Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Patrick Dube]

Hello all,

I am have found that the VPC router rules are not reapplied correctly if
the router is restarted, which severely breaks the VPC (e.g. you can't
deploy a VM if it's password is set via cloud-init). I have a PR to fix the
restart that I will open today. More details in the PR. Also, if the
userData is not padded correctly, this will prevent subsequent deployments
in the VPC

Regards,



On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote:

> I have merged the following PRs in preparation for RC2:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1609
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1601
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1595
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1455
>
> I am doing a 3rd round of tests on the following PRs since they both showed
> the same error on two different CI environments on two consecutive runs:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1594
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583
>
> Any feedback on these last two would be appreciated.  I would like to merge
> them before I push the RC2 if possible.
>
> I would like to cut RC2 tonight.
>
> Cheers,
>
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
>
> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Please add this PR on your list. That will fix the spanish localization
> > display. Thanks
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583
> >
> > On 12/07/2016 19:17, Will Stevens wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you gentlemen.  I have been following the 1608 PR from afar and I
> >> will review your list Wido.  I will get my CI chugging with some of
> those
> >> PRs today.
> >>
> >> Thx,
> >>
> >> *Will STEVENS*
> >> Lead Developer
> >>
> >> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> >> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> >> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Will,
> >>>
> >>> These are on my list:
> >>>
> >>> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
> >>> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
> >>> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608
> >>>
> >>> Those 3 should fix all the -1 votes and discussion on the list.
> >>>
> >>> Wido
> >>>
> >>> Op 12 juli 2016 om 18:14 schreef Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you, so this RC has officially failed.  Can you guys please
> review
> >>>> those PRs and give me code review so I can be confident with those
> PRs.
> >>>>
> >>> I
> >>>
> >>>> will run testing on those two PRs to make sure things don't break with
> >>>>
> >>> them.
> >>>
> >>>> Is there anything else that needs to be added to the next RC, please
> >>>>
> >>> speak
> >>>
> >>>> now so we can streamline this next RC.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> *Will STEVENS*
> >>>> Lead Developer
> >>>>
> >>>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> >>>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> >>>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> >>>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi all, I vote -1 and would like to see the jdbc:mysql and
> site-to-site
> >>>>> vpn fixed in 4.9.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>> Sean
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Original Message-
> >>>>> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 1:48 AM
> >>>>> To: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>; de

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Will Stevens]

I have merged the following PRs in preparation for RC2:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1609
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1601
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1595
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1455

I am doing a 3rd round of tests on the following PRs since they both showed
the same error on two different CI environments on two consecutive runs:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1594
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583

Any feedback on these last two would be appreciated.  I would like to merge
them before I push the RC2 if possible.

I would like to cut RC2 tonight.

Cheers,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote:

>
> Please add this PR on your list. That will fix the spanish localization
> display. Thanks
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583
>
> On 12/07/2016 19:17, Will Stevens wrote:
>
>> Thank you gentlemen.  I have been following the 1608 PR from afar and I
>> will review your list Wido.  I will get my CI chugging with some of those
>> PRs today.
>>
>> Thx,
>>
>> *Will STEVENS*
>> Lead Developer
>>
>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Will,
>>>
>>> These are on my list:
>>>
>>> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
>>> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
>>> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608
>>>
>>> Those 3 should fix all the -1 votes and discussion on the list.
>>>
>>> Wido
>>>
>>> Op 12 juli 2016 om 18:14 schreef Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you, so this RC has officially failed.  Can you guys please review
>>>> those PRs and give me code review so I can be confident with those PRs.
>>>>
>>> I
>>>
>>>> will run testing on those two PRs to make sure things don't break with
>>>>
>>> them.
>>>
>>>> Is there anything else that needs to be added to the next RC, please
>>>>
>>> speak
>>>
>>>> now so we can streamline this next RC.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> *Will STEVENS*
>>>> Lead Developer
>>>>
>>>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>>>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
>>>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all, I vote -1 and would like to see the jdbc:mysql and site-to-site
>>>>> vpn fixed in 4.9.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> Sean
>>>>>
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 1:48 AM
>>>>> To: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Op 11 juli 2016 om 22:40 schreef Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One small comment since strongSwan didn't make it into 4.9.  There is
>>>>>>
>>>>> still a very simple bug in enabling PFS for site-to-site VPNs.  The
>>>>>
>>>> code
>>>
>>>> checks the Dead Peer Detection (DPD) variable instead of the PFS
>>>>>
>>>> variable
>>>
>>>> when determining whether or not to enable PFS for the site-to-site VPN.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is the 1-line of code that is broken.  You can see how it
>>>>>>
>>>>> refers to
>>>
>>>> dpd to set pfs.
>>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Milamber]

Please add this PR on your list. That will fix the spanish localization 
display. Thanks


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583

On 12/07/2016 19:17, Will Stevens wrote:

Thank you gentlemen.  I have been following the 1608 PR from afar and I
will review your list Wido.  I will get my CI chugging with some of those
PRs today.

Thx,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote:


Hi Will,

These are on my list:

- https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
- https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
- https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608

Those 3 should fix all the -1 votes and discussion on the list.

Wido


Op 12 juli 2016 om 18:14 schreef Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>:


Thank you, so this RC has officially failed.  Can you guys please review
those PRs and give me code review so I can be confident with those PRs.

I

will run testing on those two PRs to make sure things don't break with

them.

Is there anything else that needs to be added to the next RC, please

speak

now so we can streamline this next RC.

Thanks,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>

wrote:

Hi all, I vote -1 and would like to see the jdbc:mysql and site-to-site
vpn fixed in 4.9.

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480

Thanks!
Sean

-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 1:48 AM
To: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1



Op 11 juli 2016 om 22:40 schreef Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>:


Hi all,

One small comment since strongSwan didn't make it into 4.9.  There is

still a very simple bug in enabling PFS for site-to-site VPNs.  The

code

checks the Dead Peer Detection (DPD) variable instead of the PFS

variable

when determining whether or not to enable PFS for the site-to-site VPN.

Here is the 1-line of code that is broken.  You can see how it

refers to

dpd to set pfs.

file.addeq(" pfs=%s" % CsHelper.bool_to_yn(obj['dpd']))

This pull request fixes the issue, but was not merged since we were

going to strongSwan.  It would be nice if this bug fix was put into

4.9.0

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480


Would it make you a -1 for you without this PR? If so, please vote -1

:)

Wido


Thanks!
Sean

-Original Message-
From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 3:52 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

Hi All,

I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a

vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:


https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546

Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb

I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release

tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/

PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to

indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,

Will

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Will Stevens]

Thank you gentlemen.  I have been following the 1608 PR from afar and I
will review your list Wido.  I will get my CI chugging with some of those
PRs today.

Thx,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote:

> Hi Will,
>
> These are on my list:
>
> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608
>
> Those 3 should fix all the -1 votes and discussion on the list.
>
> Wido
>
> > Op 12 juli 2016 om 18:14 schreef Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>:
> >
> >
> > Thank you, so this RC has officially failed.  Can you guys please review
> > those PRs and give me code review so I can be confident with those PRs.
> I
> > will run testing on those two PRs to make sure things don't break with
> them.
> >
> > Is there anything else that needs to be added to the next RC, please
> speak
> > now so we can streamline this next RC.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > *Will STEVENS*
> > Lead Developer
> >
> > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all, I vote -1 and would like to see the jdbc:mysql and site-to-site
> > > vpn fixed in 4.9.
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Sean
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 1:48 AM
> > > To: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> > >
> > >
> > > > Op 11 juli 2016 om 22:40 schreef Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > One small comment since strongSwan didn't make it into 4.9.  There is
> > > still a very simple bug in enabling PFS for site-to-site VPNs.  The
> code
> > > checks the Dead Peer Detection (DPD) variable instead of the PFS
> variable
> > > when determining whether or not to enable PFS for the site-to-site VPN.
> > > >
> > > > Here is the 1-line of code that is broken.  You can see how it
> refers to
> > > dpd to set pfs.
> > > >
> > > > file.addeq(" pfs=%s" % CsHelper.bool_to_yn(obj['dpd']))
> > > >
> > > > This pull request fixes the issue, but was not merged since we were
> > > going to strongSwan.  It would be nice if this bug fix was put into
> 4.9.0
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
> > > >
> > >
> > > Would it make you a -1 for you without this PR? If so, please vote -1
> :)
> > >
> > > Wido
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > Sean
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 3:52 PM
> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
> > > >
> > > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > > >
> > >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> > > > Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> > > >
> > > > I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
> > > tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
> > > >
> > > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > > > location):
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> > > >
> > > > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Will
> > >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Wido den Hollander]

Hi Will,

These are on my list:

- https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
- https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
- https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608

Those 3 should fix all the -1 votes and discussion on the list.

Wido

> Op 12 juli 2016 om 18:14 schreef Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>:
> 
> 
> Thank you, so this RC has officially failed.  Can you guys please review
> those PRs and give me code review so I can be confident with those PRs.  I
> will run testing on those two PRs to make sure things don't break with them.
> 
> Is there anything else that needs to be added to the next RC, please speak
> now so we can streamline this next RC.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
> 
> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> 
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all, I vote -1 and would like to see the jdbc:mysql and site-to-site
> > vpn fixed in 4.9.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Sean
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 1:48 AM
> > To: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> >
> >
> > > Op 11 juli 2016 om 22:40 schreef Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > One small comment since strongSwan didn't make it into 4.9.  There is
> > still a very simple bug in enabling PFS for site-to-site VPNs.  The code
> > checks the Dead Peer Detection (DPD) variable instead of the PFS variable
> > when determining whether or not to enable PFS for the site-to-site VPN.
> > >
> > > Here is the 1-line of code that is broken.  You can see how it refers to
> > dpd to set pfs.
> > >
> > > file.addeq(" pfs=%s" % CsHelper.bool_to_yn(obj['dpd']))
> > >
> > > This pull request fixes the issue, but was not merged since we were
> > going to strongSwan.  It would be nice if this bug fix was put into 4.9.0
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
> > >
> >
> > Would it make you a -1 for you without this PR? If so, please vote -1 :)
> >
> > Wido
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Sean
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 3:52 PM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> > >
> > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> > > Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> > >
> > > I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
> > tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
> > >
> > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > > location):
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> > >
> > > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > >
> > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> > >
> > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Will
> >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Simon Weller]

Will,


Here's another PR you might want to consider: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608

[https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/1444686?v=3=400]<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608>

Cleanup RBD contexts after exceptions to prevent potential agent crash by 
leprechau · Pull Request #1608 · 
apache/cloudstack<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608>
github.com
We noticed that when an exception occurs within the cleanup loop inside the 
deletePhysicalDisk routine that the previously allocated contexts are not 
cleaned up. This seemed to cause an eventual c...

It fixes a segfault in the agent that we discovered when we had a misconfigured 
ceph ACL and also greatly improves logging.

I see pdube also posted this PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1609

We've pulled it in for testing.

- Si





- Si



From: williamstev...@gmail.com <williamstev...@gmail.com> on behalf of Will 
Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 11:14 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

Thank you, so this RC has officially failed.  Can you guys please review
those PRs and give me code review so I can be confident with those PRs.  I
will run testing on those two PRs to make sure things don't break with them.

Is there anything else that needs to be added to the next RC, please speak
now so we can streamline this next RC.

Thanks,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com> wrote:

> Hi all, I vote -1 and would like to see the jdbc:mysql and site-to-site
> vpn fixed in 4.9.
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
>
> Thanks!
> Sean
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 1:48 AM
> To: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
>
>
> > Op 11 juli 2016 om 22:40 schreef Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>:
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > One small comment since strongSwan didn't make it into 4.9.  There is
> still a very simple bug in enabling PFS for site-to-site VPNs.  The code
> checks the Dead Peer Detection (DPD) variable instead of the PFS variable
> when determining whether or not to enable PFS for the site-to-site VPN.
> >
> > Here is the 1-line of code that is broken.  You can see how it refers to
> dpd to set pfs.
> >
> > file.addeq(" pfs=%s" % CsHelper.bool_to_yn(obj['dpd']))
> >
> > This pull request fixes the issue, but was not merged since we were
> going to strongSwan.  It would be nice if this bug fix was put into 4.9.0
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
> >
>
> Would it make you a -1 for you without this PR? If so, please vote -1 :)
>
> Wido
>
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Sean
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 3:52 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> > Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> >
> > I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
> tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Will
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Will Stevens]

Thank you, so this RC has officially failed.  Can you guys please review
those PRs and give me code review so I can be confident with those PRs.  I
will run testing on those two PRs to make sure things don't break with them.

Is there anything else that needs to be added to the next RC, please speak
now so we can streamline this next RC.

Thanks,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com> wrote:

> Hi all, I vote -1 and would like to see the jdbc:mysql and site-to-site
> vpn fixed in 4.9.
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
>
> Thanks!
> Sean
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 1:48 AM
> To: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
>
>
> > Op 11 juli 2016 om 22:40 schreef Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>:
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > One small comment since strongSwan didn't make it into 4.9.  There is
> still a very simple bug in enabling PFS for site-to-site VPNs.  The code
> checks the Dead Peer Detection (DPD) variable instead of the PFS variable
> when determining whether or not to enable PFS for the site-to-site VPN.
> >
> > Here is the 1-line of code that is broken.  You can see how it refers to
> dpd to set pfs.
> >
> > file.addeq(" pfs=%s" % CsHelper.bool_to_yn(obj['dpd']))
> >
> > This pull request fixes the issue, but was not merged since we were
> going to strongSwan.  It would be nice if this bug fix was put into 4.9.0
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
> >
>
> Would it make you a -1 for you without this PR? If so, please vote -1 :)
>
> Wido
>
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Sean
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 3:52 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> > Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> >
> > I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
> tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Will
>

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Sean Lair]

Hi all, I vote -1 and would like to see the jdbc:mysql and site-to-site vpn 
fixed in 4.9.

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480

Thanks!
Sean

-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 1:48 AM
To: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1


> Op 11 juli 2016 om 22:40 schreef Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>:
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> One small comment since strongSwan didn't make it into 4.9.  There is still a 
> very simple bug in enabling PFS for site-to-site VPNs.  The code checks the 
> Dead Peer Detection (DPD) variable instead of the PFS variable when 
> determining whether or not to enable PFS for the site-to-site VPN.
> 
> Here is the 1-line of code that is broken.  You can see how it refers to dpd 
> to set pfs.
> 
> file.addeq(" pfs=%s" % CsHelper.bool_to_yn(obj['dpd']))
> 
> This pull request fixes the issue, but was not merged since we were going to 
> strongSwan.  It would be nice if this bug fix was put into 4.9.0
> 
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
> 

Would it make you a -1 for you without this PR? If so, please vote -1 :)

Wido

> 
> Thanks!
> Sean
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 3:52 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> 
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> 
> I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release 
> tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
> 
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> 
> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> 
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> 
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
> "(binding)" with their vote?
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Will

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Wido den Hollander]

> Op 11 juli 2016 om 22:40 schreef Sean Lair :
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> One small comment since strongSwan didn't make it into 4.9.  There is still a 
> very simple bug in enabling PFS for site-to-site VPNs.  The code checks the 
> Dead Peer Detection (DPD) variable instead of the PFS variable when 
> determining whether or not to enable PFS for the site-to-site VPN.
> 
> Here is the 1-line of code that is broken.  You can see how it refers to dpd 
> to set pfs.
> 
> file.addeq(" pfs=%s" % CsHelper.bool_to_yn(obj['dpd']))
> 
> This pull request fixes the issue, but was not merged since we were going to 
> strongSwan.  It would be nice if this bug fix was put into 4.9.0
> 
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
> 

Would it make you a -1 for you without this PR? If so, please vote -1 :)

Wido

> 
> Thanks!
> Sean
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 3:52 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> 
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> 
> I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release 
> tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
> 
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> 
> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> 
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> 
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
> "(binding)" with their vote?
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Will

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Wido den Hollander]

> Op 11 juli 2016 om 20:33 schreef Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com>:
> 
> 
> Hey Will,
> 
> I was referring to the need to add:
> 
> 
> db.cloud.driver=jdbc:mysql
> 
> db.usage.driver=jdbc:mysql
> 
> db.simulator.driver=jdbc:mysql
> 
> to db.properties when upgrading.
> 
> Asking admins to add this manually won’t give the impression of a 
> ‘well-packaged’ product.  And I suspect will end up like the manually 
> encrypting vmware passwords step, which was required for one upgrade, and now 
> clients constantly ask us if they need to repeat the step, because its 
> carried forward to every upgrade note.
> 

Yes, makes sense. I filed a PR:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610

Wido

> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul Angus
> 
> From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of 
> Will Stevens
> Sent: 11 July 2016 14:10
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> 
> Hi Paul,
> Can you review the discussion here to see if it clears anything up: 
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-215479369
> 
> Can you help me understand what you are expecting the functionality to be and 
> what you are experiencing?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Will STEVENS
> Lead Developer
> 
> CloudOps | Cloud Solutions Experts
> 420 rue Guy | Montreal | Quebec | H3J 1S6
> w cloudops.com<http://cloudops.com/> | tw @CloudOps_
> 
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Paul Angus 
> <paul.an...@shapeblue.com<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> Is it not possible to add the additional entries into db.properties when 
> CloudStack is upgrading rather than manually? If it is possible, then 
> manually intervention is a -1 in my book.
> Sure it's not a big fix required - but it's still required for CloudStack to 
> work in a slick manner.  We're trying to improve the user experience.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul Angus
> 
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
> 
> 
> 
> 
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>   
>  
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Milamber [mailto:milam...@apache.org<mailto:milam...@apache.org>]
> Sent: 10 July 2016 12:06
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> 
> Hello,
> 
> My vote +1 (binding)
> 
> 
> Tests are passed on a virtual topology of servers  (CS over CS)
> (1mgr+2nodes+1nfs) :
> 
> 1/ Fresh install of 4.9.0RC1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.4 + KVM + NFS : OK 
> Some standard tests with success (create vm, migration, HA, create networks, 
> create user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, create snapshot, 
> restore snapshot, create template, ip association, ip release, static nat, 
> firewall rule) Some tests with cloudstack ansible module with sucess too 
> (create network, register templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)
> 
> 2/ Test upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.9.0RC1 : OK with the same remarks than Wido 
> (need to add JDBC driver type in db.properties)
> 
> 3/ Tests of all localizations of Web UI of 4.9RC1 : Localization works well 
> except Spanish: the Web UI won't display due of 2 localization strings with a 
> escaped quote (from Transifex)
> 'label.number.of.system.vms': 'Número de VM\\'s del Systema',
> 'label.vm.state': 'Estado de VM\\'s',
> Fixed in the PR1583
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583
> 
> 
> Perhaps add in the Release notes this 2 issues (jdbc type & spanish l10n)
> 
> Thanks to the RM.
> 
> Milamber
> 
> 
> 
> On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
> > refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> > Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> >
> > I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
> > tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Will
> >
>

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Sean Lair]

Hi all,

One small comment since strongSwan didn't make it into 4.9.  There is still a 
very simple bug in enabling PFS for site-to-site VPNs.  The code checks the 
Dead Peer Detection (DPD) variable instead of the PFS variable when determining 
whether or not to enable PFS for the site-to-site VPN.

Here is the 1-line of code that is broken.  You can see how it refers to dpd to 
set pfs.

file.addeq(" pfs=%s" % CsHelper.bool_to_yn(obj['dpd']))

This pull request fixes the issue, but was not merged since we were going to 
strongSwan.  It would be nice if this bug fix was put into 4.9.0

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480


Thanks!
Sean

-Original Message-
From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 3:52 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

Hi All,

I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb

I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release tomorrow. 
 If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/

PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,

Will

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Tutkowski, Mike]

This one isn't a show stopper, but I noticed when setting up a new cloud in a 
XenServer environment that an SR remains that points to secondary storage after 
the system VMs have been deployed.

http://imgur.com/5pEnkm9

We had chatted a bit about this on the list a while back and it seemed like 
this problem was solved, but now it seems it has not been.

In any event, this does not change my +1. I just wanted to note this.

From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 9, 2016 12:22 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

I am +1 based on having successfully run the following tests:

TestVolumes.py (once using newly introduced XenSever SR-resigning logic and 
once without doing so)
TestSnapshots.py
TestVMSnapshots.py
TestAddRemoveHosts.py

Test Details:

TestVolumes (using XenServer SR-resigning logic):

test_00_check_template_cache (TestVolumes.TestVolumes) ... === TestName: 
test_00_check_template_cache | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to a stopped virtual machine, then start VM ... === TestName: 
test_01_attach_new_volume_to_stopped_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach, detach, and attach volume to a running VM ... === TestName: 
test_02_attach_detach_attach_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach volume to running VM, then reboot. ... === TestName: 
test_03_attached_volume_reboot_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach volume from a running VM, then reboot. ... === TestName: 
test_04_detach_volume_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach volume from a stopped VM, then start. ... === TestName: 
test_05_detach_vol_stopped_VM_start | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to a stopped virtual machine, then start VM ... === TestName: 
test_06_attach_volume_to_stopped_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Destroy and expunge VM with attached volume ... === TestName: 
test_07_destroy_expunge_VM_with_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete volume that was attached to a VM and is detached now ... === TestName: 
test_08_delete_volume_was_attached | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a data disk to a VM in one account and attach another data disk to a VM 
in another account ... === TestName: test_09_attach_volumes_multiple_accounts | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach more than one disk to a VM ... === TestName: 
test_10_attach_more_than_one_disk_to_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 11 tests in 2304.098s

OK

TestVolumes (not using XenServer SR-resigning logic):

test_00_check_template_cache (TestVolumes.TestVolumes) ... === TestName: 
test_00_check_template_cache | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to a stopped virtual machine, then start VM ... === TestName: 
test_01_attach_new_volume_to_stopped_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach, detach, and attach volume to a running VM ... === TestName: 
test_02_attach_detach_attach_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach volume to running VM, then reboot. ... === TestName: 
test_03_attached_volume_reboot_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach volume from a running VM, then reboot. ... === TestName: 
test_04_detach_volume_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach volume from a stopped VM, then start. ... === TestName: 
test_05_detach_vol_stopped_VM_start | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to a stopped virtual machine, then start VM ... === TestName: 
test_06_attach_volume_to_stopped_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Destroy and expunge VM with attached volume ... === TestName: 
test_07_destroy_expunge_VM_with_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete volume that was attached to a VM and is detached now ... === TestName: 
test_08_delete_volume_was_attached | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a data disk to a VM in one account and attach another data disk to a VM 
in another account ... === TestName: test_09_attach_volumes_multiple_accounts | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach more than one disk to a VM ... === TestName: 
test_10_attach_more_than_one_disk_to_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 11 tests in 2023.939s

OK

TestSnapshots:

test_01_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_snapshot (TestSnapshots.TestSnapshots) 
... === TestName: test_01_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_snapshot | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
test_02_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_volume (TestSnapshots.TestSnapshots) 
... === TestName: test_02_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_volume | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
test_03_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_volume_and_sf_snapshot 
(TestSnapshots.TestSnapshots) ... === TestName: 
test_03_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_volume_and_sf_snapshot | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 3 tests in 7311.959s

OK

TestVMSnapshots:

test_01_take_VM_snapshot (TestVMSnapshots.TestVMSnapshots) ... === TestName: 
test_01_take_VM_snapshot | Status : SUCCESS 

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Paul Angus]

Hey Will,

I was referring to the need to add:


db.cloud.driver=jdbc:mysql

db.usage.driver=jdbc:mysql

db.simulator.driver=jdbc:mysql

to db.properties when upgrading.

Asking admins to add this manually won’t give the impression of a 
‘well-packaged’ product.  And I suspect will end up like the manually 
encrypting vmware passwords step, which was required for one upgrade, and now 
clients constantly ask us if they need to repeat the step, because its carried 
forward to every upgrade note.


Kind regards,

Paul Angus

From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of 
Will Stevens
Sent: 11 July 2016 14:10
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

Hi Paul,
Can you review the discussion here to see if it clears anything up: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-215479369

Can you help me understand what you are expecting the functionality to be and 
what you are experiencing?

Thanks,

Will STEVENS
Lead Developer

CloudOps | Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy | Montreal | Quebec | H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com<http://cloudops.com/> | tw @CloudOps_

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Paul Angus 
<paul.an...@shapeblue.com<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
Guys,

Is it not possible to add the additional entries into db.properties when 
CloudStack is upgrading rather than manually? If it is possible, then manually 
intervention is a -1 in my book.
Sure it's not a big fix required - but it's still required for CloudStack to 
work in a slick manner.  We're trying to improve the user experience.

Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Milamber [mailto:milam...@apache.org<mailto:milam...@apache.org>]
Sent: 10 July 2016 12:06
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

Hello,

My vote +1 (binding)


Tests are passed on a virtual topology of servers  (CS over CS)
(1mgr+2nodes+1nfs) :

1/ Fresh install of 4.9.0RC1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.4 + KVM + NFS : OK Some 
standard tests with success (create vm, migration, HA, create networks, create 
user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, create snapshot, restore 
snapshot, create template, ip association, ip release, static nat, firewall 
rule) Some tests with cloudstack ansible module with sucess too (create 
network, register templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)

2/ Test upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.9.0RC1 : OK with the same remarks than Wido 
(need to add JDBC driver type in db.properties)

3/ Tests of all localizations of Web UI of 4.9RC1 : Localization works well 
except Spanish: the Web UI won't display due of 2 localization strings with a 
escaped quote (from Transifex)
'label.number.of.system.vms': 'Número de VM\\'s del Systema',
'label.vm.state': 'Estado de VM\\'s',
Fixed in the PR1583
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583


Perhaps add in the Release notes this 2 issues (jdbc type & spanish l10n)

Thanks to the RM.

Milamber



On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
> refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
>
> I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
> tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Will Stevens]

Great, I am working on the Release Notes (and upgrade details) right now,
so I will make sure that gets in there.  Thanks for confirming.  :)

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:

> Will,
>
> Yes, indeed, it should be added to Upgrade notes.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Will Stevens" <wstev...@cloudops.com>
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Monday, 11 July, 2016 18:15:57
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
>
> > Thanks Nux.
> >
> > Should the following information be added to the Release Notes and the
> > Upgrade documentation?
> >
> > Make sure these are added to db.properties:
> >
> > db.cloud.driver=jdbc:mysql
> > db.usage.driver=jdbc:mysql
> > db.simulator.driver=jdbc:mysql
> >
> > I had a look at the files and they seem to have the correct values.  EG:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/utils/conf/db.properties
> >
> > What do you guys think?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > *Will STEVENS*
> > Lead Developer
> >
> > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> >
> >> Other than using Wido's quick fix in db.properties, everything else
> checks
> >> out as far as I can tell.
> >>
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >>
> >> Good job
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >>
> >> Nux!
> >> www.nux.ro
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >> > From: "Nux!" <n...@li.nux.ro>
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > Sent: Monday, 11 July, 2016 16:08:19
> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> >>
> >> > Cool, thanks for clarifying. Too bad Strongswan didn't make it.
> >> > I'll test shortly.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >> >
> >> > Nux!
> >> > www.nux.ro
> >> >
> >> > - Original Message -
> >> >> From: "Will Stevens" <wstev...@cloudops.com>
> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> >> Sent: Monday, 11 July, 2016 16:07:02
> >> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> >> >
> >> >> Yes, we did not change the systemvm templates because features like
> >> >> strongswan, etc, did not make it into this release...
> >> >>
> >> >> *Will STEVENS*
> >> >> Lead Developer
> >> >>
> >> >> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> >> >> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> >> >> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> I take it we're still to use the old 4.6 systemvm template?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Nux!
> >> >>> www.nux.ro
> >> >>>
> >> >>> - Original Message -
> >> >>> > From: "Will Stevens" <williamstev...@gmail.com>
> >> >>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> >>> > Sent: Wednesday, 6 July, 2016 21:52:14
> >> >>> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > Hi All,
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for
> a
> >> vote:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> >> >>> > Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this
> release
> >> >>> > tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> >> >>> > location):
> >> >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> >> >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> >> >>> indicate
> >> >>> > "(binding)" with their vote?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > [ ] +1  approve
> >> >>> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> >> >>> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Thanks,
> >> >>> >
> >> > >> > Will
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Nux!]

Will,

Yes, indeed, it should be added to Upgrade notes.

Thanks!

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Will Stevens" <wstev...@cloudops.com>
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 11 July, 2016 18:15:57
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

> Thanks Nux.
> 
> Should the following information be added to the Release Notes and the
> Upgrade documentation?
> 
> Make sure these are added to db.properties:
> 
> db.cloud.driver=jdbc:mysql
> db.usage.driver=jdbc:mysql
> db.simulator.driver=jdbc:mysql
> 
> I had a look at the files and they seem to have the correct values.  EG:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/utils/conf/db.properties
> 
> What do you guys think?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
> 
> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> 
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> 
>> Other than using Wido's quick fix in db.properties, everything else checks
>> out as far as I can tell.
>>
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>>
>> Good job
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Nux!" <n...@li.nux.ro>
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > Sent: Monday, 11 July, 2016 16:08:19
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
>>
>> > Cool, thanks for clarifying. Too bad Strongswan didn't make it.
>> > I'll test shortly.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> >
>> > Nux!
>> > www.nux.ro
>> >
>> > - Original Message -
>> >> From: "Will Stevens" <wstev...@cloudops.com>
>> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> Sent: Monday, 11 July, 2016 16:07:02
>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
>> >
>> >> Yes, we did not change the systemvm templates because features like
>> >> strongswan, etc, did not make it into this release...
>> >>
>> >> *Will STEVENS*
>> >> Lead Developer
>> >>
>> >> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>> >> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
>> >> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I take it we're still to use the old 4.6 systemvm template?
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> >>>
>> >>> Nux!
>> >>> www.nux.ro
>> >>>
>> >>> - Original Message -
>> >>> > From: "Will Stevens" <williamstev...@gmail.com>
>> >>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >>> > Sent: Wednesday, 6 July, 2016 21:52:14
>> >>> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
>> >>>
>> >>> > Hi All,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>> vote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
>> >>> > Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
>> >>> > tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> >>> > location):
>> >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
>> >>> >
>> >>> > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
>> >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> >>> indicate
>> >>> > "(binding)" with their vote?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > [ ] +1  approve
>> >>> > [ ] +0  no opinion
>> >>> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Thanks,
>> >>> >
>> > >> > Will

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Will Stevens]

Thanks Nux.

Should the following information be added to the Release Notes and the
Upgrade documentation?

Make sure these are added to db.properties:

db.cloud.driver=jdbc:mysql
db.usage.driver=jdbc:mysql
db.simulator.driver=jdbc:mysql

I had a look at the files and they seem to have the correct values.  EG:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/utils/conf/db.properties

What do you guys think?

Cheers,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:

> Other than using Wido's quick fix in db.properties, everything else checks
> out as far as I can tell.
>
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Good job
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Nux!" <n...@li.nux.ro>
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Monday, 11 July, 2016 16:08:19
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
>
> > Cool, thanks for clarifying. Too bad Strongswan didn't make it.
> > I'll test shortly.
> >
> > --
> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >
> > Nux!
> > www.nux.ro
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: "Will Stevens" <wstev...@cloudops.com>
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Sent: Monday, 11 July, 2016 16:07:02
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> >
> >> Yes, we did not change the systemvm templates because features like
> >> strongswan, etc, did not make it into this release...
> >>
> >> *Will STEVENS*
> >> Lead Developer
> >>
> >> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> >> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> >> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I take it we're still to use the old 4.6 systemvm template?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >>>
> >>> Nux!
> >>> www.nux.ro
> >>>
> >>> - Original Message -
> >>> > From: "Will Stevens" <williamstev...@gmail.com>
> >>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >>> > Sent: Wednesday, 6 July, 2016 21:52:14
> >>> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> >>>
> >>> > Hi All,
> >>> >
> >>> > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> >>> > Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> >>> >
> >>> > I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
> >>> > tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
> >>> >
> >>> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> >>> > location):
> >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> >>> >
> >>> > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >>> >
> >>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>> >
> >>> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> >>> indicate
> >>> > "(binding)" with their vote?
> >>> >
> >>> > [ ] +1  approve
> >>> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> >>> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks,
> >>> >
> > >> > Will
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Nux!]

Other than using Wido's quick fix in db.properties, everything else checks out 
as far as I can tell.


+1 (binding)


Good job

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nux!" <n...@li.nux.ro>
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 11 July, 2016 16:08:19
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

> Cool, thanks for clarifying. Too bad Strongswan didn't make it.
> I'll test shortly.
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Will Stevens" <wstev...@cloudops.com>
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Monday, 11 July, 2016 16:07:02
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> 
>> Yes, we did not change the systemvm templates because features like
>> strongswan, etc, did not make it into this release...
>> 
>> *Will STEVENS*
>> Lead Developer
>> 
>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>> 
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
>> 
>>> I take it we're still to use the old 4.6 systemvm template?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> > From: "Will Stevens" <williamstev...@gmail.com>
>>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, 6 July, 2016 21:52:14
>>> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
>>>
>>> > Hi All,
>>> >
>>> > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>>> >
>>> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>> >
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
>>> > Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
>>> >
>>> > I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
>>> > tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
>>> >
>>> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>> > location):
>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
>>> >
>>> > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>> >
>>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>> >
>>> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>> indicate
>>> > "(binding)" with their vote?
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1  approve
>>> > [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >
> >> > Will

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Will Stevens]

Yes, we did not change the systemvm templates because features like
strongswan, etc, did not make it into this release...

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Nux!  wrote:

> I take it we're still to use the old 4.6 systemvm template?
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Will Stevens" 
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, 6 July, 2016 21:52:14
> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> > Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> >
> > I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
> > tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate
> > "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Will
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Nux!]

I take it we're still to use the old 4.6 systemvm template?

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Will Stevens" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 July, 2016 21:52:14
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

> Hi All,
> 
> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> 
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> 
> I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
> tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
> 
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> 
> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> 
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> 
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Will

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Nux!]

Cool, thanks for clarifying. Too bad Strongswan didn't make it.
I'll test shortly.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Will Stevens" <wstev...@cloudops.com>
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 11 July, 2016 16:07:02
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

> Yes, we did not change the systemvm templates because features like
> strongswan, etc, did not make it into this release...
> 
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
> 
> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> 
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> 
>> I take it we're still to use the old 4.6 systemvm template?
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Will Stevens" <williamstev...@gmail.com>
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > Sent: Wednesday, 6 July, 2016 21:52:14
>> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
>>
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>> >
>> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
>> > Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
>> >
>> > I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
>> > tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
>> >
>> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> > location):
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
>> >
>> > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>> >
>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >
>> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate
>> > "(binding)" with their vote?
>> >
>> > [ ] +1  approve
>> > [ ] +0  no opinion
>> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Will

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Wido den Hollander]

> Op 10 juli 2016 om 14:06 schreef Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com>:
> 
> 
> Guys,
> 
> Is it not possible to add the additional entries into db.properties when 
> CloudStack is upgrading rather than manually? If it is possible, then 
> manually intervention is a -1 in my book.
> Sure it's not a big fix required - but it's still required for CloudStack to 
> work in a slick manner.  We're trying to improve the user experience.
> 

We could to this in the postinst of the RPM and DEB packages if we would really 
want to.

Wido

> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul Angus
> 
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>   
>  
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Milamber [mailto:milam...@apache.org] 
> Sent: 10 July 2016 12:06
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> 
> Hello,
> 
> My vote +1 (binding)
> 
> 
> Tests are passed on a virtual topology of servers  (CS over CS)
> (1mgr+2nodes+1nfs) :
> 
> 1/ Fresh install of 4.9.0RC1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.4 + KVM + NFS : OK 
> Some standard tests with success (create vm, migration, HA, create networks, 
> create user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, create snapshot, 
> restore snapshot, create template, ip association, ip release, static nat, 
> firewall rule) Some tests with cloudstack ansible module with sucess too 
> (create network, register templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)
> 
> 2/ Test upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.9.0RC1 : OK with the same remarks than Wido 
> (need to add JDBC driver type in db.properties)
> 
> 3/ Tests of all localizations of Web UI of 4.9RC1 : Localization works well 
> except Spanish: the Web UI won't display due of 2 localization strings with a 
> escaped quote (from Transifex)
> 'label.number.of.system.vms': 'Número de VM\\'s del Systema',
> 'label.vm.state': 'Estado de VM\\'s',
> Fixed in the PR1583
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583
> 
> 
> Perhaps add in the Release notes this 2 issues (jdbc type & spanish l10n)
> 
> Thanks to the RM.
> 
> Milamber
> 
> 
> 
> On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
> > refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> > Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> >
> > I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release 
> > tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Will
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Will Stevens]

Hi Paul,
Can you review the discussion here to see if it clears anything up:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-215479369

Can you help me understand what you are expecting the functionality to be
and what you are experiencing?

Thanks,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> Guys,
>
> Is it not possible to add the additional entries into db.properties when
> CloudStack is upgrading rather than manually? If it is possible, then
> manually intervention is a -1 in my book.
> Sure it's not a big fix required - but it's still required for CloudStack
> to work in a slick manner.  We're trying to improve the user experience.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Milamber [mailto:milam...@apache.org]
> Sent: 10 July 2016 12:06
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
>
> Hello,
>
> My vote +1 (binding)
>
>
> Tests are passed on a virtual topology of servers  (CS over CS)
> (1mgr+2nodes+1nfs) :
>
> 1/ Fresh install of 4.9.0RC1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.4 + KVM + NFS : OK
> Some standard tests with success (create vm, migration, HA, create
> networks, create user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template,
> create snapshot, restore snapshot, create template, ip association, ip
> release, static nat, firewall rule) Some tests with cloudstack ansible
> module with sucess too (create network, register templates, create vm, ip,
> firewall rule)
>
> 2/ Test upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.9.0RC1 : OK with the same remarks than
> Wido (need to add JDBC driver type in db.properties)
>
> 3/ Tests of all localizations of Web UI of 4.9RC1 : Localization works
> well except Spanish: the Web UI won't display due of 2 localization strings
> with a escaped quote (from Transifex)
> 'label.number.of.system.vms': 'Número de VM\\'s del Systema',
> 'label.vm.state': 'Estado de VM\\'s',
> Fixed in the PR1583
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583
>
>
> Perhaps add in the Release notes this 2 issues (jdbc type & spanish l10n)
>
> Thanks to the RM.
>
> Milamber
>
>
>
> On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
> > refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> > Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> >
> > I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
> > tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Will
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[John Burwell]

Paul,

Is this condition a regression in previous behavior?

Thanks,
-John

> 
john.burw...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On Jul 10, 2016, at 8:06 AM, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> 
> Guys,
> 
> Is it not possible to add the additional entries into db.properties when 
> CloudStack is upgrading rather than manually? If it is possible, then 
> manually intervention is a -1 in my book.
> Sure it's not a big fix required - but it's still required for CloudStack to 
> work in a slick manner.  We're trying to improve the user experience.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul Angus
> 
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Milamber [mailto:milam...@apache.org] 
> Sent: 10 July 2016 12:06
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> 
> Hello,
> 
> My vote +1 (binding)
> 
> 
> Tests are passed on a virtual topology of servers  (CS over CS)
> (1mgr+2nodes+1nfs) :
> 
> 1/ Fresh install of 4.9.0RC1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.4 + KVM + NFS : OK 
> Some standard tests with success (create vm, migration, HA, create networks, 
> create user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, create snapshot, 
> restore snapshot, create template, ip association, ip release, static nat, 
> firewall rule) Some tests with cloudstack ansible module with sucess too 
> (create network, register templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)
> 
> 2/ Test upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.9.0RC1 : OK with the same remarks than Wido 
> (need to add JDBC driver type in db.properties)
> 
> 3/ Tests of all localizations of Web UI of 4.9RC1 : Localization works well 
> except Spanish: the Web UI won't display due of 2 localization strings with a 
> escaped quote (from Transifex)
> 'label.number.of.system.vms': 'Número de VM\\'s del Systema',
> 'label.vm.state': 'Estado de VM\\'s',
> Fixed in the PR1583
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583
> 
> 
> Perhaps add in the Release notes this 2 issues (jdbc type & spanish l10n)
> 
> Thanks to the RM.
> 
> Milamber
> 
> 
> 
> On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>> 
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
>> refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
>> Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
>> 
>> I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release 
>> tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
>> 
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
>> 
>> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>> 
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> 
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>> 
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Will
>> 
> 

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Paul Angus]

Guys,

Is it not possible to add the additional entries into db.properties when 
CloudStack is upgrading rather than manually? If it is possible, then manually 
intervention is a -1 in my book.
Sure it's not a big fix required - but it's still required for CloudStack to 
work in a slick manner.  We're trying to improve the user experience.

Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Milamber [mailto:milam...@apache.org] 
Sent: 10 July 2016 12:06
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

Hello,

My vote +1 (binding)


Tests are passed on a virtual topology of servers  (CS over CS)
(1mgr+2nodes+1nfs) :

1/ Fresh install of 4.9.0RC1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.4 + KVM + NFS : OK Some 
standard tests with success (create vm, migration, HA, create networks, create 
user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, create snapshot, restore 
snapshot, create template, ip association, ip release, static nat, firewall 
rule) Some tests with cloudstack ansible module with sucess too (create 
network, register templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)

2/ Test upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.9.0RC1 : OK with the same remarks than Wido 
(need to add JDBC driver type in db.properties)

3/ Tests of all localizations of Web UI of 4.9RC1 : Localization works well 
except Spanish: the Web UI won't display due of 2 localization strings with a 
escaped quote (from Transifex)
'label.number.of.system.vms': 'Número de VM\\'s del Systema',
'label.vm.state': 'Estado de VM\\'s',
Fixed in the PR1583
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583


Perhaps add in the Release notes this 2 issues (jdbc type & spanish l10n)

Thanks to the RM.

Milamber



On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
> refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
>
> I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release 
> tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Milamber]

Hello,

My vote +1 (binding)


Tests are passed on a virtual topology of servers  (CS over CS) 
(1mgr+2nodes+1nfs) :


1/ Fresh install of 4.9.0RC1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.4 + KVM + NFS : OK
Some standard tests with success (create vm, migration, HA, create 
networks, create user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, 
create snapshot, restore snapshot, create template, ip association, ip 
release, static nat, firewall rule)
Some tests with cloudstack ansible module with sucess too (create 
network, register templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)


2/ Test upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.9.0RC1 : OK with the same remarks than 
Wido (need to add JDBC driver type in db.properties)


3/ Tests of all localizations of Web UI of 4.9RC1 : Localization works 
well except Spanish: the Web UI won't display due of 2 localization 
strings with a escaped quote (from Transifex)

'label.number.of.system.vms': 'Número de VM\\'s del Systema',
'label.vm.state': 'Estado de VM\\'s',
Fixed in the PR1583
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583


Perhaps add in the Release notes this 2 issues (jdbc type & spanish l10n)

Thanks to the RM.

Milamber



On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb

I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/

PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,

Will

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Sanjeev Singh]

will get back to you..

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Will Stevens  wrote:

> Milamber, can you describe the steps to reproduce this?
>
> Sanjeev, would you mind reviewing this and give some guidance as to what
> could be the issue?
>
> Thanks,
>
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
>
> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Milamber  wrote:
>
>>
>> The building of plugin Nuage VSP don't work for me.
>>
>> The error is:
>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-plugin-network-vsp: Could
>> not resolve dependencies for project
>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-network-vsp:jar:4.9.0: Failed to collect
>> dependencies for [net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0 (compile),
>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-server:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-utils:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-framework-config:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:tests:4.9.0 (test),
>> org.hamcrest:hamcrest-all:jar:1.3 (test),
>> org.mockito:mockito-all:jar:1.10.19 (test), junit:junit:jar:4.12 (test),
>> org.powermock:powermock-module-junit4:jar:1.6.4 (compile),
>> org.powermock:powermock-api-mockito:jar:1.6.4 (test),
>> org.springframework:spring-test:jar:3.2.16.RELEASE (test),
>> javax.inject:javax.inject:jar:1 (compile)]: Failed to read artifact
>> descriptor for net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0: Could not
>> transfer artifact net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:pom:3.2.8.0 from/to
>> nuage-vsp (http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/): Not authorized ,
>> ReasonPhrase:Unauthorized. -> [Help 1]
>>
>> The URL http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/ ask a login/password.
>>
>> I missed something?
>>
>> Milamber
>>
>>
>>
>> On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>>>
>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
>>> Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
>>>
>>> I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
>>> tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
>>>
>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>> location):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
>>>
>>> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>> indicate
>>> "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Will
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Thank you,
Sanjeev

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Milamber]

On 09/07/2016 04:48, Will Stevens wrote:

Milamber, so that problem seems to be resolved?


Yes the build is ok now.



Let me know how the rest
of your testing goes.  Thanks.  :)


I will run my tests today and send the results (and vote)



*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Milamber  wrote:


Thanks Kris, now that works, I can download the jar file.

This morning the url ask a login/password, now nothing :-).

I've just relaunch my build of CS.

Thanks.


On 08/07/2016 17:10, Kris Sterckx wrote:


Hi Milamber,

Can you pls check whether you are able to download


http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/net/nuage/vsp/nuage-vsp-acs-client/3.2.8.0/nuage-vsp-acs-client-3.2.8.0.jar

from the command terminal you are using to build cloudstack ?

Or from a browser simply (enter the url up to the 3.2.8.0 directory and
see
whether you can see the artifacts).

Thanks

Kris
On Jul 8, 2016 1:47 PM, "Will Stevens"  wrote:

Milamber, can you describe the steps to reproduce this?

Sanjeev, would you mind reviewing this and give some guidance as to what
could be the issue?

Thanks,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Milamber  wrote:

The building of plugin Nuage VSP don't work for me.

The error is:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-plugin-network-vsp:
Could
not resolve dependencies for project
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-network-vsp:jar:4.9.0: Failed to


collect


dependencies for [net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0


(compile),


org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-server:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-utils:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-framework-config:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:tests:4.9.0 (test),
org.hamcrest:hamcrest-all:jar:1.3 (test),
org.mockito:mockito-all:jar:1.10.19 (test), junit:junit:jar:4.12 (test),
org.powermock:powermock-module-junit4:jar:1.6.4 (compile),
org.powermock:powermock-api-mockito:jar:1.6.4 (test),
org.springframework:spring-test:jar:3.2.16.RELEASE (test),
javax.inject:javax.inject:jar:1 (compile)]: Failed to read artifact
descriptor for net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0: Could
not
transfer artifact net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:pom:3.2.8.0 from/to
nuage-vsp (http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/): Not authorized ,
ReasonPhrase:Unauthorized. -> [Help 1]

The URL http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/ ask a login/password.

I missed something?

Milamber



On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a


vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:




https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546


Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb

I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/

PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,

Will

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Tutkowski, Mike]

I am +1 based on having successfully run the following tests:

TestVolumes.py (once using newly introduced XenSever SR-resigning logic and 
once without doing so)
TestSnapshots.py
TestVMSnapshots.py
TestAddRemoveHosts.py

Test Details:

TestVolumes (using XenServer SR-resigning logic):

test_00_check_template_cache (TestVolumes.TestVolumes) ... === TestName: 
test_00_check_template_cache | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to a stopped virtual machine, then start VM ... === TestName: 
test_01_attach_new_volume_to_stopped_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach, detach, and attach volume to a running VM ... === TestName: 
test_02_attach_detach_attach_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach volume to running VM, then reboot. ... === TestName: 
test_03_attached_volume_reboot_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach volume from a running VM, then reboot. ... === TestName: 
test_04_detach_volume_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach volume from a stopped VM, then start. ... === TestName: 
test_05_detach_vol_stopped_VM_start | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to a stopped virtual machine, then start VM ... === TestName: 
test_06_attach_volume_to_stopped_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Destroy and expunge VM with attached volume ... === TestName: 
test_07_destroy_expunge_VM_with_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete volume that was attached to a VM and is detached now ... === TestName: 
test_08_delete_volume_was_attached | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a data disk to a VM in one account and attach another data disk to a VM 
in another account ... === TestName: test_09_attach_volumes_multiple_accounts | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach more than one disk to a VM ... === TestName: 
test_10_attach_more_than_one_disk_to_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 11 tests in 2304.098s

OK

TestVolumes (not using XenServer SR-resigning logic):

test_00_check_template_cache (TestVolumes.TestVolumes) ... === TestName: 
test_00_check_template_cache | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to a stopped virtual machine, then start VM ... === TestName: 
test_01_attach_new_volume_to_stopped_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach, detach, and attach volume to a running VM ... === TestName: 
test_02_attach_detach_attach_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach volume to running VM, then reboot. ... === TestName: 
test_03_attached_volume_reboot_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach volume from a running VM, then reboot. ... === TestName: 
test_04_detach_volume_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach volume from a stopped VM, then start. ... === TestName: 
test_05_detach_vol_stopped_VM_start | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to a stopped virtual machine, then start VM ... === TestName: 
test_06_attach_volume_to_stopped_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Destroy and expunge VM with attached volume ... === TestName: 
test_07_destroy_expunge_VM_with_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete volume that was attached to a VM and is detached now ... === TestName: 
test_08_delete_volume_was_attached | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a data disk to a VM in one account and attach another data disk to a VM 
in another account ... === TestName: test_09_attach_volumes_multiple_accounts | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach more than one disk to a VM ... === TestName: 
test_10_attach_more_than_one_disk_to_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 11 tests in 2023.939s

OK

TestSnapshots:

test_01_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_snapshot (TestSnapshots.TestSnapshots) 
... === TestName: test_01_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_snapshot | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
test_02_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_volume (TestSnapshots.TestSnapshots) 
... === TestName: test_02_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_volume | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
test_03_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_volume_and_sf_snapshot 
(TestSnapshots.TestSnapshots) ... === TestName: 
test_03_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_volume_and_sf_snapshot | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 3 tests in 7311.959s

OK

TestVMSnapshots:

test_01_take_VM_snapshot (TestVMSnapshots.TestVMSnapshots) ... === TestName: 
test_01_take_VM_snapshot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test_02_take_VM_snapshot_with_data_disk (TestVMSnapshots.TestVMSnapshots) ... 
=== TestName: test_02_take_VM_snapshot_with_data_disk | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 2 tests in 784.719s

OK

TestAddRemoveHosts:

test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_1 
(TestAddRemoveHosts.TestAddRemoveHosts) ... === TestName: 
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_1 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_2 
(TestAddRemoveHosts.TestAddRemoveHosts) ... === TestName: 
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_2 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Will Stevens]

Milamber, so that problem seems to be resolved?  Let me know how the rest
of your testing goes.  Thanks.  :)

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Milamber  wrote:

>
> Thanks Kris, now that works, I can download the jar file.
>
> This morning the url ask a login/password, now nothing :-).
>
> I've just relaunch my build of CS.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> On 08/07/2016 17:10, Kris Sterckx wrote:
>
>> Hi Milamber,
>>
>> Can you pls check whether you are able to download
>>
>>
>> http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/net/nuage/vsp/nuage-vsp-acs-client/3.2.8.0/nuage-vsp-acs-client-3.2.8.0.jar
>>
>> from the command terminal you are using to build cloudstack ?
>>
>> Or from a browser simply (enter the url up to the 3.2.8.0 directory and
>> see
>> whether you can see the artifacts).
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Kris
>> On Jul 8, 2016 1:47 PM, "Will Stevens"  wrote:
>>
>> Milamber, can you describe the steps to reproduce this?
>>>
>>> Sanjeev, would you mind reviewing this and give some guidance as to what
>>> could be the issue?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> *Will STEVENS*
>>> Lead Developer
>>>
>>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
>>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Milamber  wrote:
>>>
>>> The building of plugin Nuage VSP don't work for me.

 The error is:
 [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-plugin-network-vsp:
 Could
 not resolve dependencies for project
 org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-network-vsp:jar:4.9.0: Failed to

>>> collect
>>>
 dependencies for [net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0

>>> (compile),
>>>
 org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-server:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
 org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
 org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-utils:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
 org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-framework-config:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
 org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:tests:4.9.0 (test),
 org.hamcrest:hamcrest-all:jar:1.3 (test),
 org.mockito:mockito-all:jar:1.10.19 (test), junit:junit:jar:4.12 (test),
 org.powermock:powermock-module-junit4:jar:1.6.4 (compile),
 org.powermock:powermock-api-mockito:jar:1.6.4 (test),
 org.springframework:spring-test:jar:3.2.16.RELEASE (test),
 javax.inject:javax.inject:jar:1 (compile)]: Failed to read artifact
 descriptor for net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0: Could
 not
 transfer artifact net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:pom:3.2.8.0 from/to
 nuage-vsp (http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/): Not authorized ,
 ReasonPhrase:Unauthorized. -> [Help 1]

 The URL http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/ ask a login/password.

 I missed something?

 Milamber



 On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:

 Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>
 vote:
>>>
 Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
>
>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
>>>
 Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
>
> I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
> tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will
>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Milamber]

Thanks Kris, now that works, I can download the jar file.

This morning the url ask a login/password, now nothing :-).

I've just relaunch my build of CS.

Thanks.

On 08/07/2016 17:10, Kris Sterckx wrote:

Hi Milamber,

Can you pls check whether you are able to download

http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/net/nuage/vsp/nuage-vsp-acs-client/3.2.8.0/nuage-vsp-acs-client-3.2.8.0.jar

from the command terminal you are using to build cloudstack ?

Or from a browser simply (enter the url up to the 3.2.8.0 directory and see
whether you can see the artifacts).

Thanks

Kris
On Jul 8, 2016 1:47 PM, "Will Stevens"  wrote:


Milamber, can you describe the steps to reproduce this?

Sanjeev, would you mind reviewing this and give some guidance as to what
could be the issue?

Thanks,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Milamber  wrote:


The building of plugin Nuage VSP don't work for me.

The error is:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-plugin-network-vsp: Could
not resolve dependencies for project
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-network-vsp:jar:4.9.0: Failed to

collect

dependencies for [net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0

(compile),

org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-server:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-utils:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-framework-config:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:tests:4.9.0 (test),
org.hamcrest:hamcrest-all:jar:1.3 (test),
org.mockito:mockito-all:jar:1.10.19 (test), junit:junit:jar:4.12 (test),
org.powermock:powermock-module-junit4:jar:1.6.4 (compile),
org.powermock:powermock-api-mockito:jar:1.6.4 (test),
org.springframework:spring-test:jar:3.2.16.RELEASE (test),
javax.inject:javax.inject:jar:1 (compile)]: Failed to read artifact
descriptor for net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0: Could not
transfer artifact net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:pom:3.2.8.0 from/to
nuage-vsp (http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/): Not authorized ,
ReasonPhrase:Unauthorized. -> [Help 1]

The URL http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/ ask a login/password.

I missed something?

Milamber



On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:


Hi All,

I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a

vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:



https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546

Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb

I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/

PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,

Will

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Kris Sterckx]

Hi Milamber,

Can you pls check whether you are able to download

http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/net/nuage/vsp/nuage-vsp-acs-client/3.2.8.0/nuage-vsp-acs-client-3.2.8.0.jar

from the command terminal you are using to build cloudstack ?

Or from a browser simply (enter the url up to the 3.2.8.0 directory and see
whether you can see the artifacts).

Thanks

Kris
On Jul 8, 2016 1:47 PM, "Will Stevens"  wrote:

> Milamber, can you describe the steps to reproduce this?
>
> Sanjeev, would you mind reviewing this and give some guidance as to what
> could be the issue?
>
> Thanks,
>
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
>
> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Milamber  wrote:
>
> >
> > The building of plugin Nuage VSP don't work for me.
> >
> > The error is:
> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-plugin-network-vsp: Could
> > not resolve dependencies for project
> > org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-network-vsp:jar:4.9.0: Failed to
> collect
> > dependencies for [net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0
> (compile),
> > org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-server:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
> > org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
> > org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-utils:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
> > org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-framework-config:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
> > org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:tests:4.9.0 (test),
> > org.hamcrest:hamcrest-all:jar:1.3 (test),
> > org.mockito:mockito-all:jar:1.10.19 (test), junit:junit:jar:4.12 (test),
> > org.powermock:powermock-module-junit4:jar:1.6.4 (compile),
> > org.powermock:powermock-api-mockito:jar:1.6.4 (test),
> > org.springframework:spring-test:jar:3.2.16.RELEASE (test),
> > javax.inject:javax.inject:jar:1 (compile)]: Failed to read artifact
> > descriptor for net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0: Could not
> > transfer artifact net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:pom:3.2.8.0 from/to
> > nuage-vsp (http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/): Not authorized ,
> > ReasonPhrase:Unauthorized. -> [Help 1]
> >
> > The URL http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/ ask a login/password.
> >
> > I missed something?
> >
> > Milamber
> >
> >
> >
> > On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
> >>
> >> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >>
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> >> Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> >>
> >> I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
> >> tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
> >>
> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> >> location):
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> >>
> >> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >>
> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>
> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> >> indicate
> >> "(binding)" with their vote?
> >>
> >> [ ] +1  approve
> >> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Will
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Will Stevens]

Thank you for the details Milamber.  I will let Sanjeev provide details on
this.

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Milamber  wrote:

>
>
> On 08/07/2016 12:47, Will Stevens wrote:
>
>> Milamber, can you describe the steps to reproduce this?
>>
>
>
> On my build machine (Ubuntu 14.04), used to build CloudStack since 4.4,
>
> cd myclonedirectory
> git checkout master
> git pull
> git checkout 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> git checkout -b 4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> time dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> Sanjeev, would you mind reviewing this and give some guidance as to what
>> could be the issue?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> *Will STEVENS*
>> Lead Developer
>>
>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Milamber  wrote:
>>
>> The building of plugin Nuage VSP don't work for me.
>>>
>>> The error is:
>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-plugin-network-vsp: Could
>>> not resolve dependencies for project
>>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-network-vsp:jar:4.9.0: Failed to
>>> collect
>>> dependencies for [net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0
>>> (compile),
>>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-server:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
>>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
>>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-utils:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
>>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-framework-config:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
>>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:tests:4.9.0 (test),
>>> org.hamcrest:hamcrest-all:jar:1.3 (test),
>>> org.mockito:mockito-all:jar:1.10.19 (test), junit:junit:jar:4.12 (test),
>>> org.powermock:powermock-module-junit4:jar:1.6.4 (compile),
>>> org.powermock:powermock-api-mockito:jar:1.6.4 (test),
>>> org.springframework:spring-test:jar:3.2.16.RELEASE (test),
>>> javax.inject:javax.inject:jar:1 (compile)]: Failed to read artifact
>>> descriptor for net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0: Could not
>>> transfer artifact net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:pom:3.2.8.0 from/to
>>> nuage-vsp (http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/): Not authorized ,
>>> ReasonPhrase:Unauthorized. -> [Help 1]
>>>
>>> The URL http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/ ask a login/password.
>>>
>>> I missed something?
>>>
>>> Milamber
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,

 I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
 vote:

 Git Branch and Commit SH:


 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
 Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb

 I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
 tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.

 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
 location):
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/

 PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

 Vote will be open for 72 hours.

 For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
 indicate
 "(binding)" with their vote?

 [ ] +1  approve
 [ ] +0  no opinion
 [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

 Thanks,

 Will



>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Milamber]

On 08/07/2016 12:47, Will Stevens wrote:

Milamber, can you describe the steps to reproduce this?



On my build machine (Ubuntu 14.04), used to build CloudStack since 4.4,

cd myclonedirectory
git checkout master
git pull
git checkout 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
git checkout -b 4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
time dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us








Sanjeev, would you mind reviewing this and give some guidance as to what
could be the issue?

Thanks,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Milamber  wrote:


The building of plugin Nuage VSP don't work for me.

The error is:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-plugin-network-vsp: Could
not resolve dependencies for project
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-network-vsp:jar:4.9.0: Failed to collect
dependencies for [net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0 (compile),
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-server:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-utils:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-framework-config:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:tests:4.9.0 (test),
org.hamcrest:hamcrest-all:jar:1.3 (test),
org.mockito:mockito-all:jar:1.10.19 (test), junit:junit:jar:4.12 (test),
org.powermock:powermock-module-junit4:jar:1.6.4 (compile),
org.powermock:powermock-api-mockito:jar:1.6.4 (test),
org.springframework:spring-test:jar:3.2.16.RELEASE (test),
javax.inject:javax.inject:jar:1 (compile)]: Failed to read artifact
descriptor for net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0: Could not
transfer artifact net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:pom:3.2.8.0 from/to
nuage-vsp (http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/): Not authorized ,
ReasonPhrase:Unauthorized. -> [Help 1]

The URL http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/ ask a login/password.

I missed something?

Milamber



On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:


Hi All,

I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb

I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/

PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,

Will

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Will Stevens]

Thank you sir.  :)

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Sanjeev Singh 
wrote:

> will get back to you..
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Will Stevens 
> wrote:
>
>> Milamber, can you describe the steps to reproduce this?
>>
>> Sanjeev, would you mind reviewing this and give some guidance as to what
>> could be the issue?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> *Will STEVENS*
>> Lead Developer
>>
>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Milamber  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The building of plugin Nuage VSP don't work for me.
>>>
>>> The error is:
>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-plugin-network-vsp:
>>> Could not resolve dependencies for project
>>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-network-vsp:jar:4.9.0: Failed to collect
>>> dependencies for [net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0 (compile),
>>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-server:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
>>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
>>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-utils:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
>>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-framework-config:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
>>> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:tests:4.9.0 (test),
>>> org.hamcrest:hamcrest-all:jar:1.3 (test),
>>> org.mockito:mockito-all:jar:1.10.19 (test), junit:junit:jar:4.12 (test),
>>> org.powermock:powermock-module-junit4:jar:1.6.4 (compile),
>>> org.powermock:powermock-api-mockito:jar:1.6.4 (test),
>>> org.springframework:spring-test:jar:3.2.16.RELEASE (test),
>>> javax.inject:javax.inject:jar:1 (compile)]: Failed to read artifact
>>> descriptor for net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0: Could
>>> not transfer artifact net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:pom:3.2.8.0
>>> from/to nuage-vsp (http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/): Not
>>> authorized , ReasonPhrase:Unauthorized. -> [Help 1]
>>>
>>> The URL http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/ ask a login/password.
>>>
>>> I missed something?
>>>
>>> Milamber
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:
>>>
 Hi All,

 I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
 vote:

 Git Branch and Commit SH:

 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
 Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb

 I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
 tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.

 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
 location):
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/

 PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

 Vote will be open for 72 hours.

 For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
 indicate
 "(binding)" with their vote?

 [ ] +1  approve
 [ ] +0  no opinion
 [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

 Thanks,

 Will


>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thank you,
> Sanjeev
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Will Stevens]

Milamber, can you describe the steps to reproduce this?

Sanjeev, would you mind reviewing this and give some guidance as to what
could be the issue?

Thanks,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Milamber  wrote:

>
> The building of plugin Nuage VSP don't work for me.
>
> The error is:
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-plugin-network-vsp: Could
> not resolve dependencies for project
> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-network-vsp:jar:4.9.0: Failed to collect
> dependencies for [net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0 (compile),
> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-server:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-utils:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-framework-config:jar:4.9.0 (compile),
> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:tests:4.9.0 (test),
> org.hamcrest:hamcrest-all:jar:1.3 (test),
> org.mockito:mockito-all:jar:1.10.19 (test), junit:junit:jar:4.12 (test),
> org.powermock:powermock-module-junit4:jar:1.6.4 (compile),
> org.powermock:powermock-api-mockito:jar:1.6.4 (test),
> org.springframework:spring-test:jar:3.2.16.RELEASE (test),
> javax.inject:javax.inject:jar:1 (compile)]: Failed to read artifact
> descriptor for net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0: Could not
> transfer artifact net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:pom:3.2.8.0 from/to
> nuage-vsp (http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/): Not authorized ,
> ReasonPhrase:Unauthorized. -> [Help 1]
>
> The URL http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/ ask a login/password.
>
> I missed something?
>
> Milamber
>
>
>
> On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
>> Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
>>
>> I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
>> tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate
>> "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Will
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Milamber]

The building of plugin Nuage VSP don't work for me.

The error is:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-plugin-network-vsp: 
Could not resolve dependencies for project 
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-network-vsp:jar:4.9.0: Failed to 
collect dependencies for [net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0 
(compile), org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-server:jar:4.9.0 (compile), 
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:4.9.0 (compile), 
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-utils:jar:4.9.0 (compile), 
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-framework-config:jar:4.9.0 (compile), 
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-api:jar:tests:4.9.0 (test), 
org.hamcrest:hamcrest-all:jar:1.3 (test), 
org.mockito:mockito-all:jar:1.10.19 (test), junit:junit:jar:4.12 (test), 
org.powermock:powermock-module-junit4:jar:1.6.4 (compile), 
org.powermock:powermock-api-mockito:jar:1.6.4 (test), 
org.springframework:spring-test:jar:3.2.16.RELEASE (test), 
javax.inject:javax.inject:jar:1 (compile)]: Failed to read artifact 
descriptor for net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:jar:3.2.8.0: Could not 
transfer artifact net.nuage.vsp:nuage-vsp-acs-client:pom:3.2.8.0 from/to 
nuage-vsp (http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/): Not authorized , 
ReasonPhrase:Unauthorized. -> [Help 1]


The URL http://cs.mv.nuagenetworks.net/releases/ ask a login/password.

I missed something?

Milamber


On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb

I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/

PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,

Will

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

[Wido den Hollander]

+1

Tested upgrade from 4.8.0 to 4.9.0 on a Ubuntu 14.04 system.

Upgrades worked, with one note:

2016-07-07 13:40:46,714 ERROR [c.c.u.d.DriverLoader] (main:null) DB driver type 
null is not supported!
2016-07-07 13:40:46,739 WARN  [c.c.u.d.T.Transaction] (main:null) Unable to 
load db configuration, using defaults with 5 connections. Falling back on 
assumed datasource on localhost:3306 using username:password=cloud:cloud. 
Please check your configuration
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: DB driver type null is not 
supported!

Make sure these are added to db.properties:

db.cloud.driver=jdbc:mysql
db.usage.driver=jdbc:mysql
db.simulator.driver=jdbc:mysql

After that the management server started just fine and is running. The Virtual 
Router fixes for Basic zone and multiple IP-ranges also work as intended.

Wido

> Op 6 juli 2016 om 22:52 schreef Will Stevens :
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> 
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> 
> I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
> tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
> 
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> 
> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> 
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> 
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Will