GitHub user andytaylor opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1346
ARTEMIS-1211 - Allow local transactions when no jta in Resource Adapter
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1211
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by runn
GitHub user gaohoward opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1347
ARTEMIS-1221 Duplicated ID causes LargeMessage lost at backup
When a large message is replicated to backup, a pendingID is generated
when the large message is finished. This pendingI
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1337
@michaelandrepearce Thanks Michael. I'll do another full suite run here.
Once it passes I will merge. Thanks again for the great work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1342
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Github user andytaylor closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1339
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1346
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1344
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1343
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
GitHub user andytaylor opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1348
ARTEMIS-1237 - Hard coded timeout on Journal file open
Make timeout configurable
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1237
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1345
@michaelandrepearce Sure. I get the configuration management tool use case.
Two comments:
1. Does it make sense to enable this at the address-settings level vs just
a global w
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1337
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1345
@mtaylor
1) this was first approach i did actually, but on thought, it might be that
you have a subset you maybe not want to manage this way (e.g. some reason some
sub sect
Github user andytaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1345
The issue that needs solving is the fact we have this queues that exist in
both the bindings journal and the config and some that are only in the journal
and we never automatically remo
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1345
@andytaylor
re:
> My opinion removing queues should never be done automatically even if
that is a configured flag.
We actually would want to automati
Github user andytaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1345
I can only reiterate that removing queues that have messages in my view is
a bad thing and we shouldn't allow it. At least not without any thought as to
what we should do with the messa
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1345
@andytaylor
> I can only reiterate that removing queues that have messages in my view
is a bad thing and we shouldn't allow it. At least not without any thought as
to w
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1345
Having this policy driven seems to be the way to satisfy both requirements.
It also still makes sense if we do go down the route of storing
queues/addresses in config only (although as @m
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1345
@mtaylor makes sense.
Have update this PR with suggested OFF, FORCE options on the
address-settings.
Updated also config-reload.md to document the feature, indicating th
GitHub user michaelandrepearce opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1349
ARTEMIS-1205: AMQP Shared Durable Subscriber - Document Update
Update documents for new configuration toggle for
'amqp-use-core-subscription-naming '
You can merge this pull r
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1348#discussion_r122838823
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/resources/schema/artemis-configuration.xsd ---
@@ -688,6 +688,15 @@
GitHub user gaohoward opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1350
ARTEMIS-1240 Disconnect at client side on decoding error
When a broken packet arrives at client side it causes decoding error.
Currently artemis doesn't handle it properly. It should
21 matches
Mail list logo
