Re: Deprecating/removing PropertyFileSnitch?

2018-10-29 Thread Jeremy Hanna
Re-reading this thread, it sounds like the issue is there are times when a field may go missing in gossip and it hasn’t yet been tracked down. As Jeremiah says, can we get that into a Jira issue with any contextual information (if there is any)? However as he says, in theory fields going miss

Re: Deprecating/removing PropertyFileSnitch?

2018-10-29 Thread Jeff Jirsa
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 8:35 AM Jeremy Hanna wrote: > Re-reading this thread, it sounds like the issue is there are times when a > field may go missing in gossip and it hasn’t yet been tracked down. As > Jeremiah says, can we get that into a Jira issue with any contextual > information (if there

Re: Deprecating/removing PropertyFileSnitch?

2018-10-29 Thread J. D. Jordan
The place people get in trouble with PFS is that the example file has a “default” setting in it, which people fill out because it is there. Later down the road they typo/mess up updating the file when they add nodes in a different DC than the default, and oops, stuff is messed up. That and GPFS

Re: Deprecating/removing PropertyFileSnitch?

2018-10-29 Thread Jeremy Hanna
> On Oct 29, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 8:35 AM Jeremy Hanna > wrote: > >> Re-reading this thread, it sounds like the issue is there are times when a >> field may go missing in gossip and it hasn’t yet been tracked down. As >> Jeremiah says, can we get t

Re: Deprecating/removing PropertyFileSnitch?

2018-10-29 Thread Alexander Dejanovski
Hi, I fully agree that PFS is way too dangerous and makes little (if any) sense compared to GPFS. We've had numerous customers that ended up with potential data loss and fairly complex procedures to recover from several nodes jumping into the default DC. Misconfigurations also led to sudden change

Re: CASSANDRA-13241 lower default chunk_length_in_kb

2018-10-29 Thread Ariel Weisberg
Hi, Seeing too many -'s for changing the representation and essentially no +1s so I submitted a patch for just changing the default. I could use a reviewer for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13241 I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14857 "Use a more spa

Re: CASSANDRA-13241 lower default chunk_length_in_kb

2018-10-29 Thread Jonathan Haddad
Looks straightforward, I can review today. On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 12:25 PM Ariel Weisberg wrote: > Hi, > > Seeing too many -'s for changing the representation and essentially no +1s > so I submitted a patch for just changing the default. I could use a > reviewer for https://issues.apache.org/ji