I have sent the email to the following CAs.
Root Owner | # Certs still to add to Salesforce
Actalis 2
Asseco Data Systems S.A. (previously Unizeto Certum)1
Atos3
Autoridad de Certificacion Firmaprofesional 6
Camerfirma 19
certSIGN6
China Internet Network
On Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 4:14:35 AM UTC-7, Rob Stradling wrote:
> So, to ensure that no CA can claim that they didn't know, I'd like to
> see the "must keep disclosing intermediates to Salesforce on an ongoing
> basis" requirement explicitly stated:
> 1. in the next version of the
On 27/10/16 09:31, Gervase Markham wrote:
> On 26/10/16 22:02, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
>> Please see
>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:SalesforceCommunity#CA_Community_in_Salesforce
>> and let me know if you still think we need to add a sentence to the
>> wiki page stating that CAs are expected to
To be clear, this particular email will just be going to the CAs listed here:
https://crt.sh/mozilla-disclosures#undisclosedsummary
The intention of the email is to remind those CAs that they have an overdue
action item, that needs to be completed. It is not the intention of this email
to
On 21/10/2016 00:24, Gervase Markham wrote:
On 20/10/16 15:05, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
You are receiving this email because our records indicate that there
are non-technically-constrained intermediate certificates that chain
up to your root certificates that are included in Mozilla’s program
onduct a search.
>
> From: Peter Bowen
> Sent: 10/21/2016 10:08 AM
> To: Kathleen Wilson
> Cc: mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
> Subject: Re: Draft Email - Non-Disclosed SubCAs
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Kathleen Wilso
On 20/10/16 13:09, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> Next week I expect to have a better capability for sending
> notification emails to CAs. The first email I would like to try this
> new tool on is regarding the CAs who have not disclosed all of their
> non-technically-constrained intermediate
:08 AM
To: Kathleen Wilson<mailto:kwil...@mozilla.com>
Cc:
mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org<mailto:mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org>
Subject: Re: Draft Email - Non-Disclosed SubCAs
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Kathleen Wilson <kwil...@mozilla.com> wr
On 20/10/16 15:05, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> You are receiving this email because our records indicate that there
> are non-technically-constrained intermediate certificates that chain
> up to your root certificates that are included in Mozilla’s program
> that have not been entered into the CA
On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 2:24:19 PM UTC-7, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Does this requirement apply transitively sub-CAs of sub-CAs?
>
> It may make sense to stress explicitly that the “technically
> constrained” refers to properties visible in the certificates
> themselves, not technical
* Kathleen Wilson:
> The following was stated in Mozilla’s March 2016 CA Communication
> (https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:Communications#March_2016):
> Beginning with Version 2.1 of Mozilla's CA Certificate Policy, for any
> certificate which directly or transitively chains to the root
> certificates
11 matches
Mail list logo
