where time is being spent and why.
Examples of traced operations include:
*
Style
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 03:48:48PM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> Right now, our coding style requires that both the virtual and override
> keywords to be specified for overridden virtual functions. A few things
> have changed since we decided that a number of years ago:
>
> 1. The override and fi
On 04/27/2015 01:47 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> BUT, if we add back the "virtual" keyword, we *lose some strictness*. In
> other words, this is *not* equivalent to the versions above:
> "virtual void foo() final"
> Unless the formulations above, this version isn't guaranteed to override.
(er s/U
On 04/27/2015 12:48 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> I think we should
> change it to require the usage of exactly one of these keywords per
> *overridden* function: virtual, override, and final.
Let me attempt to clarify why the "exactly one" requirement here is
important. (It's non-obvious.)
This ver
I completely support this. Let the needless verbosity end!
- Seth
> On Apr 27, 2015, at 12:48 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
>
> Right now, our coding style requires that both the virtual and override
> keywords to be specified for overridden virtual functions. A few things
> have changed since we d
Right now, our coding style requires that both the virtual and override
keywords to be specified for overridden virtual functions. A few things
have changed since we decided that a number of years ago:
1. The override and final keywords are now available on all of the
compilers that we build with
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Mark Côté wrote:
> This morning we enabled a feature on bugzilla.mozilla.org that allows
> users to log in with their GitHub credentials, similar to our existing
> Persona support. If you have several email addresses associated with
> your GitHub account, you wil
Thank you all for reading through the post and the feedback.
It seems that there is interest for this.
On 15-04-24 06:06 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:26:58PM +0100, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
Are you going to build a web UI for this so I don't need to check out a repo
and run a
On 2015-04-27 10:54 AM, Mark Côté wrote:
On 2015-04-27 10:41 AM, Mike Hoye wrote:
What does "special administrative or security permissions" mean? Can a
user logged in via GitHub have editbugs or canconfirm?
editbugs and canconfirm on their own are fine. The vast majority of
users will be able
On 2015-04-27 10:41 AM, Mike Hoye wrote:
> On 2015-04-27 10:15 AM, Mark Côté wrote:
>> This morning we enabled a feature on bugzilla.mozilla.org that allows
>> users to log in with their GitHub credentials, similar to our existing
>> Persona support. If you have several email addresses associated
On 2015-04-27 10:41 AM, Mike Hoye wrote:
On 2015-04-27 10:15 AM, Mark Côté wrote:
This morning we enabled a feature on bugzilla.mozilla.org that allows
users to log in with their GitHub credentials, similar to our existing
Persona support. If you have several email addresses associated with
you
On 2015-04-27 10:15 AM, Mark Côté wrote:
This morning we enabled a feature on bugzilla.mozilla.org that allows
users to log in with their GitHub credentials, similar to our existing
Persona support. If you have several email addresses associated with
your GitHub account, you will be prompted to
This morning we enabled a feature on bugzilla.mozilla.org that allows
users to log in with their GitHub credentials, similar to our existing
Persona support. If you have several email addresses associated with
your GitHub account, you will be prompted to choose one. In either
case, if your chosen
On 2015-04-27 6:29 AM, Neil wrote:
NS_LITERAL_STRING, as its name suggests, only ever gets used on string
literals, or macros that expand to string literals.
NS_LITERAL_CSTRING gets (ab?)used in all sorts of ways. Should we be
consistent and require NS_LITERAL_CSTRING to be used on string litera
NS_LITERAL_STRING, as its name suggests, only ever gets used on string
literals, or macros that expand to string literals.
NS_LITERAL_CSTRING gets (ab?)used in all sorts of ways. Should we be
consistent and require NS_LITERAL_CSTRING to be used on string literals?
I found the following in-tree
Hi all
I want to develop an multiplatform application for Windows and Android with web
browse capabilties. The application will be written using C++. Under Windows no
problem but looking into xulrunner version for android I don't find the library
"libxpcom.so" to use for run xul gecko engine. T
Summary: Provides an interface for receiving frame performance timing
including composites happening on a separate thread/process. This can
be used to calculate measures of smoothness that incorporate the
effect of async pan and zoom and off-main thread animation.
Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org
25 matches
Mail list logo
