I like Jon's idea, plenty of food for thought in terms of a 4.0
retrospective + what's on the future.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:18 PM sankalp kohli wrote:
> Another thing to discuss will be how to improve testing further from the
> learning of finding bugs in C* 4.0.
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at
Another thing to discuss will be how to improve testing further from the
learning of finding bugs in C* 4.0.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:57 AM Jason Brown wrote:
> +1 to Jon's sentiment. Further, perhaps we should use that time after
> GA'ing 4.0 to poll our users what they need/want from the
+1 to Jon's sentiment. Further, perhaps we should use that time after
GA'ing 4.0 to poll our users what they need/want from the next major
release of the database.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Jonathan Haddad wrote:
> I'm thinking a month or two after 4.0 would give us time to unwind after
>
I'm thinking a month or two after 4.0 would give us time to unwind after
the release and start to give real thought to big changes coming in the
next release. Let's focus on one thing at a time.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:29 PM sankalp kohli
wrote:
> A good time for NGCC will be closer to 4.0
Are we going to have a dev event next month? Or anything this year? We may
also be able to provide space in bay area and help to organize it. (Please
let us know, so we could get final approval for that).
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:05 AM Jonathan Haddad wrote:
> My interpretation of Nate's
My interpretation of Nate's statement was that since there would be a bunch
of us at Lynn's event, we might as well do NGCC at the same time.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:03 PM Ben Bromhead wrote:
> It sounds like there may be an appetite for something, but the NGCC in its
> current format is
We are interested in bay area C* developers event as well.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:42 PM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> Bay area event is interesting to me, in any format.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:03 PM, Ben Bromhead wrote:
>
> > It sounds like there may be an appetite for something, but the
Bay area event is interesting to me, in any format.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:03 PM, Ben Bromhead wrote:
> It sounds like there may be an appetite for something, but the NGCC in its
> current format is likely to not be that useful?
>
> Is a bay area event focused on C* developers something
It sounds like there may be an appetite for something, but the NGCC in its
current format is likely to not be that useful?
Is a bay area event focused on C* developers something that is interesting
for the broader dev community? In whatever format that may be?
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 5:02 PM
This was discussed amongst the PMC recently. We did not come to a
conclusion and there were not terribly strong feelings either way.
I don't feel like we need to hustle to get "NGCC" in place,
particularly given our decided focus on 4.0. However, that should not
stop us from doing an additional
That was a factor in our thinking and my suggested timing/city, but as you
know such an event is more than just space in a conference room :)
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 1:03 PM Patrick McFadin wrote:
> Ben,
>
> Lynn Bender had offered a space the day before Distributed Data Summit in
> September
Ben,
Lynn Bender had offered a space the day before Distributed Data Summit in
September (http://distributeddatasummit.com/) since we are both platinum
sponsors. I thought he and Nate had talked about that being a good place
for NGCC since many of us will be in town already.
Nate, now that I've
I am an organizer with a conference (GR8Conf US) here in Minneapolis I
would be happy to assist with organizing and we also have recording
equipment to support up to 3 tracks. We operate under a non profit already
if we need a legal entity.
If it is the bay area I we can't help much with space
13 matches
Mail list logo
