Le 31 mars 2015 à 08:14, James Graham a écrit :
> If you just mean that the specifics of this analysis have all been done
> in Blink then yes,
That's all. That was context.
> very general lessons in there about the perf-destroying things that authors
> do, which provides an indication of where
On 30/03/15 23:55, Karl Dubost wrote:
>
> Le 31 mars 2015 à 07:43, James Graham a écrit :
>> There is also a view with some extra comments at [1] which are worth
>> reading.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K-mKOqiUiSjgZTEscBLjtjd6E67oiK8H2ztOiq5tigk/view#
>
>
> And to not forge
Le 31 mars 2015 à 07:43, James Graham a écrit :
> There is also a view with some extra comments at [1] which are worth
> reading.
>
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K-mKOqiUiSjgZTEscBLjtjd6E67oiK8H2ztOiq5tigk/view#
And to not forget the title, if people missed the topic of that emai
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Robert O'Callahan
wrote:
> This is a quick read and an interesting analysis of how various sites fail
> to achieve acceptable performance on mobile:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K-mKOqiUiSjgZTEscBLjtjd6E67oiK8H2ztOiq5tigk/pub
>
One clear message: bloc
On 30/03/15 22:49, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> This is a quick read and an interesting analysis of how various sites fail
> to achieve acceptable performance on mobile:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K-mKOqiUiSjgZTEscBLjtjd6E67oiK8H2ztOiq5tigk/pub
There is also a view with some extra comment
This is a quick read and an interesting analysis of how various sites fail
to achieve acceptable performance on mobile:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K-mKOqiUiSjgZTEscBLjtjd6E67oiK8H2ztOiq5tigk/pub
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao
6 matches
Mail list logo
