In this case, no any CA named as letsencrypt similar name, and no any CA want
to impersonate, most CA program require the root CA have a unique friendly
name in the CA program.
Best Regards,
Richard
-Original Message-
From: dev-security-policy
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:58 PM, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I already have reported the following issue in the bug tracking system and
> now have been told that the bug has been closed and that I should put it
> for discussion here.
>
> Please note that I am no way a security expert,
Hi Gerv,
> It's never come up. But I think we would be reluctant to intervene;
Thank you for that answer. I understand it.
> there are other mechanisms for sorting out such disputes, and it's not
> our job to interpret or enforce trademark law or domain name dispute
> resolution law.
There are
On 2016-12-22 08:58, i...@binarus.de wrote:
Hi all,
I already have reported the following issue in the bug tracking system and now
have been told that the bug has been closed and that I should put it for
discussion here.
Please note that I am no way a security expert, so please don't blame
On 21/12/16 12:42, tdel...@gmail.com wrote:
> I think Mozilla still doesn't answer my first question:what is the
> position of Mozilla regarding CA that act in bad faith regarding the
> usage of the names associated with others CA (like, registering such
> trademarks or domains) ?
It's never come
Hi all,
I already have reported the following issue in the bug tracking system and now
have been told that the bug has been closed and that I should put it for
discussion here.
Please note that I am no way a security expert, so please don't blame me if the
following is wrong. But I am sort of
6 matches
Mail list logo