Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Cassandra 3.8

Also I believe Pavel may have switched tacitly to -1 with his "I agree with Sylvain" email? On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Brandon Williams wrote: > I change my vote to -1. > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 28,

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Cassandra 3.8

I change my vote to -1. On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko > wrote: > > > 1. Release 3.8 as is now. It’s an even preview release that can live fine > > with one minor annoyance on

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Cassandra 3.8

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote: > 1. Release 3.8 as is now. It’s an even preview release that can live fine > with one minor annoyance on upgrade. Have 3.9 released on schedule. > Since the vote technically passed, we can just do it, now. > > 2. Wait

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Cassandra 3.8

-1 On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote: > Let me sum up my thoughts so far. > > Some of the most important goals of tick-tock were 1) predictable, regular > releases with manageable changesets and > 2)individual releases that are more stable than in our

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Cassandra 3.8

Let me sum up my thoughts so far. Some of the most important goals of tick-tock were 1) predictable, regular releases with manageable changesets and  2)individual releases that are more stable than in our previous process. Now, we’ve already slipped a few times. Most recently with 3.6, and now

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Cassandra 3.8

I apologize for messing this vote up. So, what should happen now? Drop RESULT from the subject and continue discussion of alternatives and voting? -- Kind regards, Michael On 07/27/2016 06:33 AM, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote: > The difference is that those -1s were based on new information >

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Cassandra 3.8

You can count me as -1. On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote: > Sorry, but I’m counting 3 binding +1s and 1 binding -1 (2, if you > interpret Jonathan’s emails as such). > > Thus, if you were to do close the vote now, the vote is passing with the >

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Cassandra 3.8

The difference is that those -1s were based on new information discovered after the vote was started, while this one wasn’t. In addition to that, the discussion was still ongoing, and a decision on the alternative has not been made. As such closing the vote was definitely premature.  FWIW I

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Cassandra 3.8

I concur with Sylvain. On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Aleksey Yeschenko > wrote: > > > Sorry, but I’m counting 3 binding +1s and 1 binding -1 (2, if you > > interpret Jonathan’s emails as

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Cassandra 3.8

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote: > Sorry, but I’m counting 3 binding +1s and 1 binding -1 (2, if you > interpret Jonathan’s emails as such). > > Thus, if you were to do close the vote now, the vote is passing with the > binding majority, and the

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Cassandra 3.8

For completeness, Jake and Pavel are the other two. On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote: > Sorry (: Only see yours, Dave’s, and mine in my client. Apparently I’ve > trashed the email chain at some point. > > -- > AY > > On 26 July 2016 at 23:48:49,

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Cassandra 3.8

Sorry (: Only see yours, Dave’s, and mine in my client. Apparently I’ve trashed the email chain at some point. --  AY On 26 July 2016 at 23:48:49, Brandon Williams (dri...@gmail.com) wrote: Small nit: there are currently 5 binding +1 and 1 binding -1, (or 2, with Jonathan.) On Tue, Jul

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Cassandra 3.8

Small nit: there are currently 5 binding +1 and 1 binding -1, (or 2, with Jonathan.) On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote: > Sorry, but I’m counting 3 binding +1s and 1 binding -1 (2, if you > interpret Jonathan’s emails as such). > > Thus, if you were to

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Cassandra 3.8

Sorry, but I’m counting 3 binding +1s and 1 binding -1 (2, if you interpret Jonathan’s emails as such). Thus, if you were to do close the vote now, the vote is passing with the binding majority, and the required minimum # of +1s gained. I also don’t see the PMC consensus on ‘August 3.8 release