On 24/09/12 20:06, Jason Smith wrote:
3. For v1, we probably need to still stick to the original plan for
the UA that does include Android in the UA, even though that's
sub-optimal to receive Android specific content. We should move to
the optimal UA in long-term though without the platform
3. For v1, we probably need to still stick to the original plan for
the UA that does include Android in the UA, even though that's
sub-optimal to receive Android specific content. We should move to
the optimal UA in long-term though without the platform identifier.
Do we really think we
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Indeed. I think this is a somewhat different issue than net
neutrality. With net neutrality there's a middle party trying to build
a business model by disrupting the traffic between a user and the
content the user is
2012/9/21 Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Indeed. I think this is a somewhat different issue than net
neutrality. With net neutrality there's a middle party trying to build
a business model by disrupting the traffic between
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Benjamin Smedberg
benja...@smedbergs.us wrote:
On 9/19/2012 2:12 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
FWIW, when preferential
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
For Firefox OS, we are getting requests from partners to add tokens to
the UA string which identify the hardware device on which Firefox OS
is running.
We already had this debate for Firefox for Android. I think we should
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
Since Firefox OS is openly accessible to hardware vendors, wouldn't it
be easy for them to override any decision made by Mozilla if they or
their content partners would prefer it that way?
The code is available, but it
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
* App stores only want to deliver applications to devices which they
know will run on the device.
This would make sense in an Apple-esque walled garden with relatively
few different device models. However, if Mozilla's app
Jonas Sicking schrieb:
For Firefox OS, we are getting requests from partners to add tokens to
the UA string which identify the hardware device on which Firefox OS
is running.
I think using the UA is surely the wrong place for this. If we allow the
models that want to be achieved with this at
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
* Some content providers strike deals with hardware manufacturers
which allow devices made by the manufacturer to access content for
free. One way that this is implemented is by looking for tokens in UA
strings and serve
On 09/13/12 02:27 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
For Firefox OS, we are getting requests from partners to add tokens to
the UA string which identify the hardware device on which Firefox OS
is running.
I am very far from an expert here, but I recall during some discussions
a few years ago that
11 matches
Mail list logo
