Re: Missing BookKeeper tags on dockerhub

I have compared our git tags for 4.9.1 and 4.9.2 and 4.10.0 it seems that we missed these special "tags": https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.9.2-docker https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.10.0-docker It seems that we changed something in 4.8.2 with this commit fr

R: Website update after 4.10, Time Based Release plan and EOL

Do we need a vote for both proposal? Regarding the EOL Policy: do we want to wait and see if the new release window works before declaring an official policy? Regards, Alessandro > -Messaggio originale- > Da: Sijie Guo > Inviato: martedì 3 dicembre 2019 08:19 > A: Bookkeeper-Dev > Ogg

Re: Missing BookKeeper tags on dockerhub

It is all done now https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/bookkeeper/tags We should update the release guide Enrico Il giorno mar 3 dic 2019 alle ore 09:03 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > I have compared our git tags for 4.9.1 and 4.9.2 and 4.10.0 > > it seems that we missed these special "tags": > > h

Re: Website update after 4.10, Time Based Release plan and EOL

Yes we need votes for both proposals. We can wait to see if the new release window work before declaring an official policy. It might be worthing waiting for a few more days before starting a vote. So other people can chime in if they have different ideas. Thanks, Sijie On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1

Re: Missing BookKeeper tags on dockerhub

Cool. Thank you Enrico! - Sijie On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:06 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > It is all done now > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/bookkeeper/tags > > We should update the release guide > > Enrico > > Il giorno mar 3 dic 2019 alle ore 09:03 Enrico Olivelli < > eolive...@gmail.com> ha

Audit Logging for BookieShell

Hi Everyone!, I have written up a proposal for audit logging in BookieShell. The proposal is simple but has a large impact on compliance certifications. I'll start an official BP based on reception o

Re: Audit Logging for BookieShell

Good Can you please take into account the 'new shell' we released with latest versions 4.9 and 4.10? The name is 'bkctl', we are bundling it with the binary distribution and as a separate standalone package The work would be the same. We should deprecate BookieShell, if you look at the code you w

Re: Audit Logging for BookieShell

Hmm yes, good point! Will keep that in mind and make the appropriate changes for bkctl as well. > Unfortunately there is no doc :) Sounds like a good opportunity to put together something! Regards, Anup On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:10 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Good > > Can you please take into