Hi all,
May I have an idea approximately when APR-1.6.4 will be released?
Thank you very much.
> On 29 Aug 2018, at 09:25, Eric . wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> May I have an idea approximately when APR-1.6.4 will be released?
> Thank you very much.
If you read this list, you know exactly the same as all of us.
Are you running on Solaris and looking for that poll patch,
or do you have some oth
> On 27 Aug 2018, at 04:18, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> Let's take a few more days on this. We are getting more and more good
> suggestions as git merge requests to girhub.com/apache/app that are worth a
> look.
What do you envisage doing with those days?
The motivation for a release is to
Speaking of suggestions, may I please suggest closing a glaring security
hole in apr_dbd_mysql, per
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62342? I have provided
diffs for 1.5 -- because my organization uses RHEL 7, which uses APR 1.5
-- and 2.0 -- because someone on this list instructe
> On 29 Aug 2018, at 16:08, William Kimball Jr.
> wrote:
>
> Speaking of suggestions, may I please suggest closing a glaring security hole
> in apr_dbd_mysql, per https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62342? I
> have provided diffs for 1.5 -- because my organization uses RHEL 7, whi
Yes, I'm looking for that Solaris patch.
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 17:53, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> > On 29 Aug 2018, at 09:25, Eric . wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > May I have an idea approximately when APR-1.6.4 will be released?
> > Thank you very much.
>
> If you read this list, you know exactly the
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder apr-x64-macosx-trunk while
building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-x64-macosx-trunk/builds/153
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: svn-x64-macosx-dgvrs
Build Reason: The AnyBr
First;
Pull request #5 https://github.com/apache/apr/pull/5/files
corresponds to https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61985
Yann and I are neutral on dodging (fd == -1), what do others think?
This would be a trivial one-line fix if we adopt it.
Second;
Are we comfortable adding a depende
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:30 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
>
> Second;
> Are we comfortable adding a dependency on autoconf-archive?
> This macro below dates back to 2010. If we are not, I can
> revert this.
>
And note I'll need to tweak the buildcheck.sh if we choose to keep
the dependency, it
This was my workaround for 1.6.x, more eyeballs and feedback welcome.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 12:23 AM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
>
> Nick, please note your error in line 58 here is still not cured;
>
>
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/branches/1.6.x/time/win32/time.c?view=annotate
>
> This w
10 matches
Mail list logo
