Bonjour,
Le lundi 9 janvier 2017 18:02:57 UTC+1, Jeremy Rowley a écrit :
> Not many websites, but all of the Belgium ID cards would end up being
> revoked.
Not exactly. The "Belgium Root CAx" CA certificates issued by Cybertrust would
be revoked, but since these CAs also have self-signed certif
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 10:02 AM
To: Jeremy Rowley ;
mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: Update on transition of the Verizon roots and issuance of SHA1
certificates
On 09/01/17 16:35, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
> Hi Rob - thanks for following up.
>
> The Belgium root
It probably should not be same as parent. Ben will update it.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Stradling [mailto:rob.stradl...@comodo.com]
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 10:02 AM
To: Jeremy Rowley ;
mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: Update on transition of the Verizon
On 09/01/17 16:35, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
Hi Rob - thanks for following up.
The Belgium root was granted an extension by the browsers until January 15th
to complete the audit and January 31st to submit the audit report. We are
still told they are hosted by Verizon and, considering the audit progre
transition of the Verizon roots and issuance of SHA1
certificates
On 2017-01-09 17:28, Rob Stradling wrote:
> On 03/11/16 19:34, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jeremy.
>
>> 7. The Belgium government is our biggest challenge in migrating
>> Verizon customers. With over 20 i
On 2017-01-09 17:28, Rob Stradling wrote:
On 03/11/16 19:34, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
Hi Jeremy.
7. The Belgium government is our biggest challenge in migrating
Verizon customers. With over 20 issuing CAs, Belgium has the largest
outstanding non-compliant infrastructure. The operators have
.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Stradling [mailto:rob.stradl...@comodo.com]
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 9:28 AM
To: Jeremy Rowley ;
mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: Update on transition of the Verizon roots and issuance of SHA1
certificates
On 03/11/16 19:34, Jeremy
On 03/11/16 19:34, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
Hi Jeremy.
7. The Belgium government is our biggest challenge in migrating Verizon
customers. With over 20 issuing CAs, Belgium has the largest outstanding
non-compliant infrastructure. The operators have also claimed that revoking
their issuing
This looks like a very accurate representation of the data protection European
regulations. I have the same view.
Not so easy to implement but if it is implemented correctly, I think very few
people will disagree with the essence of this regulation.
Dimitris.
--
Sent from my mobile device.
On Friday, 4 November 2016 19:37:07 UTC, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
> We also like the public disclosures CT requires as its been essential in
> identifying issuing CAs and non-compliances. That's probably not a surprise
> as we've always strongly supported CT. I do see the need for name redaction
>
Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 1:36 PM
To: Peter Bowen
Cc: mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: RE: Update on transition of the Verizon roots and issuance of SHA1
certificates
Thanks Peter for the questions. The answers are listed below:
First, a couple of questions about Dig
Thanks Peter for the questions. The answers are listed below:
First, a couple of questions about DigiCert itself. The press release at
https://thomabravo.com/2015/10/22/thoma-bravo-completes-acquisition-of-majority-stake-in-digicert/
says that Thoma Bravo acquired a majority stake in DigiCert i
Hi Jeremy,
Thanks for posting this. Mozilla had been concerned for some time about
the level of BR compliance of the Verizon-controlled PKI and their
seeming difficulties in bringing their many sub-CAs into compliance.
When DigiCert approached us when researching the potential acquisition,
they as
unces+jeremy.rowley=digicert@lists.mozilla.org]
On Behalf Of Han Yuwei
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 6:14 PM
To: mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: Update on transition of the Verizon roots and issuance of SHA1
certificates
在 2016年11月4日星期五 UTC+8上午3:52:23，Jeremy Row
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Jeremy Rowley
wrote:
> This email is intended to gather public and browser feedback on how we are
> handling the transitioning Verizon's customers to DigiCert and share with
> everyone the plan for when all non-DigiCert hosted sub CAs will be fully
> compliant with
在 2016年11月4日星期五 UTC+8上午3:52:23，Jeremy Rowley写道：
> Resent without a signature
>
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> This email is intended to gather public and browser feedback on how we are
> handling the transitioning Verizon's customers to DigiCert and share with
> everyone the plan for when a
16 matches
Mail list logo
