[GitHub] tilgovi commented on issue #24: LICENSE and NOTICE in packages

tilgovi commented on issue #24: LICENSE and NOTICE in packages URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/24#issuecomment-376985238 My read is that we should have a NOTICE file even if it contains nothing but our header. Per the ASL, the content of that NOTICE file would

[GitHub] tilgovi commented on issue #24: LICENSE and NOTICE in packages

tilgovi commented on issue #24: LICENSE and NOTICE in packages URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/24#issuecomment-372765120 That sounds right to me. Even the Babel-transipled source is source to me and I got help from a Babel maintainer yesterday to preserve license

[GitHub] tilgovi commented on issue #24: LICENSE and NOTICE in packages

tilgovi commented on issue #24: LICENSE and NOTICE in packages URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/24#issuecomment-372542013 @BigBlueHat how do you think we should handle this? Do we want to treat the packages as sub-projects and put LICENSE + NOTICE in each one? Or