Yeah, it was the hash improvement (in fact, I use that exact
algo w/ proxy) as well as the pool enhancements (esp related
to fragments) which would be super cool to pull in.
> On Nov 20, 2015, at 6:08 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Yann Ylavic
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 21.11.2015 09:31, Graham Leggett wrote:
>> On 21 Nov 2015, at 12:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>>
>>> Any objections to picking this up for APR 1.next/2.0?
>>>
>>> It seems that httpd isn't the
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
On 21 Nov 2015, at 12:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Any objections to picking this up for APR 1.next/2.0?
>
> It seems that httpd isn't the only one who wants to be strict about
> case-insensitive token string recognition, and non-POSIX char case
> gets weird quickly.
On 21.11.2015 09:31, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 21 Nov 2015, at 12:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
>> Any objections to picking this up for APR 1.next/2.0?
>>
>> It seems that httpd isn't the only one who wants to be strict about
>> case-insensitive token string