On Thursday 2016-03-24 12:51 -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 3/24/16 12:43 PM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> >I'm not aware of work around this. If --debugger is completely busted
> >with e10s, I could potentially make --debugger imply --disable-e10s
> >until it gets fixed. Is there a bug on file?
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> When you say "I almost never want to review individual commits and instead
> want to review the changeset as a single diff," I'm confused because a
> commit is a changeset (in Mercurial terms at least) and this statement is
On 02/04/16 21:59, Gregory Szorc wrote:
When you say "I almost never want to review individual commits and instead
want to review the changeset as a single diff," I'm confused because a
commit is a changeset (in Mercurial terms at least) and this statement is
contradictory. You seem to be saying
When you say "I almost never want to review individual commits and instead
want to review the changeset as a single diff," I'm confused because a
commit is a changeset (in Mercurial terms at least) and this statement is
contradictory. You seem to be saying that you want to look at a series of
"This is a squashed review request, containing the sum of all commits in
the series. It is intended only to provide an overview of a series of
commits. At the moment, you *can*leave review comments here, which will be
mirrored to Bugzilla, but they will not affect the review status of
individual
5 matches
Mail list logo