TL;DR this will change crash signatures and possibly other tool output;
talk to me if this adversely affects you.
Now that bug 1332639 has removed the external string API, we no longer need
to differentiate between internal and external strings.
Currently we #define nsAString to
(Cross-posted to dev-platform and dev-tech-gfx, please reply to dev-platform)
In the near future I'm planning to make a change so that WebRender
will be built (but not enabled) by default in most Nightly/local
builds [1]. This will allow anybody running a stock nightly to turn on
The
On 03/10/2017 12:43 AM, Ben Kelly wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 02:46:53PM -0500, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
I review a large number of patches on a typical day, and usually I have
to
spend a fair amount of time to just
On Monday, March 13, 2017 at 7:45:44 AM UTC-7, Byron Jones wrote:
> David Burns wrote:
> > We should try mitigate the security problem and fix our nit problem
> > instead of bashing that we can't handle re-reviews because of nits.
> one way tooling could help here is to allow the reviewer to make
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Jared Wein wrote:
> Yes, we support watches in the new debugger UI now. The new debugger UI is
> used by default in the Browser Content Toolbox, and it is pretty nice and
> shiny.
New debugger UI is on for Browser Content Toolbox, but at the
Yes, we support watches in the new debugger UI now. The new debugger UI is
used by default in the Browser Content Toolbox, and it is pretty nice and
shiny.
Cheers,
Jared
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch
wrote:
> On 13/03/2017 16:48, J. Ryan Stinnett
On 2017-03-12 4:53 PM, smaug wrote:
> On 03/12/2017 10:40 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
>> On 2017-03-11 9:23 AM, smaug via governance wrote:
>>> On 03/11/2017 08:23 AM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 2:23 PM, smaug via governance <
governa...@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
On 13/03/2017 16:48, J. Ryan Stinnett wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Panos Astithas > wrote:
You almost completely resolved the 4-year-old bug 814298, yay! I
now wonder if this makes it easier to improve mochitest debugging
per
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Panos Astithas wrote:
> You almost completely resolved the 4-year-old bug 814298, yay! I now
> wonder if this makes it easier to improve mochitest debugging per bug
> 929535.
Thanks for the pointers to these bugs.
Bug 814298 stills needs
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 08:36:05AM -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
For the record, there's some nonobvious stuff I can remove from the
rooting hazard analysis due to this -- currently, it conservatively
assumes that just about any nsISupports subclass's method could be
implemented in a binary
On 03/13/2017 06:17 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
We do not. Bug 1299187 is related to such work, but that bug only
covers unexporting symbols that 3rd party software would access. bz
has filed a few bugs for removing nsIDOM* methods that only existed
due to 3rd party compat concerns, but I don't
On 13/03/17 14:45, Byron Jones wrote:
David Burns wrote:
We should try mitigate the security problem and fix our nit problem
instead of bashing that we can't handle re-reviews because of nits.
one way tooling could help here is to allow the reviewer to make minor
changes to the patch before it
David Burns wrote:
We should try mitigate the security problem and fix our nit problem
instead of bashing that we can't handle re-reviews because of nits.
one way tooling could help here is to allow the reviewer to make minor
changes to the patch before it lands.
ie. "r+, fix typo in comment
As the manager of the sheriffs, I am in favour of this proposal.
The reasons why are as follow (and to note there are only 3 paid sheriffs
to try cover the world):
* A number of r+ with nits land up in the sheriffs queue for
checkin-needed. This then puts the onus on the sheriffs, not the
Hi everyone,
Here's the list of new issues found and filed by the Desktop Release QA
Team last week, *March 6 - March 10* (week 10).
Additional details on the team's priorities last week, as well as the
plans for the current week are available at:
On 03/10/2017 12:59 AM, Bobby Holley wrote:
At a high level, I think the goals here are good.
However, the tooling here needs to be top-notch for this to work, and the
standard approach of flipping on an MVP and dealing with the rest in
followup bugs isn't going to be acceptable for something
We do not. Bug 1299187 is related to such work, but that bug only
covers unexporting symbols that 3rd party software would access. bz
has filed a few bugs for removing nsIDOM* methods that only existed
due to 3rd party compat concerns, but I don't think there's been
systematic evaluation of
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Frederik Braun wrote:
> On 12.03.2017 04:08, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> > On 3/10/17 4:38 AM, Masatoshi Kimura wrote:
> >> On 2017/03/10 6:53, Mike Connor wrote:
> >>> - Two-factor auth must be a requirement for all users approving or
> >>>
We will be running a migration on the Treeherder database which will
require pausing job ingestion at 08:30 UTC tomorrow (Tuesday). This is
expected to take around 90 minutes, and trees will be closed for the
duration.
Thank you for your patience.
On 12.03.2017 04:08, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> On 3/10/17 4:38 AM, Masatoshi Kimura wrote:
>> On 2017/03/10 6:53, Mike Connor wrote:
>>> - Two-factor auth must be a requirement for all users approving or
>>> pushing a change.
>>
>> I have no mobile devices. How can I use 2FA?
>>
>>
20 matches
Mail list logo