Alex,
Exactly.
We can also use Enable Maintenance - umount nfs point - restart
cloudstack-agent - Cancel Maintenance to solve this issue.
-Wei
2013/8/2 Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com
So I have very limited knowledge on KVM. But, from my understanding from
Edison, we should consider what
I just have 2 comments,
1. Since this feature allows the admin to assign (and release) the IP addresses
and VLANs only to an account, not both domain and account we need to modify the
introduction accordingly.
2. And could you also add the following to section 15.8,
If an account has
This of course introduces an extra DB call during EVERY agent
communication.
If there was a cache, not a big deal, but as it so happens, there isn't
one.
On 8/1/13 10:10 PM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
I see your point Marcus.
I felt that accessing the database would be simpler
This was working yesterday but the launching of instances for me on 4.2
is currently not working. I have twice now tried a clean build along
with deploydb and deploysvr in the usual manner but no luck.
On the UI I get:
Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|tom1]
On the management server
Hi,
I started running MS , host is xen hypervisor. After 2 system vms are up, there
were issues. So I made changes in source code, rebuild, did deploydb to clean
DB.
Now I am running ms again, but failed to bring up ssvm and cpvm, because of the
existing old system vm from previous run.
I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/
---
Review request for cloudstack, edison su and Wido den Hollander.
Bugs:
On devcloud
$ cd /
$ find . -name vmdata.py
Do you see a file by that name anywhere in the XCP plugins? If not -
it failed to copy over into the devcloud plugins for some reason when
adding the host.
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 03:22:20PM +0900, Thomas O'Dowd wrote:
This was working yesterday but
Edison,
Please review the patch: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/
-Wei
2013/8/2 Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com
Alex,
Exactly.
We can also use Enable Maintenance - umount nfs point - restart
cloudstack-agent - Cancel Maintenance to solve this issue.
-Wei
2013/8/2 Alex Huang
On your xen host
$ xe vm-uninstall --force --multiple
And reconnect the MS again, it should kick in HA for systemVMs and
restart them.
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 06:36:09AM +, Fang Wang wrote:
Hi,
I started running MS , host is xen hypervisor. After 2 system vms are up,
there were issues.
Hi Prasanna,
I've just finished re-initializing a brand new devcloud and am about to
start things up again.
root@devcloud:~# find / -name vmdata.py
root@devcloud:~#
Maybe it was there before in my previous install. How would it be copied
to devcloud usually? For example for the s3xen plugin I
Hi,
Multiple IP Address per NIC documentation is ready for review. The doc is
attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-809.
Please see 15.9. Configuring Multiple IP Addresses on a Single NIC (134), and
provide your feedback.
Regards
-Radhika
Yeah this was a recent change that Marcus made to optimize the vmdata
passed to guests. I'll verify why the change is not working shortly.
Running some other tests at the moment on my setup.
Meanwhile, Could you manually copy that to where you see the s3xen
plugin and retry?
On Fri, Aug 02,
Ok. I've just copied it over. Its the only one that ends with .py and
I've chmod'd it to 755 also.
Will check it shortly. I'm building.
Tom.
root@devcloud:~# ls -l /usr/lib/xcp/plugins/
total 164
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8304 Nov 5 2012 coalesce-leaf
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 301 Nov 27 2012
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24511
---
Review 13223 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build
Hi guys,
So how to fix this? I got the same error
Thanks,
2013/4/1 Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com
I had debugged and found that from devcloud unable to ssh to the router
vm. When it tries to execute the GetDomRVersionCmd its getting failing and
router vm is getting destroyed.
I
Prasanna,
when I first ran deploysvr after a new database install, I had quite a
lot of starting and crashing of the system vms (which seems new to me)
but I waited and it settled down.
I was then able to launch an instance again after the usual other steps.
The instance now tells me the
I made a mistake - the vmdata goes into the router deployed by
cloudstack but is called by the router_proxy.sh script within the
/usr/lib/xcp directory of the host over ssh.
root@r-5-VM:/# find . -name vmdata.py
./opt/cloud/bin/vmdata.py
The tests are passing now and VM deploy works fine:
Thanks Prasanna,
I've confirmed that the vmdata.py is on the router vm.
root@r-7-VM:~# find / -name vmdata.py
/opt/cloud/bin/vmdata.py
Maybe some other commit fixed the problem at the same time for me.
Tom.
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 14:42 +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
I made a mistake - the
Sanjeev,
Any further ideas on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3229
John worked and I worked on it quite a lot yesterday (he had a long day
or rather a short night). We're passed the S3 plugin issue but snapshots
are still failing on what looks like the last step.
Tom.
On Tue,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13109/#review24513
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Prasanna Santhanam
On July 31, 2013, 12:13
Can https://reviews.apache.org/r/13192/ be reviewed please.
regards,
Daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13236/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Repository:
Mike,
That is correct, we need to enforce data disk selection when user goes through
deploying instance wizard in UI.
Is there a config to do this or should I hack some .js files?
Thanks
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Friday,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12360/#review24514
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Wei Zhou
On July 14, 2013, 3:38 a.m., Jijun
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13236/#review24515
---
The reason for failure of the login tests is that Marvin is not
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, edison su, and Ram Ganesh.
Bugs:
Now that we've bumped the version number, do we need to
create Upgrade420to430 and add it
to engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java ?
I ran mvn -P developer -pl developer,tools/devcloud -Ddeploydb (from [1])
on a fresh checkout of master and got:
[ERROR] Failed to
There is no any gc to enforce the datadisk selection; perhaps you can hack
instanceWizard.js file in ui-custom folder to disable the No thanks option.
--Sanjay
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 3:17 PM
To:
Hi,
This query is in relation to the permissions set for commands via
client/tomcatconf/commands.properties.in
Within the header of the file it states:
bitmap of permissions at the end of each classname, 1 = ADMIN, 2 =
RESOURCE_DOMAIN_ADMIN, 4 = DOMAIN_ADMIN, 8 = USER
However, throughout the
On 08/02/2013 01:55 AM, Edison Su wrote:
Hi Wei, regarding to the bug CLOUDSTACK-2729, I removed storage.refresh during
getStoragePool in LibvirtStorageAdaptor, but the issue still happened in BVT.
I am thinking add file lock on primary storage, seems you already have the
patch, could you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/#review24517
---
test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py
On 08/02/2013 11:22 AM, Dave Cahill wrote:
Now that we've bumped the version number, do we need to
create Upgrade420to430 and add it
to engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java ?
Yes, I forgot that. I created the SQL file, but I didn't create the Java
files.
Wido
Ian,
You can combine numbers to get the specific permission, for example
15 is the sum of 1, 2, 4, and 8 - which also means everyone has access
3 is the sum of 1 and 2 and only admin and resource admin have access
Regards
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Ian Duffy
Cool, thanks Ilya. I should of spotted that!
On 2 August 2013 11:32, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
Ian,
You can combine numbers to get the specific permission, for example
15 is the sum of 1, 2, 4, and 8 - which also means everyone has access
3 is the sum of 1 and 2 and only admin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13112/#review24518
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On Aug. 1, 2013, 6:01
Thanks a lot.
It work.
I'm unable to retrive PRIVATEKEY with API call:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.1/domain_admin/listSSHKeyPairs.html
the only way to retrieve is from:
Antonio,
For almost all clients, they do not want the provider storing the private
key (on management server). It is a big security risk for clients.
You have to store the key by yourself.
-Wei
2013/8/2 Antonio Petrocelli a.petroce...@netsons.com
Thanks a lot.
It work.
I'm unable to
This key must alreay be on the system...
Only i need to retrieve it API wan't i need a different solution
Thanks
Il 02/08/2013 12:51, Wei ZHOU ha scritto:
Antonio,
For almost all clients, they do not want the provider storing the
private key (on management server). It is a big
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13239/#review24519
---
Ship it!
- Prasanna Santhanam
On Aug. 2, 2013, 10:54 a.m.,
Hi,
While triaging bugs I noticed that many bugs had affectedVersion field as
empty. This makes it difficult to guess the version/release the reporter was
on while filing the bug. Can we make the affectedVersion field a mandatory
field instead?
Thanks,
RamG
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24520
---
I haven't tested the patch, but I'm missing some comments.
Can we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13239/#review24521
---
Review 13239 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13112/
---
(Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 11:16 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
Wido,
You applied the libvirt patch on your production system, and this issue
disappeared, right?
If so, that is good.
I expect the redhat community can accep the patch (or the v2
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-July/msg00639.html) ASAP.
-Wei
2013/8/2 Wido den Hollander
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13236/#review24522
---
Ship it!
The problem will be seen only when using marvin.sync to
+1
-Original Message-
From: Ram Ganesh [mailto:ram.gan...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 4:38 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory.
Hi,
While triaging bugs I noticed that many bugs had affectedVersion
On Aug. 2, 2013, 11:09 a.m., Wido den Hollander wrote:
I haven't tested the patch, but I'm missing some comments.
Can we add clear comments as to WHY this is in the code? Otherwise I'm
afraid this will become legacy and in 6 months new committer won't have the
slightest idea of why
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12360/#review24525
---
Review 12360 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build
On 08/02/2013 01:22 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Wido,
You applied the libvirt patch on your production system, and this issue
disappeared, right?
Yes, I applied that patch and rebuild libvirt. The issue never came back.
If so, that is good.
I expect the redhat community can accep the patch (or
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13238/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
Hi,
Egress Firewall Rules documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2685
Please see 15.22.2. Egress Firewall Rules in Advanced Zone(165), and provide
your feedback.
Regards
-Radhika
Hi,
IP Reservation documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850.
Please see 15.7. IP Reservation in Isolated Guest Networks, and provide your
feedback.
Regards
-Radhika
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13238/#review24526
---
Review 13238 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build
Hi,
PVLAN documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850.
Please see 15.14. Isolation in Advanced Zone Using Private VLAN (141), and
provide your feedback.
Regards
-Radhika
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/
---
(Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 1:03 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, edison su and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13240/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13127/
---
(Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 1:36 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Brian
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13128/
---
(Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 1:37 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Brian
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13241/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek.
Bugs: Cloudstack-1695
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13132/
---
(Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 1:37 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Brian
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13131/
---
(Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 1:38 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Brian
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13241/#review24528
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On Aug. 2, 2013, 1:36
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13240/#review24529
---
Review 13240 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build
Yes. I like the idea but we should just load the hostname during the attache's
creation rather than on every communication.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal
Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 11:20 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Marcus Sorensen
Cc: cloudstack; Alex
Yes, I thought of that, which is one of the reasons I asked for feedback.
I'm not quite sure how to do it the was Alex suggests, but I'll look into
it. I'm guessing some sort of id to hostname map that populates as attaches
are created.
On Aug 2, 2013 12:19 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13241/#review24530
---
Review 13241 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build
No it doesn't. Keeping both destroys the benefit of public key
cryptography. The idea is that you can hand out the public key and never
need share the private.
On Aug 2, 2013 7:02 AM, Antonio Petrocelli a.petroce...@netsons.com
wrote:
This key must alreay be on the system...
Only i need to
Hi all,
While forcefully deleting a domain through test case, it fails. The
resources in the domain and the domain itself gets cleaned up, but the code
fails with following error.
After cleaning up the resources, it says can't find the specific domain.
Has anybody seen this issue before?
Log:
+1
Thanks,
--
Toshiaki
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 05:25
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory.
+1
-Original Message-
From: Ram Ganesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13190/#review24538
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Brian Federle
On Aug. 1, 2013, 11:05 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13190/#review24541
---
Commit 977b0eca973b721fe158768f3f3c5515b9d2aab7 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13190/#review24540
---
Commit 80ae4830ae63ab73a06ab033bc3feb3dd701cbb2 in branch
Ok...i spoke too soon. Just talked with Prasanna. He pointed out that it's a
large change that's been in since May. So I won't revert it. But the rule is
no one can change create-schema.sql until the community decided we want to
based off of a new copy of the create-schema.
--Alex
Exactly...through the current CS GUI, this is hard coded to be optional -
although it probably wouldn't be hard to make required if you change
instanceWizard.js.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Sanjay Tripathi
sanjay.tripa...@citrix.comwrote:
There is no any gc to enforce the datadisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13192/#review24547
---
server/test/com/cloud/network/CreatePrivateNetworkTest.java
On 4.1?
On 8/2/13 1:05 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu ng.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
So how to fix this? I got the same error
Thanks,
2013/4/1 Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com
I had debugged and found that from devcloud unable to ssh to the router
vm. When it tries to execute the
On Aug. 2, 2013, 11:29 a.m., Jenkins Cloudstack.org wrote:
Review 13237 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build cloudstack-master-with-patch #106 is :
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/cloudstack-master-with-patch/106/
patch is not generated on master branch hence this failure
+1
On 8/2/13 4:06 AM, Ram Ganesh ram.gan...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
While triaging bugs I noticed that many bugs had affectedVersion field as
empty. This makes it difficult to guess the version/release the reporter
was on while filing the bug. Can we make the affectedVersion field a
mandatory
+10 How can we reproduce and verify without an affected version.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 10:56 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field
I am happy to announce the CloudStack Bay area meetup is on August 7th. Here is
the link for meetup details
http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-SF-Bay-Area-Users-Group/events/117379992/. If
you wish to be the speaker for this meetup please reach out to Karen Vuong,
John Kinsella or Animesh.
I'm brain-storming hosting a CloudStack workshop in NYC.
I'm under impression that meetups are too informational - and not enough hands
on.
End user must bring a laptop with Virtual Box pre-installed and template
downloaded prior to attending the workshop. I will also have few USB sticks
with
On Aug. 2, 2013, 5:26 p.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
server/test/com/cloud/network/CreatePrivateNetworkTest.java, line 163
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13192/diff/1/?file=332329#file332329line163
Use logger.error instead of printStackTrace? This way the logfile will
contain the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13192/
---
(Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 8:23 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Koushik Das
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13192/
---
(Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 8:24 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12976/#review24559
---
The fix is good, but the patch failed to apply:
alena@macbookpro:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13192/#review24571
---
Ship it!
Needs license headers. Fixed locally and committed.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13240/#review24576
---
server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Donal Lafferty
donal.laffe...@citrix.comwrote:
I needed a different configuration than DevCloud provided, so I turned to
CloudMonkey to automate setup of my test environment.
This led to a blog on automating with CloudMonkey at
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12976/
---
(Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 10:43 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alena
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24589
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12976/#review24590
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alena Prokharchyk
On Aug. 2, 2013, 10:43
Happens because the management server version was changed to 4.1.2 on the 4.1
branch, but the db upgrade path to 4.1.2 is not present in the databaseupgrade
checker. Adding 411-412 db upgrade path – empty if there were no db changes
between the releases- should fix this problem.
-alena.
From:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13008/#review24602
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kelven Yang
On Aug. 2, 2013, 12:49 a.m.,
As an example, you might want to look at the Wizard path related to kicking
off a VM that is based on an ISO (as opposed to a template).
In that path, the Disk Offering is required.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Exactly...through the
94 matches
Mail list logo
