On Thursday, May 12, 2016 at 5:44:32 PM UTC-5, khag...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, May 12, 2016 at 11:47:15 PM UTC+2, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
> > Lawrence Mandel writes:
> >
> > > Do we need this criteria?
> > >
> > > RAM - Does it hurt to move an instance that has <4GB?
> >
> > Yes. OOM will
On Friday, May 13, 2016 at 7:35:52 AM UTC-5, Ben Hearsum wrote:
> On 2016-05-12 06:44 PM, khagar...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 12, 2016 at 11:47:15 PM UTC+2, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
> >> Lawrence Mandel writes:
> >>
> >>> Do we need this criteria?
> >>>
> >>> RAM - Does it hurt to move an
I'm just a Developer Edition/Beta user and I have a Windows 10 system. That
said, you did ask for opinions from a 'broader audience', so I guess I count.
Here are my thoughts such as they are.
1) Mozilla supported Windows 95 for 6 years (1.5.0.12 in 2007) after its last
update (2001), Windows 9
On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 1:33:06 AM UTC-5, Peter Dolanjski wrote:
> Thanks for taking the time to provide thorough feedback.
>
> 3) For Windows Vista, I don't see where the fire is. I realize that it has
> > a vastly smaller user base, but it is close to Window 7 code base and API
> > wise.
On Friday, October 21, 2016 at 1:11:16 PM UTC-5, Kyle Huey wrote:
> No. These machines should not be on the Internet anymore. If the
> operating system vendor is no longer supporting their product with
> security releases an out of date TLS stack is a minor problem compared
> to the remote code e
On Saturday, October 22, 2016 at 4:27:32 AM UTC-5, Martin Thomson wrote:
> Yep, I just designated a relatives machine to recycling on that basis.
> I could have updated the OS, but they had other better options, so
> we're reclaiming the space. I know that neither option is that
> pleasant, but it
On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 3:12:31 AM UTC-5, Gervase Markham wrote:
> On 22/10/16 10:16, keithgallis...@gmail.com wrote:
> > My concern is that by killing digital certificate updates and TLS
> > updates, still in use machines whose main purpose is Internet access
> > are essentially bricked.
>
On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 3:22:10 AM UTC-5, Gervase Markham wrote:
> On 24/10/16 18:44, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > This seems to assume facts not in evidence, namely that people will stop
> > using those
> > machines rather than just living with whatever the last version we updated
> > them to.
8 matches
Mail list logo
