I'll try to fix the line-wrapping. I also want to add a note about this
being the last update to support Java 6, and Hadoop 1, also. So, I'll make
a modification to that on the release notes, before sending this out.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:47 AM Mike Miller
wrote:
Perhaps its how you sent the message but I am getting odd line
breaks/wrapping. Several lines only have one word on them... "update",
"concern" in the first paragraph and "so", "when" in the second paragraph.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Michael Wall wrote:
> Here is a
Here is a draft, munged together from the release notes for 1.6.6 and the
1.7.2 announcement. I checked several mirrors and it seems the artifacts
have propagated. Christopher, when you get in one of us can send this out.
Mike
-
The Accumulo team is proud to announce the
I can take a stab at now. I'll reply with the draft for review before it
goes out.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Christopher wrote:
> Okay, everything is done on the website. We still need to send out an
> announcement. Unfortunately, I have a few other tasks to take
Okay, everything is done on the website. We still need to send out an
announcement. Unfortunately, I have a few other tasks to take care of, so
if somebody else wants to volunteer to do that, I'd very much appreciate it.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:29 PM Christopher wrote:
>
Still working on the release notes and updating the site. Everything else
is done, I think.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:32 PM Christopher wrote:
> This vote passes with +3 (not including Mike's late +1). I'll push things
> out to dist tonight and try to put together some
This vote passes with +3 (not including Mike's late +1). I'll push things
out to dist tonight and try to put together some release notes and update
the downloads page tomorrow.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016, 20:21 Michael Wall wrote:
> I know I am late, but I have a +1 too. Did some
I know I am late, but I have a +1 too. Did some of the same checks
everyone else did. Did not have time to run to CI.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
> +1
>
> * good sig
> * was able to run a single node instance from tar ball, load some
> data,
+1
* good sig
* was able to run a single node instance from tar ball, load some
data, verify, and view monitor
* was able to build Fluo against the artifacts in staging repo
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Christopher wrote:
> Accumulo Developers,
>
> Please consider
+1
* Successfully ran all ITs on Hadoop 1 and Hadoop 2 (saw ACCUMULO-4457
occasionally, but don't think it's worth fixing in 1.6)
* Verified sigs/hashes
* Checked dist/dev area to match artifacts in staging repo
* Checked binary tarball for matching jars from staging repo
* Checked LICENSE/NOTICE
If anybody's interested, I also have the non-maven-only artifacts staged at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/accumulo/ (just the tarballs and
sigs/hashes, which will go to dist/release if vote passes). An extra thing
to check would be to ensure that they match byte-for-byte with their
+1 (binding)
* Verified changes over 1.6.6-rc1
* Verified repo contains 2073a07460603ebdb2caec3f6b7b863293cbfadb
* `mvn package` && `mvn package -Dhadoop.profile=1` both pass
* xsums/sigs OK
- Josh
Christopher wrote:
Accumulo Developers,
Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo
12 matches
Mail list logo