On 07/11/2016 10:52, Benedict Elliott Smith wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks, that was a calm and diplomatic email.
>
> recognise where they might need to apologise
>
>
> I will start the ball rolling here, as I have not always been generous in
> my interpretations of others' actions, and have cert
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> A number of posts from a variety of authors on this topic in recent days
> have fallen short of the standard expected on an Apache list. Trying to
> correct that without causing the situation to escalate is hard. The last
> thing I want to do is
Hi Mark,
Thanks, that was a calm and diplomatic email.
recognise where they might need to apologise
I will start the ball rolling here, as I have not always been generous in
my interpretations of others' actions, and have certainly contributed to
escalation.
But I wonder if you would also help
For the sake of clarity I am a member of the ASF board but I am not
speaking on behalf of the board in this email.
On 06/11/2016 01:25, Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> I hope the other 7 members of the board take note of this response,
> and other similar reactions on dev@ today.
I can't speak for all seven
Benedict, you ride the 'bla said blub', bääh.. since at least 5 replies.
Yes the discussion was heated on both sides. But Chris didn't say anything
since many posts. And his reply was sharp but really not totally personal. Can
we now come back to a more technical discussion again please?
Some
You've cherry picked, as usual.
"In what possible universe dropping that hammer threat from the ’20% off”
email thread,
then following up with a Game of Thrones youtube clip is alright?"
"In an ideal world, that power would entail corresponding duties:
care and consideration in your actions at le
"well written, cogent and on-topic" ... "reasoned rebuttal"
You keep on using those words. I don't think they mean
what you think they do. Some data points:
o " A lot of extra power, like it or not (I have a feeling you quite like it,
though)."
o "you are being hotheaded, impulsive, antagoni
Jim,
I would love it if you could take the time to explain how arrived at a
diagnosis of trolling.
Aleksey made a well written, cogent and on-topic criticism of your ongoing
behaviour, as well as a reasoned rebuttal of your absurd claim that your
power is inherent to *you*, not your position (I d
Sorry that people took the reply as pompous... You are certainly
within your rights to take it anyway you want. It was not
meant that way.
In the same vein, I am within my rights to take responses
in the way I want, which I took as simple trolling. And
with trolls, as with thermonuclear war, the o
Thanks Jeff for your thoughtful comments. +100
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 5, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote:
>
> I hope the other 7 members of the board take note of this response,
> and other similar reactions on dev@ today.
>
> When Datastax violated trademark, they acknowledged it and
I hope the other 7 members of the board take note of this response,
and other similar reactions on dev@ today.
When Datastax violated trademark, they acknowledged it and worked to
correct it. To their credit, they tried to do the right thing.
When the PMC failed to enforce problems, we acknowledge
I take this response (a second time) as a pompous way to trivialize the
responses of others as to the point of their points being meaningless to
you. So either explain what this means, or accept the fact that you are
as Chris is exactly what people are claiming you to be. Abnoxious
bullies more
12 matches
Mail list logo