Sounds like the sticking point is finding someone who will agree to
keep them alive. There's no point in turning them on if they're going
to be broken for weeks/months at a stretch.
From skimming the discussion, one thing that's unclear to me is if
we're talking about Windows shell builds, or
On 2/13/14, 12:18 PM, Steve Fink wrote:
Sounds like the sticking point is finding someone who will agree to
keep them alive. There's no point in turning them on if they're going
to be broken for weeks/months at a stretch.
This can be mitigated as per Valgrind by having per-commit builds as
Some may believe it is time for SpiderMonkey standalone builds for
Windows to return, as personally I am admittedly increasingly frustrated
at the increasing numbers of Windows-specific build failures. (More may
come as :glandium points out, as long as Windows standalone builds are
not on
3 matches
Mail list logo
