Re: [rng] Usefulness of benchmarks

2016-09-04 Thread Gilles
Hi. On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 15:20:39 +0300, Artem Barger wrote: On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Gilles wrote: "RandomStressTester" is in Commons _Rng_ "src/userguide" example code, while I've just committed "RandomNumberGeneratorBenchmark" in Commons _Math_

Re: [Math] Build fails on Travis

2016-09-04 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Usually there is no special setup in pom.xml required for building in Travis. What you often find is a Special profile for gathering metrics for coveralls. Benedikt Gilles schrieb am So., 4. Sep. 2016 um 15:32: > Hi. > > > For "master", the first failing build is

Re: Back to contributing to Commons Imaging

2016-09-04 Thread sebb
On 3 September 2016 at 17:38, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > sebb schrieb am Sa., 3. Sep. 2016 um 15:29 Uhr: > >> On 3 September 2016 at 13:14, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> > Hi Damjan, >> > >> > nice you're back. I think there is only one

Re: [rng] Usefulness of benchmarks

2016-09-04 Thread Gilles
On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 14:22:04 +0300, Artem Barger wrote: On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Gilles wrote: A few quick runs seems to produce numbers that are now much closer to what JMH produces.[1] What do you think? ​How I can produce results with PerfTestUtils?

Re: [Math] Build fails on Travis

2016-09-04 Thread Gilles
Hi. For "master", the first failing build is #118 after commit "2c47a69". I notice that the Commons Math and Commons Rng POM files differ in a section that seems to require activation under Travis. [I have no clue as to why the Commons Rng one is so much more complicated.] Regards, Gilles

Re: [rng] Usefulness of benchmarks

2016-09-04 Thread Artem Barger
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Gilles wrote: > "RandomStressTester" is in Commons _Rng_ "src/userguide" example > code, while I've just committed "RandomNumberGeneratorBenchmark" > in Commons _Math_ userguide examples (branch "develop"). > > There is a README in

Re: [rng] Usefulness of benchmarks

2016-09-04 Thread Gilles
Hi Artem. I've just updated the usage examples of Commons Math: commit ae8f5f04574be75727f5e948e04bc649cbdbbb3b A few quick runs seems to produce numbers that are now much closer to what JMH produces.[1] What do you think? I'm now fairly comfortable dropping the "PerfTestUtils" column from

Re: [rng] Usefulness of benchmarks

2016-09-04 Thread Artem Barger
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Gilles wrote: > A few quick runs seems to produce numbers that are now much > closer to what JMH produces.[1] > > What do you think? > ​How I can produce results with PerfTestUtils? Is there any script to run RandomStressTester? It

Help with task: Random number generators

2016-09-04 Thread Reza Namvar
I would like to help out with the task listed at https://helpwanted.apache.org/task.html?532e1a73