Gregory Szorc wrote:
Please read http://www.conifersystems.com/whitepapers/gnu-make/.
after a command fails, |make| does not delete the partially built
output file
.DELETE_ON_ERROR was added to address this.
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
Hi Gregory
Please read http://www.conifersystems.com/whitepapers/gnu-make/. That is
one of my go to articles for explaining why make sucks.
I would not point people to this article as it is flawed. I won't go
through the points it mentions. Some are relevant, others aren't, and
some probably
Hi Michael,
Thank you for providing more information on the topic.
[1] http://gittup.org/tup/build_system_rules_and_algorithms.pdf
That was an interesting read and the numbers are quite impressive.
However I'm skeptical of the overall approach, as it seems to require a
considerable amount of
On 11/27/14 1:05 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thank you for providing more information on the topic.
[1] http://gittup.org/tup/build_system_rules_and_algorithms.pdf
That was an interesting read and the numbers are quite impressive.
However I'm skeptical of the overall approach,
On 11/26/14 10:58 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 26.11.2014 um 17:35 schrieb Michael Shal:
Would it make sense to check in some of the libraries we build that we very
rarely change, and that don’t have a lot of configure dependencies people
twiddle with? (icu, pixman, cairo, vp8, vp9).
On 11/26/14 2:36 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 08:48:05AM -0800, Gregory Szorc wrote:
In the high-level approach, you recognize what the final output is and jump
straight to fetching that. e.g. if all you really need is libxul, you'll
fetch libxul.so. None of this intermediary
On 27/11/2014 00:03, Gregory Szorc wrote:
Yes, people on this list generally care about C++. However, there is
a very large group - most of the Firefox Team and a large amount of
Firefox OS developers - who don't. To them, C++, libxul, others libs
are 10+ minutes of CPU wall time before they
- Original Message -
On 11/26/14 6:55 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
On 27/11/2014 00:03, Gregory Szorc wrote:
Yes, people on this list generally care about C++. However, there is
a very large group - most of the Firefox Team and a large amount of
Firefox OS developers - who don't. To
Would it make sense to check in some of the libraries we build that we very
rarely change, and that don’t have a lot of configure dependencies people
twiddle with? (icu, pixman, cairo, vp8, vp9). This could speed up build times
in our infrastructure and for developers. This doesn’t have to be
9 matches
Mail list logo
