Re: ovf file parser

Hi Will, We have hit some road blocks. The main issue here is that cloudstack sees the VM as a set of disks, while a OVA contains VM definition including instructions on pre boot steps, delays and maybe more. So even if we are able to reliably get disks from the OVA and orchestrate these

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

I agree to your concerns Wido. I did check the PR before creating RC2. There were some outstanding comments on it. If no one has started testing RC2 and there are no objections, we can cancel this vote, quickly merge the PR and create RC3. ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On May

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

> Op 10 mei 2017 om 0:33 schreef Will Stevens : > > > Just to clarify. Wido, the issue you are experiencing is only with basic > networks and also exists in 4.9 right? The issue becomes noticeable when > you have a lot of networks. Is that a fair statement? Well, the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Hi, I analyzed the problematic PR and fixed the issue this way: https://github.com/mike-tutkowski/cloudstack/commit/c463057c82656a4d7564fc9205bb79517317c629 If a couple people could take a look at this code and see what you think, I can create a PR against the RC and we can make use of this

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Today I am working on this PR. Hopefully I will complete it. Yesterday fixed test_01_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_true, test_01_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_false. Today working on RVR related tests. Thanks, Jayapal On May 11, 2017, at 10:38 AM, Will Stevens

Re:Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

HI, Rajani I think these 4 are ready and good for merging into RC3. CLOUDSTACK-9690: Scale CentOS7 VM fails with error #1849 CLOUDSTACK-9017 : VPC VR DHCP broken for multihomed guest VMs #2082 CLOUDSTACK-9824: Resource count for Primary storage is considered twice - while creating and while

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Hi Rajani, Also please include the PR#1866. Thanks, Jayapal > On May 11, 2017, at 10:10 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > Thanks for testing Mike. > > RC3=RC2+PR#2089+Mike'sPR > > Any other additions? > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On May 10, 2017 at

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Is 1866 ready? It looks like CI is failing on a lot of relevant network tests. On May 11, 2017 12:48 AM, "Jayapal Uradi" wrote: Hi Rajani, Also please include the PR#1866. Thanks, Jayapal > On May 11, 2017, at 10:10 AM, Rajani Karuturi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Thanks for testing Mike. RC3=RC2+PR#2089+Mike'sPR Any other additions? ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On May 10, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Tutkowski, Mike (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: I've been running regression tests against the release candidate. So far, all tests but one

Re: Awesome CloudStack

Awesome!!! Great initiative Rene. You going to be at ApacheCon in Miami? Maybe we can give this list a bit of airtime to give it some more visibility. :) *Will Stevens* CTO On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Rene Moser wrote: > Hi > > I started "A

Re: Awesome CloudStack

Hi Rene, That is a great idea! Is the content related to any project that is linked somehow with Apache CloudStack? For instance, what about plugins that are not in the Apache CloudStack codebase? I work in the development of the Autonomiccs plugin; a plugin that autonomously manages

Re: Awesome CloudStack

Hi Gabriel On 05/10/2017 08:50 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher wrote: > Hi Rene, > > That is a great idea! > > Is the content related to any project that is linked somehow with Apache > CloudStack? As simple as anything "awesome" or let's say useful that is related to the CloudStack ecosystem. What

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

OK, here’s the gist of the problem: In StorageManagerImpl.cleanupStorage(boolean), the following line in 4.9 List vols = _volsDao.listVolumesToBeDestroyed(new Date(System.currentTimeMillis() - ((long) StorageCleanupDelay.value() << 10))); was changed to the following in

Re: Awesome CloudStack

On 05/10/2017 08:50 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher wrote: > I work in the development of the Autonomiccs plugin; a plugin that > autonomously manages environments orchestrated by Apache CloudStack (more > details at [1]). Do you believe that it would be interesting adding plugins > such as

Re: Awesome CloudStack

Hi Will On 05/10/2017 07:49 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Awesome!!! Great initiative Rene. You going to be at ApacheCon in Miami? Sad to say but no, I can not make it. > Maybe we can give this list a bit of airtime to give it some more > visibility. :) That would be awesome! ;)

Re: ovf file parser

Hey Abhi, I am not sure where an ISO comes into play. I did not work with any ISOs in my flow. Maybe the OVA is generated in a different way? Do you have control over the way the OVA is created? I was using the following command to export a VM from VMware using the 'ovftool', which would

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

I've been running regression tests against the release candidate. So far, all tests but one have passed. The failing test is related to the storage cleanup thread. It looks like some code was changed in 4.10 with regards to this thread and that change is causing a problem around cleanup for

Awesome CloudStack

Hi I started "A curated list of bookmarks, packages, tutorials, videos and other cool resources from the CloudStack ecosystem" on https://github.com/resmo/awesome-cloudstack Feel free to extend it by sending PRs ;) René

Re: GSoC'17

Sverrir, I had looked at Guacamole before I settled with NoVNC for this proposal. I found Guacamole to be too heavy to be an integral part of Cloudstack. You require another database setup and the users have to somehow be matched. I'd be interested to know more about your approach to this.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Separate creation and backup operations for a volume snapshot

Hi Nathan, This option to choose between primary and secondary was added by me a while back. You want to look at https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600 On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Nathan Johnson wrote: > Harika Punna wrote: > > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Separate creation and backup operations for a volume snapshot

Oops I meant Harika, I know that Nathan you were working on something like this a while back with Ceph so I assumed you where the one who proposed this. Anyways, Harika, look at the locationType parameter in the CreateSnaphsot API command. This is what you are looking to implement. Note that this