On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 08:45:34AM -0700, sandybar497--- via
dev-security-policy wrote:
> Additionally, Sectigo referred to pwnedkeys as
> some sort of authority that they say it’s not compromised.
Bless their little cotton socks, pwnedkeys is now such an authority that
Sectigo thinks I've got ev
Forwarded Message
Subject: Summary of May 2020 Outdated Audit Statements for Intermediate
Certs
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 14:00:08 + (GMT)
CA Owner: SECOM Trust Systems CO., LTD.
- Certificate Name: SECOM Passport for Web MH CA
SHA-256 Fingerprint:
4E62A252592F9D71FFE2037
On 5/4/20 9:31 AM, Corey Bonnell wrote:
Thank you very much for the clarifications. If I'm understanding correctly, it
sounds like Mozilla is considering to add sub-items of item 4 on the survey as
Mozilla Root Program requirements if the associated CAB Forum ballot does not
pass. However, there
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:35 PM sandybar497--- via dev-security-policy
wrote:
>
> I submitted a compromised key report to Sectigo [ssl_ab...@sectigo.com] on 1
> May 2020 at 2:03pm UTC but Sectigo failed to revoke the certificate per
> cab-forum guidelines [4.9.1.1. Reasons for Revoking a Subscri
I submitted a compromised key report to Sectigo [ssl_ab...@sectigo.com] on 1
May 2020 at 2:03pm UTC but Sectigo failed to revoke the certificate per
cab-forum guidelines [4.9.1.1. Reasons for Revoking a Subscriber Certificate].
Upon submitting my report [case ref: _00D1N2Ljih._5003l11VztU], I r
5 matches
Mail list logo