Re: Optimization, modern C and APR 2.0 onwards

2015-11-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
Yeah, it was the hash improvement (in fact, I use that exact algo w/ proxy) as well as the pool enhancements (esp related to fragments) which would be super cool to pull in. > On Nov 20, 2015, at 6:08 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Yann Ylavic

Re: Provide our own impl of str[n]casecmp()?

2015-11-21 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 21.11.2015 09:31, Graham Leggett wrote: >> On 21 Nov 2015, at 12:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >>> Any objections to picking this up for APR 1.next/2.0? >>> >>> It seems that httpd isn't the

Bug report for APR [2015/11/22]

2015-11-21 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: Provide our own impl of str[n]casecmp()?

2015-11-21 Thread Graham Leggett
On 21 Nov 2015, at 12:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Any objections to picking this up for APR 1.next/2.0? > > It seems that httpd isn't the only one who wants to be strict about > case-insensitive token string recognition, and non-POSIX char case > gets weird quickly.

Re: Provide our own impl of str[n]casecmp()?

2015-11-21 Thread Branko Čibej
On 21.11.2015 09:31, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 21 Nov 2015, at 12:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > >> Any objections to picking this up for APR 1.next/2.0? >> >> It seems that httpd isn't the only one who wants to be strict about >> case-insensitive token string