Re: [NEED HELP] how to revert a PR in branch DSL_SQL

Or another option is solve merge conflict. This might not be the best way. Because once master branch has some changes, we still need to do this same way. I tried merge locally. We could solve conflict files and open PR for that. conflict files are: both modified:

Re: [DISCUSSION] Encouraging more contributions

That's an interesting experiment. From new contributor's aspect, I would see more small feature project ideas (just like rust community do). Since existing beginner issues give new contributors a vague roadmap what they should do next. On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Sourabh Bajaj <

Re: Merge branch DSL_SQL to master

nd developer-facing documentation > > >> > > > > >> > > * A web page[4] is added to describe the usage of SQL DSL and how > it > > >> > works; > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > 3. Have at l

[SQL] Cross Join Operation

Hi everyone, To prove the idea of GSoC project, I was working on some simple TPC-DS queries running with given generated data on direct runner. query example The example is executed with TPC-DS query 9

[SQL] Unsupported features

Hi all, Based on pull/5481 , I manually did a coverage test with TPC-ds queries (65%) and TPC-h queries (100%) and want to see what features Beam SQL is currently not supporting. Test was running on DirectRunner. I want to share the result.​ TPC-DS

Re: [SQL] Unsupported features

really interesting to have this also as part of some kind of > IT for the future. > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 7:43 PM Kai Jiang wrote: > >> Sounds a good idea! I will file the major problems later and use a task >> issue to track. >> >> Best, >> Ka

Re: [SQL] Unsupported features

FYI, Umbrella JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4476 ᐧ ᐧ On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 3:08 PM Kai Jiang wrote: > Ismaël, I was running this naive code snippet > <https://gist.github.com/vectorijk/7c54f90aeebfd6fd9e9d2ee224bfed50>. > Yes, IT would be interestin

Re: [SQL] Unsupported features

ing with sub-tasks for specific problems. > > Regards, > Anton > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 9:12 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > >> This is extremely useful. Thanks for putting so much information together! >> >> Kenn >> >> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:19 AM

Re: Going on leave for a bit

Congrats! Enjoy your family time. Best, Kai On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, 09:11 Alan Myrvold wrote: > Congrats, Kenn and have a great break. > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 9:10 AM Alexey Romanenko > wrote: > >> Best wishes to you and your family, Kenneth! >> >> Alexey >> >> On 26 Jun 2018, at 15:45,

Google Summer of Code Project Intro

Hi Beam Dev, I am Kai. GSoC has announced selected projects last week. During community bonding period, I want to share some basics about this year's project with Apache Beam. Project abstract: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/projects/#6460770829729792 Issue Tracker: BEAM-3783

Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2018 is coming

ale up some examples on different runners to do some optimization, or > > implementing new join algorithms and/or using Calcite's rule system to > > select the right one. I will see about writing these up more clearly. > > > > Kenn > > > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018

Re: Community Examples Repository

Agreed with Rui. We could also add more SQL examples (like, different IOs ) for everyone to get started with. Best, Kai On 2018/08/02 17:40:32, Rui Wang wrote: > I might miss it: are examples to be moved including those which are not > under example/? For example there are some BeamSQL

Re: Beam Docs Contributor

Welcome Rose! ᐧ On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 8:53 PM Rui Wang wrote: > Welcome! > > -Rui > > On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 7:07 PM Griselda Cuevas wrote: > >> Welcome Rose, very glad to have you in the community :) >> >> >> >> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 at 16:29, Ahmet Altay wrote: >> >>> Welcome Rose! Looking

Re: Issues with Beam SQL on Spark

d this thread to dev@calcite and to see if we can connect between calcite modules without using the DriverManager. Best, Kai ᐧ On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 1:04 PM Kai Jiang wrote: > Thank you Andrew! I will take a look at if it is feasible to rewrite > "jdbc:calcite:" in Beam's

Re: Hello Beam Community!!!

Welcome! On Fri, Aug 3, 2018, 23:59 Rui Wang wrote: > Welcome! > > -Rui > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 11:29 PM Griselda Cuevas wrote: > >> Welcome! >> >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018, 9:44 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >> >>> Welcome aboard ! >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 04/08/2018 04:39,

Re: Status of IntelliJ with Gradle

On 2018/08/22 21:11:06, Xinyu Liu wrote: > We experienced the same issues too in intellij after switching to latest > version. I did the trick Luke mentioned before to include the > beam-model-fn-execution and beam-model-job-management jars in the dependent > modules to get around

Re: Status of IntelliJ with Gradle

I encountered same error with Xinyu when I was launching unit tests in Intellij. For now, I am only using gradle to test unit tests. Thanks, Kai On 2018/08/22 21:11:06, Xinyu Liu wrote: > We experienced the same issues too in intellij after switching to latest > version. I did the trick Luke

Re: [Vote] Dev wiki engine

+1 Apache Confluence On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 15:18 Lukasz Cwik wrote: > +1 for confluence. > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 3:17 PM Anton Kedin wrote: > >> +1 for Confluence >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 2:56 PM Andrew Pilloud >> wrote: >> >>> +1 Apache Confluence >>> >>> Because .md files in

Re: Issues with Beam SQL on Spark

to connect > between calcite modules). > > Andrew > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:18 PM Kai Jiang wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I met an issue when I ran Beam SQL on Spark. I want to check and see if > > anyone has same issue with me. I believe let beam

Re: Issues with Beam SQL on Spark

sing the problem by relocating calcite's path but > not also modifying the global state it creates. > > Andrew > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:03 PM Kai Jiang wrote: > > > Thanks Andrew! It's really helpful. I'll take a try on shade calcite with > > rewriting the &qu

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Nexmark included to the CI

Hi Etienne, It's awesome for working on these useful dashboards. I am getting TPC-H benchmark running on Flink and Dataflow Runner. I could work on similar dashboards for TPC benchmark after code merged. Also, it's great to have a dashboards for Dataflow. Best, Kai ᐧ On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at

Re: Permissions for confluence

Same question. I think only committers have permission to edit page. Also, looking forward to working on some pages. On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 16:28 Mikhail Gryzykhin wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I believe that last month we decided to keep developers documentation on > Apache confluence wiki

Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2018 is coming

@Kenneth, Thanks for getting back to me! I am excited to hear that you want to be the mentor. Definitely, I am very willing to work on SQL. I will ping you offline (slack or email) and talk more about that. Best, Kai On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Kai Jiang <jiang...@gmail.com>

Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2018 is coming

Hi Beam Community, I am Kai Jiang, a master student majoring in CS from Portland State University, highly interested in big data and distributed System. I have contributed code to Apache Spark as a selected GSoC project in 2016. Besides, I've been contributing to Beam codebase. Some my Pull

Re: Help! Beam SQL needs more committer support

I am very interested in supporting SQL PRs to help you reduce your bandwidths. Best, Kai On Thu, Jun 28, 2018, 11:52 Austin Bennett wrote: > Same as Pablo - you can count me in, though am vastly less experience in > the Beam way, as him, etc. > > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Pablo

Jira Integration with Github

Hi all, Github has announced the official support for Jira integraton https://blog.github.com/2018-10-04-announcing-the-new-github-and-jira-software-cloud-integration/ . Is it possible to enable it for Apache Beam's Jira tickets? It could help with automation of issue workflows in Jira. Maybe,

Re: Jira Integration with Github

> This needs to be supported by the ASF first. So the best idea would be >>> to propose this to the INFRA team. Or post it on the ASF community >>> mailing list. >>> >>> Best, >>> Max >>> >>> On 09.10.18 06:37, Kai Jiang wrote: >>> >

Re: Move mock classes out of test directory in BeamSQL

Big +1. Best, Kai ᐧ On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 10:42 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 > > it makes sense. > > Regards > JB > > On 02/10/2018 01:32, Rui Wang wrote: > > Hi Community, > > > > BeamSQL defines some mock classes (see mock > > < >

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New Beam chair: Kenneth Knowles

Congrats, Kenn! ᐧ On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 1:23 PM Alan Myrvold wrote: > Congrats, Kenn. > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 1:08 PM Maximilian Michels wrote: > >> Congrats! >> >> On 19.09.18 22:07, Robin Qiu wrote: >> > Congratulations, Kenn! >> > >> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 1:05 PM Lukasz Cwik > >

Re: Donating the Dataflow Worker code to Apache Beam

+1 (non googler) big help for transparency and for future runners. Best, Kai On Thu, Sep 13, 2018, 11:45 Xinyu Liu wrote: > Big +1 (non-googler). > > From Samza Runner's perspective, we are very happy to see dataflow worker > code so we can learn and compete :). > > Thanks, > Xinyu > > On

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer announcement: Gleb Kanterov

Congratulations! On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:01 AM Rui Wang wrote: > Congratulations! > > -Rui > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 9:58 AM Ruoyun Huang wrote: > >> Congratulations Gleb! >> >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 9:18 AM Scott Wegner wrote: >> >>> Congrats, and welcome Gleb! >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 25,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Mikhail Gryzykhin

Congrats! On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 1:46 PM Chamikara Jayalath wrote: > Congrats!! > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:12 AM Mikhail Gryzykhin > wrote: > >> Thank you everyone. >> >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 2:28 AM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy < >> aizha...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Congrats Misha! >>> >>>

Re: [VOTE] Vendored Dependencies Release

pull/8357 proposes to vendor bytebuddy artifact. Is it possible to release "beam-vendor-bytebuddy-1_9_3" in next release candidate? Best, Kai On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:31 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > grpc: jar contains certs, keys, protos at the top

Re: [VOTE] Vendored Dependencies Release

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 8:27 PM Lukasz Cwik wrote: > Please review the release of the following artifacts that we vendor: > * beam-vendor-grpc_1_21_0 > * beam-vendor-guava-26_0-jre > * beam-vendor-bytebuddy-1_9_3 > > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release

[Discuss] Propose Calcite Vendor Release

Hi Community, As a part of effort to unblock for vendor calcite in SQL module, we broke it into pull/9333 for going through vendored dependencies release process separately. I want to propose Calcite vendor release and look for a release manager to help

Re: [Discuss] Propose Calcite Vendor Release

> > > [1]: https://s.apache.org/beam-release-vendored-artifacts > > -Rui > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 5:00 PM Kai Jiang wrote: > >> Hi Community, >> >> As a part of effort to unblock for vendor calcite in SQL module, we broke >> it into pull/9333 <ht

Re: [VOTE] Vendored Dependencies Release

+1 (non-binding)Thanks Rui! On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:46 PM Rui Wang wrote: > Please review the release of the following artifacts that we vendor: > > * beam-vendor-calcite-1_20_0 > > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the >

Re: [VOTE] Vendored Dependencies Release

Hi Rui, For accessing artifacts [1] in Maven Central Repository, is this intent to be not public exposed? Best, Kai [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1083/ On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:57 AM Kai Jiang wrote: > +1 (non-binding)Thanks Rui! > > On

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rui Wang

Congrats!  On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 09:47 Anton Kedin wrote: > Congrats! > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 9:36 AM Ankur Goenka wrote: > >> Congratulations Rui! >> Well deserved  >> >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 9:35 AM Ahmet Altay wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Please join me and the rest of the Beam PMC in

Failed Nexmark non-Direct runner tests with vendored Calcite

Hi Community, When vendoring Calcite in Beam SQL (pull/9189 ), we only pass direct runner nexmark test, but, all non-Direct runners tests were not passed (Spark runner , Flink runner

Re: beam_PostCommit_Java_Nexmark_Flink are failing continuously

I checked the logs of failure jobs. It might be related to the issue when vendoring calcite. Investigating on this issue. Best, Kai On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:06 AM Boyuan Zhang wrote: > Hey team, > > beam_PostCommit_Java_Nexmark_Flink >

Re: [spark structured streaming runner] available on master

Cool, cool! Love to see Nexmark on Spark structured streaming runner perfkit dashboard On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 2:12 PM Pablo Estrada wrote: > Very cool! : ) Thanks to everyone involved moving this forward. > Best > -P. > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 8:50 AM Etienne Chauchot > wrote: > >> Forgot

Re: [Discuss] Propose Calcite Vendor Release (1.22.0)

Thanks, Rui! Big +1 for calcite vendor release (1.22.0) Curious, what's the progress of Calcite 1.22.0 official release? I saw Calcite community just passes the vote for 1.22.0 rc3. Best, Kai On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 9:24 PM Rui Wang wrote: > Hi Community, > > As Calcite is closing to finish

Re: [VOTE] Vendored Dependencies Release Byte Buddy 1.10.8 RC2

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 01:23 Ismaël Mejía wrote: > Please review the release of the following artifacts that we vendor: > * beam-vendor-bytebuddy-1_10_8 > > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 0.1, as > follows: > [ ] +1, Approve

Re: [VOTE] Vendored Dependencies Release gRPC 1.26.0 v0.2 for BEAM-9252

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 5:03 PM Robin Qiu wrote: > +1 (verified) > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:55 PM Robert Bradshaw > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:48 PM Ahmet Altay wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:39 PM Luke Cwik wrote:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Vendored bytebuddy dependency release

+1 On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 09:50 Alex Van Boxel wrote: > +1 > > _/ > > _/ Alex Van Boxel > > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 5:45 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> Le sam. 22 f?vr. 2020 ? 15:02, Isma?l Mej?a a ?crit : >> >>> The version of bytebuddy Beam is

Re: beam_PostCommit_Java_Nexmark_Flink are failing continuously

git bisect on commits. this issue is fixed by https://github.com/apache/beam/commit/4af507f567605723af940c2af3b2912d0948adf5 On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 3:14 AM Maximilian Michels wrote: > Definitely not expected :) Thanks for investigating Kai. > > On 16.10.19 20:29, Kai Jiang wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Vendored Dependencies Release

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 8:48 PM jincheng sun wrote: > +1，checked list as follows： > - verified the hash and signature > - verified that there is no linkage errors > - verified that the content of the pom is expected: the shaded > dependencies are not exposed, the scope of the

Re: Jenkins job execution policy

Nice! I took a look at Beam Jenkins job properties ( CommonJobProperties.groovy#L108-L111 ) and it uses jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin

Re: Jenkins jobs not running for my PR 10438

same for https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9903 as well On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 1:40 PM Chamikara Jayalath wrote: > Seems like Jenkins tests are not being triggered for this PR as well: > https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10427 > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 2:16 PM Tomo Suzuki wrote: > >>

Re: Jenkins jobs not running for my PR 10438

>> Maybe the PR status is not being updated when the jobs run? >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 2:37 PM Kai Jiang wrote: >> >>> same for https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9903 as well >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 1:40 PM Chamikara Jayal

Re: Jenkins jobs not running for my PR 10438

pushing again. retest this please. nothing works :( >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 12:55 AM Michał Walenia < >>> michal.wale...@polidea.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> I'm also affected by this - I touched my PRs opened before the ho

Re: Jenkins jobs not running for my PR 10438

e was a >>>>> change in Jenkins job execution policy - non-committers can't run Jenkins >>>>> workflows now, as it would be a security flaw in terms of arbitrary code >>>>> execution. >>>>> Does anyone know about this? When exactly was thi

Re: GSoC 2020: Congratulations, your proposal with The Apache Software Foundation has been accepted!

Congratulations! On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 8:07 PM John Mora wrote: > Hi all. > > My proposal for GSoC was accepted, so this summer I will be working with > you guys in the aggregation analytics functionality of Beam. Thanks so much > for your support during the application period, specially to my

Re: [VOTE] Vendored Dependencies Release Byte Buddy 1.11.0

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:23 PM Jan Lukavský wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > verified correct shading. > > Jan > On 5/19/21 8:53 PM, Ismaël Mejía wrote: > > This release is only to publish the vendored dependency artifacts. We need > those to integrate it and be able to verify

Re: [VOTE] Release vendor-calcite-1_26_0 version 0.1, release candidate #1

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 11:37 AM Andrew Pilloud wrote: > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for > beam-vendor-calcite-1_26_0 version 0.1, as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific