Re: Intent to enable e10s by default when running tests locally

2016-04-02 Thread L. David Baron
On Thursday 2016-03-24 12:51 -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 3/24/16 12:43 PM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote: > >I'm not aware of work around this. If --debugger is completely busted > >with e10s, I could potentially make --debugger imply --disable-e10s > >until it gets fixed. Is there a bug on file?

Re: Why is Mozreview hassling me about squashed commits?

2016-04-02 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: > When you say "I almost never want to review individual commits and instead > want to review the changeset as a single diff," I'm confused because a > commit is a changeset (in Mercurial terms at least) and this statement is

Re: Why is Mozreview hassling me about squashed commits?

2016-04-02 Thread James Graham
On 02/04/16 21:59, Gregory Szorc wrote: When you say "I almost never want to review individual commits and instead want to review the changeset as a single diff," I'm confused because a commit is a changeset (in Mercurial terms at least) and this statement is contradictory. You seem to be saying

Re: Why is Mozreview hassling me about squashed commits?

2016-04-02 Thread Gregory Szorc
When you say "I almost never want to review individual commits and instead want to review the changeset as a single diff," I'm confused because a commit is a changeset (in Mercurial terms at least) and this statement is contradictory. You seem to be saying that you want to look at a series of

Why is Mozreview hassling me about squashed commits?

2016-04-02 Thread Eric Rescorla
"This is a squashed review request, containing the sum of all commits in the series. It is intended only to provide an overview of a series of commits. At the moment, you *can*leave review comments here, which will be mirrored to Bugzilla, but they will not affect the review status of individual