Hi Ryan,
thanks for your post. And certainly yes: it’s our first goal to serve the needs
of our actual consumers. The browsers belong to those in the front row. We are
aware of that as we are aware that there is space for improvement for the
council.
With regard to your statement to our webpage
All,
on behalf of the Accredited Conformity Assessment Bodies council we would like
to provide the following background information to the guideline “Verifying
ETSI Auditor Qualification” as stated here:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Audit_Statements#Verifying_ETSI_Auditor_Qualifications
The guid
Situation from ACAB'c ETSI auditors point of view:
On one hand it is quite simple: if the auditor cannot perform the audit as
foreseen in the certification program no certificate can be issued. In case a
surveillance audit cannot be performed, the certification body must withdraw
the affected c
Dear all,
just a short note on that with regard to auditing and Audit Attestations based
upon ETSI: throughout the audit we check the incidents of the current audit
period as documented by the CA (have they been addressed at a sufficient level,
have the measures taken proven that they are suffi
Dear all,
on behalf of ACAB’c we like to comment on that as follows:
We would like to clarify the following normative points defined by the EA and
by the ISO/IEC 17065/ETSI/eIDAS:
I. Accreditation of CAB:
- The eIDAS/ETSI accredited CAB in Europe are in general all accredited
according IS
Dear all,
this is a joint response from ETSI ESI and ACABc:
ETSI have published a supplement to its audit requirements specifically to
address specific requirements of Mozilla, and other CA/Browser Forum members,
for auditing Trust Service Providers that issue Publicly-Trusted Certificates
TS 1
6 matches
Mail list logo
