Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying the CEP process

2021-07-13 Thread Ekaterina Dimitrova
Resending to the right thread: Hi everyone, Reading the thread I feel we are all more or less on the same page. My personal line of thinking: 1) I really like Benedict’s idea of some kind of cheat sheet 2) I think some kind of PoC PR/high-level prototype when/if needed, sounds reasonable.

Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying the CEP process

2021-07-08 Thread Maulin Vasavada
Based on my experience I definitely like the process where everything that needs to be discussed about CEP remains in DISCUSS thread. Also I like the comment made above " The jira ticket and PR can be created as a PoC to help explain and illustrate the CEP, but nothing more than that.". Sometimes

Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying the CEP process

2021-07-08 Thread Scott Hirleman
Or maybe someone _can_ comment on the JIRA but should also for sure put that same comment in the discussion thread? That way, it is at worst redundant and doesn't get lost as a comment on a JIRA many may not see? On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 3:32 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > I think that’s a bit

Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying the CEP process

2021-07-08 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> I think that’s a bit extreme – … Yeah, that was kinda my intention. But my thinking was just about getting us out of our habits of using JIRA. Of course I didn't mean any censure. Once we have some precedence in place, common-sense should prevail. Perhaps we should put together a cheat

Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying the CEP process

2021-07-08 Thread bened...@apache.org
for further discussion. From: Mick Semb Wever Date: Thursday, 8 July 2021 at 11:14 To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying the CEP process My understanding is that they should have been raised on the DISCUSSION > thread. Once those concerns are addressed or discussed, I beli

Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying the CEP process

2021-07-08 Thread Mick Semb Wever
My understanding is that they should have been raised on the DISCUSSION > thread. Once those concerns are addressed or discussed, I believe that if > nobody raised more concerns we should trigger a VOTE. > > Is my understanding correct? > Agree, we shouldn't be commenting on jira tickets or on

Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying the CEP process

2021-07-08 Thread bened...@apache.org
That’s how I understand the process, yes. Voting to accept the CEP just indicates that the broad strokes painted by the CEP are acceptable to the community, and a patch can be brought forward with the expectation that it will be accepted once it meets the other criteria for acceptance. From: