Re: [PR] use AppendHeader for http2 (brpc)

2023-10-06 Thread via GitHub


Huixxi merged PR #2387:
URL: https://github.com/apache/brpc/pull/2387


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@brpc.apache.org



Re: [PR] use AppendHeader for http2 (brpc)

2023-09-27 Thread via GitHub


zyearn commented on code in PR #2387:
URL: https://github.com/apache/brpc/pull/2387#discussion_r1339124802


##
test/brpc_http_rpc_protocol_unittest.cpp:
##
@@ -1544,7 +1544,7 @@ TEST_F(HttpTest, http2_header_after_data) {
 ASSERT_EQ(res_header.content_type(), "application/proto");
 // Check overlapped header is overwritten by the latter.
 const std::string* user_defined1 = res_header.GetHeader("user-defined1");
-ASSERT_EQ(*user_defined1, "overwrite-a");
+ASSERT_EQ(*user_defined1, "a,overwrite-a");

Review Comment:
   RFC doesn't mention overwritten. It says: Multiple message-header fields 
with the same field-name MAY be present in a message if and only if the entire 
field-value for that header field is defined as a comma-separated list [i.e., 
#(values)].
   
   In brpc implementation, if the incoming header is in the format of 
"key:value1,value2,value3", brpc won't overwrite cases like this. But combining 
headers seems reasonable otherwise the previous header would be lost.



##
test/brpc_http_rpc_protocol_unittest.cpp:
##
@@ -1544,7 +1544,7 @@ TEST_F(HttpTest, http2_header_after_data) {
 ASSERT_EQ(res_header.content_type(), "application/proto");
 // Check overlapped header is overwritten by the latter.
 const std::string* user_defined1 = res_header.GetHeader("user-defined1");
-ASSERT_EQ(*user_defined1, "overwrite-a");
+ASSERT_EQ(*user_defined1, "a,overwrite-a");

Review Comment:
   LGTM



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@brpc.apache.org



Re: [PR] use AppendHeader for http2 (brpc)

2023-09-21 Thread via GitHub


wwbmmm commented on code in PR #2387:
URL: https://github.com/apache/brpc/pull/2387#discussion_r1333832158


##
test/brpc_http_rpc_protocol_unittest.cpp:
##
@@ -1544,7 +1544,7 @@ TEST_F(HttpTest, http2_header_after_data) {
 ASSERT_EQ(res_header.content_type(), "application/proto");
 // Check overlapped header is overwritten by the latter.
 const std::string* user_defined1 = res_header.GetHeader("user-defined1");
-ASSERT_EQ(*user_defined1, "overwrite-a");
+ASSERT_EQ(*user_defined1, "a,overwrite-a");

Review Comment:
   Do you know why it was designed to overwrite before? @zyearn 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@brpc.apache.org



Re: [PR] use AppendHeader for http2 (brpc)

2023-09-19 Thread via GitHub


lhsoft commented on code in PR #2387:
URL: https://github.com/apache/brpc/pull/2387#discussion_r1330925273


##
test/brpc_http_rpc_protocol_unittest.cpp:
##
@@ -1544,7 +1544,7 @@ TEST_F(HttpTest, http2_header_after_data) {
 ASSERT_EQ(res_header.content_type(), "application/proto");
 // Check overlapped header is overwritten by the latter.
 const std::string* user_defined1 = res_header.GetHeader("user-defined1");
-ASSERT_EQ(*user_defined1, "overwrite-a");
+ASSERT_EQ(*user_defined1, "a,overwrite-a");

Review Comment:
   The test case is `http2_header_after_data`.  
   For http2,  according to the 
[rfc](https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec4.html#sec4.2) , it 
shouldn't be expected to be overwritten.
   The 
[grpc](https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/blob/master/Documentation/grpc-metadata.md)
 use map[string][]string for header:
   ```
   md := metadata.Pairs(
   "key1", "val1",
   "key1", "val1-2", // "key1" will have map value []string{"val1", 
"val1-2"}
   "key2", "val2",
   )
   ```



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@brpc.apache.org



Re: [PR] use AppendHeader for http2 (brpc)

2023-09-19 Thread via GitHub


lhsoft commented on code in PR #2387:
URL: https://github.com/apache/brpc/pull/2387#discussion_r1330925273


##
test/brpc_http_rpc_protocol_unittest.cpp:
##
@@ -1544,7 +1544,7 @@ TEST_F(HttpTest, http2_header_after_data) {
 ASSERT_EQ(res_header.content_type(), "application/proto");
 // Check overlapped header is overwritten by the latter.
 const std::string* user_defined1 = res_header.GetHeader("user-defined1");
-ASSERT_EQ(*user_defined1, "overwrite-a");
+ASSERT_EQ(*user_defined1, "a,overwrite-a");

Review Comment:
   The test case is `http2_header_after_data`.  
   For http2,  according to the rfc : [ 
https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec4.html#sec4.2](url), it 
shouldn't be expected to be overwritten.
   The 
[grpc](https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/blob/master/Documentation/grpc-metadata.md)
 use map[string][]string for header:
   ```
   md := metadata.Pairs(
   "key1", "val1",
   "key1", "val1-2", // "key1" will have map value []string{"val1", 
"val1-2"}
   "key2", "val2",
   )
   ```



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@brpc.apache.org



Re: [PR] use AppendHeader for http2 (brpc)

2023-09-19 Thread via GitHub


lhsoft commented on code in PR #2387:
URL: https://github.com/apache/brpc/pull/2387#discussion_r1330925273


##
test/brpc_http_rpc_protocol_unittest.cpp:
##
@@ -1544,7 +1544,7 @@ TEST_F(HttpTest, http2_header_after_data) {
 ASSERT_EQ(res_header.content_type(), "application/proto");
 // Check overlapped header is overwritten by the latter.
 const std::string* user_defined1 = res_header.GetHeader("user-defined1");
-ASSERT_EQ(*user_defined1, "overwrite-a");
+ASSERT_EQ(*user_defined1, "a,overwrite-a");

Review Comment:
   The test case is `http2_header_after_data`.  
   For http2,  according to the rfc : [ 
https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec4.html#sec4.2](url), it 
shouldn't be expected to be overwritten



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@brpc.apache.org



Re: [PR] use AppendHeader for http2 (brpc)

2023-09-19 Thread via GitHub


wwbmmm commented on code in PR #2387:
URL: https://github.com/apache/brpc/pull/2387#discussion_r1330049003


##
test/brpc_http_rpc_protocol_unittest.cpp:
##
@@ -1544,7 +1544,7 @@ TEST_F(HttpTest, http2_header_after_data) {
 ASSERT_EQ(res_header.content_type(), "application/proto");
 // Check overlapped header is overwritten by the latter.
 const std::string* user_defined1 = res_header.GetHeader("user-defined1");
-ASSERT_EQ(*user_defined1, "overwrite-a");
+ASSERT_EQ(*user_defined1, "a,overwrite-a");

Review Comment:
   The original test case was written as "overwrite-a", was it expected to be 
overwritten? Changing the behavior here may not conform to the previous design.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@brpc.apache.org