On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 22:16:27 +
Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy
wrote:
> Even better than that (and many thanks to Andrew Ayer for suggesting
> this idea)...
>
> To enable folks to do more thorough statistical analysis, I've
> produced another, richer summary table (named
> serial_numb
t; -Original Message-
> From: dev-security-policy
> On
> Behalf Of Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 6:16 PM
> To: Hector Martin 'marcan' ;
> mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
> Cc: Kurt Roeckx
> Subject: Re:
6lKoc/edit#gid=1093195185
-Original Message-
From: dev-security-policy On
Behalf Of Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 6:16 PM
To: Hector Martin 'marcan' ;
mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
Cc: Kurt Roeckx
Subject: Re: Survey of (pote
On 18/03/2019 21:11, Hector Martin 'marcan' wrote:
> On 19/03/2019 02.17, Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy wrote:
>> On 18/03/2019 17:05, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 03:30:37PM +, Rob Stradling via
>>> dev-security-policy wrote:
When a value in column E is 100
On 19/03/2019 02.17, Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy wrote:
> On 18/03/2019 17:05, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 03:30:37PM +, Rob Stradling via
>> dev-security-policy wrote:
>>>
>>> When a value in column E is 100%, this is pretty solid evidence of
>>> noncompliance with
On 18/03/2019 17:05, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 03:30:37PM +, Rob Stradling via
> dev-security-policy wrote:
>>
>> When a value in column E is 100%, this is pretty solid evidence of
>> noncompliance with BR 7.1.
>> When the values in column E and G are both approximately 50%,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 03:30:37PM +, Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy
wrote:
>
> When a value in column E is 100%, this is pretty solid evidence of
> noncompliance with BR 7.1.
> When the values in column E and G are both approximately 50%, this
> suggests (but does not prove) that th
On 18/03/2019 15:43, Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy wrote:
> On 18/03/2019 15:30, Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy wrote:
>
>> On 14/03/2019 10:59, Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy wrote:
>>> On 13/03/2019 22:28, Richard Moore via dev-security-policy wrote:
>>
If any other C
On 18/03/2019 15:30, Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy wrote:
> On 14/03/2019 10:59, Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy wrote:
>> On 13/03/2019 22:28, Richard Moore via dev-security-policy wrote:
>
>>> If any other CA wants to check theirs before someone else does, then now is
>>> surely
9 matches
Mail list logo