[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14610764#comment-14610764
]
Zoltan Farkas commented on AVRO-1667:
-
A tough one, it was tuff to fix this more than a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14610769#comment-14610769
]
Ryan Blue commented on AVRO-1667:
-
I think I see what you're saying: when flattening a
+1 for a 1.8.0 release. What kind of timeline for the first RC are you
looking at?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Zoltan Farkas zolyfar...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
I would like to have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1667
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1667 resolved
Hi everyone,
It would be good to do another Avro release soon. I'm happy to create
a release candidate so we can vote on it.
What do folks think about releasing 1.7.8 vs. 1.8.0? There are very
few changes in the 1.7 branch, so it might be best to release 1.8.0
from trunk. There have been enough
Hi,
I would say go for the 1.8.0
Note that there are a few issues that seem appropriate to include for
this one because they relate to a change in 'backwards compatibility:
- AVRO-1586 Build against Hadoop 2
( which should also fix AVRO-1453 Release version of avro-tools
compiled against
I would like to have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1667
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1667 resolved in 1.8.0 if possible.
This issue prevents serializing/deserializing objects with certain schemas…
—Z
On Jul 1, 2015, at 10:50 AM, Niels Basjes ni...@basjes.nl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 for a 1.8.0 release. What kind of timeline for the first RC are you
looking at?
In the next week or so. Hopefully we can decide anything else we'd
like to include and get it reviewed and committed in that time.
On Wed,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14610705#comment-14610705
]
Ryan Blue commented on AVRO-1667:
-
What I'm trying to understand is why the null