Re: Doxygen output?

2017-02-27 Thread Andrew Sutherland
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017, at 04:42 PM, Andrew Sutherland wrote: > A sketch first steps implementation would be: I took a shot at this. The pull request with details is at https://github.com/bill-mccloskey/searchfox/pull/11 and hopefully self-explanatory screenshots are here:

Re: Doxygen output?

2017-02-24 Thread Benoit Girard
ALSE otherwise > */ > > > Anyway, they're mainly useful when generated websites/documents are > readily available, which it seems isn't the case (anymore). > > Right. I'm trying to assess how much effort I should put into writing > Doxygen-formatted docs, and if w

Re: Doxygen output?

2017-02-22 Thread Henri Sivonen
> Anyway, they're mainly useful when generated websites/documents are readily > available, which it seems isn't the case (anymore). Right. I'm trying to assess how much effort I should put into writing Doxygen-formatted docs, and if we aren't really publishing Doxygen output, I feel like it'

Re: Doxygen output?

2017-02-21 Thread Eric Rahm
I was just thinking about this as I probably wouldn't use the standard doxygen output much, but can definitely see the usefulness when integrated into our code indexers which I use quite often. Most useful to me would be: - @param doc when hovering over a param (in function, or when calling

Re: Doxygen output?

2017-02-21 Thread Andrew Sutherland
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017, at 03:13 PM, Bill McCloskey wrote: > I've been thinking about how to integrate documentation into Searchfox. > One > obvious thing is to allow it to display Markdown files and > reStructuredText. I wonder if it could do something useful with Doxygen > comments though? Is this

Re: Doxygen output?

2017-02-21 Thread Bill McCloskey
> > > > The code used to create it is here: > > https://github.com/bgirard/doxygen-mozilla > > > > > > On 20-Feb-17 2:05, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > > Our comments mostly try to follow the Doxygen format, and MDN says > > > that the documentat

Re: Doxygen output?

2017-02-21 Thread Ted Mielczarek
i Sivonen wrote: > > Our comments mostly try to follow the Doxygen format, and MDN says > > that the documentation team has a tool for importing Doxygen-formatted > > IDL comments into MDN articles. > > > > Other than that, is Doxygen output from m-c input being published an

Re: Doxygen output?

2017-02-20 Thread gsquelart
IDL comments into MDN articles. > > Other than that, is Doxygen output from m-c input being published anywhere? > > https://people-mozilla.org/~bgirard/doxygen/gfx/ is 404 these days. > > -- > Henri Sivonen > hsiv...@hsivonen.fi > https://hsivonen.fi/ _

Re: Doxygen output?

2017-02-20 Thread Milan Sreckovic
/doxygen-mozilla On 20-Feb-17 2:05, Henri Sivonen wrote: Our comments mostly try to follow the Doxygen format, and MDN says that the documentation team has a tool for importing Doxygen-formatted IDL comments into MDN articles. Other than that, is Doxygen output from m-c input being published anywhere

Doxygen output?

2017-02-19 Thread Henri Sivonen
Our comments mostly try to follow the Doxygen format, and MDN says that the documentation team has a tool for importing Doxygen-formatted IDL comments into MDN articles. Other than that, is Doxygen output from m-c input being published anywhere? https://people-mozilla.org/~bgirard/doxygen/gfx