Re: Interest in a (virtual) contributor meeting?

2017-02-23 Thread Davor Bonaci
Thanks everyone for your enthusiasms! I'll try to organize something very shortly. On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Agree > > An agenda would be useful. > > Further more, I think it would be great to have minute notes on the > mailing list:

Re: How does SimpleDoFnRunner supports stateful ParDo?

2017-02-23 Thread Shen Li
Hi Kenn, Thanks a lot for explaining. As the SimpleDoFnRunner only takes one StepContext object in its arguments, do you mean the runner should create a new SimpleDoFnRunner for each key? Best, Shen On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > Hi Shen,

tf.Transform library for using TensorFlow with Beam

2017-02-23 Thread Ahmet Altay
Hi all, Yesterday, there was an announcement from TensorFlow community about the new tf.Transform library [1]. It is a library that allows users to define pre-processing pipelines and run using large scale data processing frameworks. It is a library specifically designed to work with Apache Beam.

Re: tf.Transform library for using TensorFlow with Beam

2017-02-23 Thread Davor Bonaci
Beam and TensorFlow coming together -- a big deal for us! On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Ahmet Altay wrote: > Hi all, > > Yesterday, there was an announcement from TensorFlow community about the > new tf.Transform library [1]. It is a library that allows users to

How does SimpleDoFnRunner supports stateful ParDo?

2017-02-23 Thread Shen Li
Hi, I am trying to understand how a runner can support the Stateful ParDo. Currently our runner relies on the SimpleDoFnRunner (Beam-0.5.0). But it cannot pass ParDoTest#testValueStateSideOutput (

Re: Interest in a (virtual) contributor meeting?

2017-02-23 Thread Ismaël Mejía
+1 to do it periodically about different subjects. It is a good idea to have a sort of mini agenda, in the sense that the two previous meetings had really different focus, the first one was about contributors meeting each other and discussion of ongoing work just after the project started on

Re: Interest in a (virtual) contributor meeting?

2017-02-23 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Agree An agenda would be useful. Further more, I think it would be great to have minute notes on the mailing list: remember, if it's not on the mailing list, it never happened ;) My $0.01 ;) Regards JB On 02/23/2017 09:26 AM, Ismaël Mejía wrote: +1 to do it periodically about different