Re: PSA: some setTimeout()/setInterval() changes

On 10/27/16 12:48 PM, Ben Kelly wrote: On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Mike Taylor > wrote: On 10/27/16 10:08 AM, Ben Kelly wrote: The short story is that there should be very minimal observable difference. How do these

Re: PSA: some setTimeout()/setInterval() changes

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: > On 10/27/16 10:08 AM, Ben Kelly wrote: > >> The short story is that there should be very minimal observable >> difference. >> > > How do these changes compare with other browsers behavior (for the > web-observable effects)?

Re: PSA: some setTimeout()/setInterval() changes

Hey Ben, On 10/27/16 10:08 AM, Ben Kelly wrote: The short story is that there should be very minimal observable difference. How do these changes compare with other browsers behavior (for the web-observable effects)? Do you have any idea? -- Mike Taylor Web Compat, Mozilla

PSA: some setTimeout()/setInterval() changes

Hey all, Just FYI, I've landed a refactoring of how we suspend our timers in: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1303167 The short story is that there should be very minimal observable difference. The main changes you might see are: 1) Previously we shifted timers during things

Re: do_GetService("@mozilla.org/embedcomp/prompt-service; 1") doesn`t work any longer in FW v

On 10/27/16 10:57 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: And also it's very unlikely that a modal prompt is a good UI solution from within the network stack. Oh, that's a good point. NSS code has a tendency to run on random threads from the socket threadpool, and the

Re: do_GetService("@mozilla.org/embedcomp/prompt-service; 1") doesn`t work any longer in FW v

Please don't use binary XPCOM. Support for binary XPCOM is being removed. And also it's very unlikely that a modal prompt is a good UI solution from within the network stack. --BDS On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Tobias Wolf wrote: > Hi folks, > > I`ve developed a nss

Re: do_GetService("@mozilla.org/embedcomp/prompt-service; 1") doesn`t work any longer in FW v

On 10/27/16 4:19 AM, Tobias Wolf wrote: No I found out that the dialog wasn`t working in latest firefox 46.0.2 version. The call to ```do_GetService("@mozilla.org/embedcomp/prompt-service;1")``` returns NULL. Is this with e10s enabled? If so, is the code running in the content process or

Re: Windows XP and Vista Long Term Support Plan

> > What I think would be helpful if Mozilla does go with this plan, is that, > first, Mozilla sets a definite end date up front for ESR 52 and, second, > that Mozilla has puts out the message as to what and why this is happening. > Setting an end date for support will give everyone a timeline to

Re: Removal of B2G from mozilla-central

Replying to myself since nobody thought it worthwhile to reply and have an open, honest discussion on this ML about this. Parts of the gonk widget have already been removed; so the decision to do it was taken was not communicated publicly. Or maybe it was never up for discussion. I don't know

Re: do_GetService("@mozilla.org/embedcomp/prompt-service; 1") doesn`t work any longer in FW v

Am Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2016 10:19:44 UTC+2 schrieb Tobias Wolf: > Hi folks, > > I`ve developed a nss module for firefox in c/c++. In case of an error in my > module I want to show a simple error dialog. > > This is want I do, the code was tested and working: > > ``` > void

do_GetService("@mozilla.org/embedcomp/prompt-service; 1") doesn`t work any longer in FW v

Hi folks, I`ve developed a nss module for firefox in c/c++. In case of an error in my module I want to show a simple error dialog. This is want I do, the code was tested and working: ``` void ac_firefox_show_alert_dlg(const char* title, const char* text) { const NS_ConvertASCIItoUTF16