On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Jan Beich wrote:
> Botond Ballo writes:
>
>> Anyways, there is no conflict between supporting ALSA and supporting
>> 5.1 sound. As has been mentioned earlier in the thread, ALSA has since
>> added support for 5.1, and so IIUC it's just our wrapper library
>> (lib
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 6:49 PM, wrote:
> Why does a BROWSER need 5.1 or x.y sound???
The web platform is intended to be a competitive alternative to native
platforms. That means that whatever native applications can do, we'd
like web applications to be able to do as well, and that includes
pla
On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 at 10:31:50 PM UTC-4, ajo...@mozilla.com wrote:
> Supporting two separate audio backends in Linux is duplicated effort.
Then support, ONE.. ALSA.
> The most problematic backend across all platforms is ALSA. It is also missing
> full duplex support.
Don't disagree...
It seems that generally, we don't need a clobber when adding new IDL
files -- but this was a special case where we do (and I've just pushed a
CLOBBER-tweak followup to inbound).
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1351461#c4 for a theory
about why.
~Daniel
On 3/28/17 1:43 PM, Andre
I updated my tree this morning and did a build, and I ended up with a new
untracked
nsILayoutHistoryState.h file. Be sure to not accidentally commit it.
I deleted the file, and then had to do a clobber build to fix everything.
I filed bug 1351461 for the clobber issue or whatever it is.
_
On 28/03/2017 17:58, Zbigniew Braniecki (Gandalf) wrote:
We just landed the final change that culminates the 3 month long major
refactor of how Gecko handles language selection [0] (pending
autoland->central).
Nice job!
On top of that, we gained an additional helper API for retrieving
Interna
Just a heads-up that the git mirrors of m-c (e.g.
github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev and github.com/mozilla/gecko-projects)
are not updating, and are stuck on a changeset from sometime on March
24. Bug 1350696 is open for the investigation.
Cheers,
kats
___
de
On 3/25/17 2:06 PM, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote:
I don't think there's any benefit of keeping untested and unused stuff
in the tree, but if I got it wrong, or anyone has any concern, please
speak.
Removing this makes sense to me.
-Boris
___
dev-platfo
Hi Firefox devs!
We just landed the final change that culminates the 3 month long major refactor
of how Gecko handles language selection [0] (pending autoland->central).
We now have a single new API - mozilla::intl::LocaleService [1] (and
mozILocaleService [2]) - which centralizes all operation
On 22/03/2017 2:34 PM, Botond Ballo wrote:
Now that this change has hit the release channel, we've started
receiving feedback from a wider range of users, a lot of it in bug
1345661 [1].
I believe the feedback in that thread brings some new information to
the table that we weren't aware of when
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> Another option would be talking to the maintainers of libvoikko and
> seeing if they would be open to maintaining the Mozilla bindings,
I started a fact-finding thread on the libvoikko list:
http://lists.puimula.org/pipermail/libvoikko/2017-
11 matches
Mail list logo
