Re: release process: typescript SDK?

2024-04-16 Thread Danny McCormick via dev
I've never published npm artifacts before, but I imagine the hardest part is getting the credentials set up, then it is probably very easy to set up a GitHub Actions workflow to publish

release process: typescript SDK?

2024-04-16 Thread Austin Bennett
Hi Beam Devs, Calling out it looks like our release process for apache-beam for typescript/npm is broken, seemingly the last published release was 2.49.0 about 9 months ago. The other languages look like they are publishing to expected locations. https://www.npmjs.com/package/apache-beam I

Re: release process: typescript SDK?

2024-04-16 Thread Robert Bradshaw via dev
Correct, I've just been pushing these manually, and lately there haven't been many changes to push. I'm all for getting these set up as part of the standard release process. On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 1:22 PM Danny McCormick wrote: > I've never published npm artifacts before, but I imagine the

Re: PCollection#applyWindowingStrategyInternal

2024-04-16 Thread Reuven Lax via dev
Yes, but that's inevitable as stateful ParDo in a sense live outside of most of the window/trigger semantics. Basically a stateful ParDo is the user executing low-level control over these semantics, and controlling output frequency themselves with timers. One could however still propagate the

Re: PCollection#applyWindowingStrategyInternal

2024-04-16 Thread Jan Lukavský
On 4/11/24 18:20, Reuven Lax via dev wrote: I'm not sure it would require all that. A "basic" implementation could be done on top of our existing model. Essentially the user would specify triggers at the sink ParDos, then the runner would walk backwards up the graph, reverse-propagating these

Beam High Priority Issue Report (62)

2024-04-16 Thread beamactions
This is your daily summary of Beam's current high priority issues that may need attention. See https://beam.apache.org/contribute/issue-priorities for the meaning and expectations around issue priorities. Unassigned P1 Issues: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/30966 The PreCommit

Re: [Feature proposal] Java Record Schema inference

2024-04-16 Thread Maciej Szwaja via dev
Thank you Reuven for the response! I'll update the design doc to include adding support for the generic classes. As for the new reflection API that's what I propose in the doc as well, it seems like the right choice. By codegen path you mean using bytebuddy to generate the constructor and the