Re: [Rng] Sonar 'bugs'

Hi. Le dim. 3 mars 2019 à 17:34, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I noted that the Sonar job is no longer failing on Jenkins. Well done for > fixing it. Thanks go to Gavin (INFRA): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17873 > > I looked at the report and it has two bugs for testing floati

Re: [numbers-fraction] Maven surefire plugin error

Hi. Le lun. 4 mars 2019 à 23:21, Eric Barnhill a écrit : > > I am getting a maven error for the surefire plugin, but don't see it listed > as a dependency in numbers-fraction or numbers-core. I see it listed in > numbers-parent, but with no version number. Any ideas what I need to do to > get the

Re: [numbers-fraction] Maven surefire plugin error

Le mar. 5 mars 2019 à 00:29, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > On 4 Mar 2019, at 23:10, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > Le lun. 4 mars 2019 à 23:21, Eric Barnhill a écrit > > : > >> > >> I am getting a maven error for the sure

Re: [ALL] Avoiding duplication of work between GitHub PRs and JIRA

Hi. Le mer. 6 mars 2019 à 15:20, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > > I think for all non cosmetic changes there should be jira issue for the PR. +1 > Source code platforms can come and go (think of SourceForge) so we should > not rely on the GitHub PR as documentation. +1 And I'd like to stress aga

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hi Alex. Le mer. 6 mars 2019 à 16:50, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I would like to merge this PR introducing the new XoShiRo generators: > > https://github.com/apache/commons-rng/pull/20 > > > Can I get a review to check that nothing is obviously bad

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le mer. 6 mars 2019 à 17:27, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 6 Mar 2019, at 16:22, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hi Alex. > > > > Le mer. 6 mars 2019 à 16:50, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> > >> I would like to merge

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le mer. 6 mars 2019 à 16:50, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I would like to merge this PR introducing the new XoShiRo generators: > > https://github.com/apache/commons-rng/pull/20 > > > Can I get a review to check that nothing is obviously bad. In the

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hello. Le mer. 6 mars 2019 à 21:49, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 6 Mar 2019, at 17:11, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Do the two variants produce uncorrelated sequences? > > I will test this when I branch a new PR for just this code. IMHO, it's st

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le mer. 6 mars 2019 à 23:07, Alex Herbert a écrit :> > > > > On 6 Mar 2019, at 21:42, Alex Herbert wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 6 Mar 2019, at 21:24, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >> > >> Hello. > >> > >> Le mer. 6 mars 2019

Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2019 Mentor Registration

Hi. Anyone willing to apply (cf. message below)? Regards, Gilles -- Forwarded message - From: Ulrich Stärk Date: ven. 8 mars 2019 à 20:49 Subject: Google Summer of Code 2019 Mentor Registration To: Cc: d...@community.apache.org Dear PMCs, I'm happy to announce that the ASF

Re: Google Summer of Code 2019 Mentor Registration

Cheers > Bruno > > > > > On Saturday, 9 March 2019, 9:14:24 am NZDT, Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > > > > Hi. > > Anyone willing to apply (cf. message below)? > > Regards, > Gilles > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Ulr

Re: [Parent] RAT check

Le sam. 9 mars 2019 à 23:45, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > Hi all: > > How about making apache-rat:check run automatically in commons-parent? In > the Maven validate phase? > > That would mean one less thing to check when integrating a patch and > validating an RC. +1 [Why not?] Gilles > > Gary

Re: Google Summer of Code 2019 Mentor Registration

Regards, Gilles > > And if we can go forward, I would like to contact that kid and give him > first crack at the stats library -- he went to all the trouble to make a > nice proposal for it and everything last year... > > Eric > > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hello. Le jeu. 7 mars 2019 à 00:44, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 6 Mar 2019, at 22:57, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > >>> > >>> However I will test if XorShift1024Star and XorShift1024StarPhi are > >>> correlated just for com

Re: [Rng] Merge outstanding PRs for construction speed baseline

Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 18:12, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > Hi, > > I'd like to start on improving the methods in rng-simple to create the > RandomSource. > > There are a few PRs outstanding but I think the discussion on this list > was that the new XoShiRo generators are OK. So I would like to merge

Re: Google Summer of Code 2019 Mentor Registration

Hello. Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 01:24, Eric Barnhill a écrit : > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 4:56 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > Hi Eric. > > > > Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 22:22, Eric Barnhill a > > écrit : > > > > > > I am definitely willing to mento

Re: Google Summer of Code 2019 Mentor Registration

at of course (DRY), but in practice, I've witnessed from up close (it happened right here) that people prefer duplication over modularization ("dogfooding"). Best, Gilles > > CheersBruno > > On Tuesday, 12 March 2019, 1:24:24 pm NZDT, Eric Barnhill > wrote:

[Geometry] GSoC 2019

Hello. If there are tasks which you think could be completed as part of GSoC, now is the time to advertize them on JIRA (by applying the label "gsoc2019"). Regards, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache

Re: [Rng] Merge outstanding PRs for construction speed baseline

[Replying to the ML.] Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 13:00, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 11/03/2019 23:54, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 18:12, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'd like to start on improving the

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

[Replying to list.] Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 15:39, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 12/03/2019 15:33, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi Alex. > > Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 12:53, Alex Herbert a écrit > : > > On 11/03/2019 23:44, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hello. &

Re: [GSoC] Example Issues From 2018 or upcoming 2019

Hi Rob. Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 16:09, Rob Tompkins a écrit : > > Hey guys (or maybe Gilles specifically), > > It looks like a good example for GSoC jira issues is: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-32 > . Sure; all labels should be fixed

Re: Google Summer of Code 2019 Mentor Registration

; > > On Tuesday, 12 March 2019, 1:24:24 pm NZDT, Eric Barnhill < > > ericbarnh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 4:56 PM Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Eric. > > > > > > Le ven. 8 mars 2019

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 22:34, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 12 Mar 2019, at 17:12, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > [Replying to list.] > > > > Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 15:39, Alex Herbert > <mailto:alex.d.herb...@gmail.com>> a écrit : > &

Re: [Rng] Merge outstanding PRs for construction speed baseline

Le mer. 13 mars 2019 à 00:19, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 12 Mar 2019, at 16:58, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > [Replying to the ML.] > > > > Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 13:00, Alex Herbert > <mailto:alex.d.herb...@gmail.com>> a écrit :

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hello Alex. Le mer. 13 mars 2019 à 15:37, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > On 13/03/2019 02:20, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 22:34, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> > >> > >>> On 12 Mar 2019, at 17:12, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > &

Re: [Rng] User Guide Quality section

Hello. Le jeu. 14 mars 2019 à 12:58, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I've just added a Jira task to add the new XorShiRo generaters to the > user guide. > > I note that the order of the RNGs in the *Quality* section does not > match the order of the RandomSource enum, nor is it alphabetical. The > lis

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hi Alex. Le ven. 15 mars 2019 à 14:08, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > FYI. > > > I am going to update stdin2testu01.c so that it passes all the input bits > > to TestU01 and try again. > > > > I’ve read some of the code and manual of TestU01 and the values that are > > returned from the unif01_Gen-

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hi. Le ven. 15 mars 2019 à 19:00, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 15 Mar 2019, at 17:37, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hi Alex. > > > > Le ven. 15 mars 2019 à 14:08, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> > >> FYI. > >> &g

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le ven. 15 mars 2019 à 19:03, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > PS. Did you try this test program to check the size of the unsigned long? I'm on 64-bits Debian GNU/Linux, so... sizeof(int) = 4 sizeof(long) = 8 sizeof(unsigned long) = 8 sizeof(uint32_t) = 4 sizeof(double) = 8 [... same as yours, below .

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le dim. 17 mars 2019 à 01:01, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 16 Mar 2019, at 23:10, Alex Herbert wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 16 Mar 2019, at 02:54, Gilles Sadowski >> <mailto:gillese...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>> This

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hi. >>> [...] > >> > >> One actual issue is that we are testing long providers using the long to > >> create 2 int values. Should we test using a series of the upper 32 bits > >> and then a series of the lower 32 bits? > > > > Is that useful since the test now sees the integers as they are produ

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le lun. 18 mars 2019 à 16:49, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 18/03/2019 14:12, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi. > > > >>>> [...] > >>>> > >>>> One actual issue is that we are testing long providers using the long to > >>

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

> > [...] > >> So leave the testing to just ints and document on the user guide that is > >> what we are testing. > > > > +1 > > OK. That seems simplest. > > Given all the stress tests will be rerun shall I go ahead and reorder the > existing files, user guide .apt file and the GeneratorsList to b

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le mar. 19 mars 2019 à 10:26, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 19 Mar 2019, at 10:35, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > >>> [...] > >> > >> Given all the stress tests will be rerun shall I go ahead and reorder the > >> existing fil

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hello. > > [...] > Given all the stress tests will be rerun shall I go ahead and reorder > the existing files, user guide .apt file and the GeneratorsList to be in > the order of the RandomSource enum? > >>> We could wait for the new results before updating the site. > >> I wa

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hi Alex. Le mer. 20 mars 2019 à 01:32, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 19 Mar 2019, at 15:24, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >> > >> I am currently rerunning the dieharder test for the XorShift1024Star > >> composites since that requires a little endian f

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

>> [...] > > I was thinking of a utility for taking the output (of several runs) of > > the test > > suites and generate the table in "apt" format (with correct links). > > I previously did a lot of this when testing the cache of the int and > boolean values. I could not find the scripts on local m

Re: Google Summer of Code 2019 Mentor Registration

Hi Eric. Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 20:02, Eric Barnhill a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:48 AM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > > > There are also a couple of CM packages that would be worth porting > > to [Numbers] or their own component: > >

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le mer. 20 mars 2019 à 15:04, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 20/03/2019 13:08, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > >> - Perhaps there is another place for them? > >> > >> I am happy to not clutter the source repo and keep them somewhere for > >>

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

>> [...] > > Perhaps the "RandomStressTester" should be made more flexible > > and, instead of a hard-coded "GeneratorsList", accept a list of "enum" > > identifiers. e.g. a list (ASCII file) like: > > MT 3 > > MT_64 3 > > SPLIT_MIX_64 3 > > [etc.] > > where the second columns indicates how many ru

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

undefined Le mer. 20 mars 2019 à 21:39, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 20 Mar 2019, at 18:22, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > >>> [...] > >>> Perhaps the "RandomStressTester" should be made more flexible > >>> an

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hello. >>>[...] > > If the user forgets to supply one, the program outputs one, and stops; > > then the user reissues the command? > > Yes: > > > java -jar examples-stress.jar -h > > Print something helpful > > > java -jar examples-stress.jar --template > > Print a template generators list to st

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

> [...] > >>> If the user forgets to supply one, the program outputs one, and stops; > >>> then the user reissues the command? > >> Yes: > >> > >> > java -jar examples-stress.jar -h > >> > >> Print something helpful > >> > >> > java -jar examples-stress.jar --template > >> > >> Print a tem

[All][RNG][Numbers] Broken links on the generated site

Hi. Somehow, that page contains invalid links (for un/subscribe): http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-rng/mailing-lists.html Furthermore, the page itself has a different name than for other components, e.g.: http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-collections/mail-lists.html Actual

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hi Abhishek. Le jeu. 21 mars 2019 à 17:14, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > Dear Sirs/Ma’ams, >I am Abhishek Singh Dhadwal, a student currently pursuing a Bachelor’s > Degree in the field of Computer Science and Engineering in Visvesvaraya > National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, India

Re: [all] What versions of java do we support?

Hello. Le jeu. 21 mars 2019 à 19:13, Rob Tompkins a écrit : > > Hello all, > > I would think that with the Amazon Corretto play at long term support for > java 8 and 11 we would want to build using the latest version of the Corretto > 8-JDK, and we would want to ensure that we work for Java 11.

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hi. Le ven. 22 mars 2019 à 08:28, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > > Dear sir, > > >>But first things first: Have you set up a programming environment for > making your experiments? > I have IntelliJ IDEA community edition along with Netbeans 8.2 with Java > 8u191 installed. > For repository purpo

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hello. Le ven. 22 mars 2019 à 14:48, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > Dear Sir, > >I don't understand what you mean be "screening tests". Sorry. > Certain organisations had held certain micro tasks to be performed by > students in order to increase their chances of selection for the project. I >

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hi Abhishek. Le ven. 22 mars 2019 à 19:48, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > > > > > >Well then, I guess that we consider the micro-tasks which I evoked in > > my previous message: Clone the repository and build the code. > > This is explained in more details here: > > http://commons.apache.org/

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hello. Le sam. 23 mars 2019 à 16:35, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > Dear Sir, > After running $mvn package, I get: > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE > [INFO] > > [INFO] Total time: 19:08 min > [INFO] Finished at: 2019-03-22T23:23:39+

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hi. I see that you use Java 11. Can you try with a different version? We only know that the build should work with Java 6, 7, 8, and 9. Actually, it would be a nice "micro-task" to figure out how to fix that issue (confirmed to also happen with Java 10). Regards, Gilles Le sam. 23 mars 2019 à 1

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

> > Hi. > > > > I see that you use Java 11. > > Can you try with a different version? > > We only know that the build should work with Java 6, 7, 8, and 9. > > > > Actually, it would be a nice "micro-task" to figure out how to fix > > that issue (confirmed to also happen with Java 10). > > I think

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hi Abhishek. Overall it looks good to me (but I'm not used to laying out GSoC proposals so it might be good to have additional comments). I've added a few remarks in the text (see below). Le dim. 24 mars 2019 à 13:09, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > Dear Sir, > > I’ve added skeletal draft of my

Re: [Rng] PractRand

Hi. Le dim. 24 mars 2019 à 16:55, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > Has this testing suite been investigated: > > PractRand > > http://pracrand.sourceforge.net/ I didn't know about it, until coming across from the "Middle-square Weyl PRNG" page. > > It may provide a

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hi. Le dim. 24 mars 2019 à 18:42, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > > Dear Sir, > Honestly, I've no idea about whether this schedule is realistic. I mean: > Assuming full-time commitment, it could probably be finished much faster. ;-) > Oh, okay. As per your estimates, how many days should I alloca

Re: [Rng] User Guide Quality section

> [...] I think that we mostly agreed in another thread. > > Summary of my proposals: > > - Keep the order in the user guide as is but move MT next to MT_64 > - Auto generate the GeneratorsList from the RandomSource enum > - Update all the file names and the user guide to point to the renamed fil

Re: [Rng] PractRand

JIRA report created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/RNG/issues/RNG-86 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [commons-rng] 01/04: RNG-82: Add XorShift1024StarPhi generator

Hi. Nit-pick: Order of constructor arguments (see below). Le lun. 25 mars 2019 à 13:08, a écrit : > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > aherbert pushed a commit to branch master > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng.git > > commit c

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Thanks for the document. I've made some comments. Let's see whether Alex has something to add. Regards, Gilles Le lun. 25 mars 2019 à 14:30, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > Dear Sir, > The revised GSoC proposal has been created(minus the about me section), and > the Google Docs link is provided

Re: [Rng] JDK 11 javadoc support for JPMS modules

Hello. Le lun. 25 mars 2019 à 13:00, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I managed to get the build working for the site on JDK 11. > > https://github.com/apache/commons-rng/pull/32 > > However left as-is it does not work for the java 9 modules that use JPMS > due to the javadoc tool in JDK 11.0.2. > > No

Re: [All][RNG][Numbers] Broken links on the generated site

Anyone has a clue about those issues? Le jeu. 21 mars 2019 à 16:48, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > > Hi. > > Somehow, that page contains invalid links (for un/subscribe): > http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-rng/mailing-lists.html > > Furthermore, the page itself has

Re: [numbers-fraction] merging changes

Last commit I made to "commons-numbers-fraction", more than 3 months ago, is: ---CUT--- commit d0cff0d8f2a249e6c87df323fe635386749f62f4 Author: Gilles Sadowski Date: Mon Dec 17 12:59:24 2018 +0100 NUMBERS-83: Replace calls to JDK deprecated API. ---CUT--- So I've no

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

dly review the document again and check if there are any more final > changes required ? > And, Alex sir, are there any changes required on the document ? Could you > review it too ? Feedback would be highly appreciated ! > > Regards, > Abhishek > > Sent from Mail for Win

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hi. Le mer. 27 mars 2019 à 13:43, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > > > Hello Sir, > > >I don't know what are the hard requirements for the schedule, but > >I would not make such delineation between coding, reviewing and > >testing. > The Elements Of A Quality Proposal in Google’s Guide > (https://

Re: [GSoC] Agile approach to project mentoring

Hello. Le jeu. 28 mars 2019 à 16:43, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > The GSoC guidelines for students writing a proposal [1] is to use the > guidelines or templates of the organization. It then states that certain > elements will improve chances of a proposal including in Deliverables: > > "a brief, c

Re: [GSoC] Submission of Final Draft for GSoC Proposal

Le lun. 1 avr. 2019 à 23:54, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > Dear Alex sir and Giles sir, > May I submit the final draft for the proposal, or should I make any changes > before submission ? > The drive Link for the proposal: : > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dKwGTDYWrqae26v3DdLljvZw9reEfaO5h2

Re: [lang] Towards 3.9

> Any thoughts on doing a 3.9 release of [lang]. I think Benedikt want’s us to > go up with what we have. Any thoughts for or against doing a release? Any objection to fixing https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LANG/issues/LANG-1442 ? Gilles -

Re: [Rng] New stress test application

Hi Alex. Le mer. 3 avr. 2019 à 17:55, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I have decided to demonstrate where I am with the stress test > application. A small project to add command-line support using Picocli > ballooned into a lot of new code. Here's a PR with the new code: > > https://github.com/apache/

Re: [Rng] New stress test application

> [...] > > I did have a look at getting more hardware information to add to the output > reports. With this library: > > https://github.com/oshi/oshi > > I added a command to output system information about the processor: > > java -jar target/rng-utils.jar system >

Re: [all] Should we use MathJaX in Javadoc on all repos?

> > For those unfamiliar with MathJaX, is the javascript mechanism for > accommodating for LaTeX (the math typesetting language, written by Donald > Knuth) in html. > > It could be convenient to use mathematical notation in our javadoc generally. +1 > That said, Java doesn’t do this so it would

Re: [GSoC] Submission of Final Draft for GSoC Proposal

benchmark tests on the SecureRandom algorithms as discussed ? If so, are > there any guidelines/ data on doing so ? This is in module "commons-rng-examples/exmaples-jmh". Regards, Gilles > PS: Thanks for the feedback! > > Regards, > Abhishek > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 4:34 AM

Re: [GSoC] Submission of Final Draft for GSoC Proposal

quot;. > > Regards, > Gilles > > > PS: Thanks for the feedback! > > > > Regards, > > Abhishek > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 4:34 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > > Le lun. 1 avr. 2019 à 23:54, Abhishek Dhadwal a > > > écrit

Re: [all] Should we use MathJaX in Javadoc on all repos? (Was: Re: [jira] [Commented] (NUMBERS-58) Javadoc: Use MathJaX)

> On 05/04/2019 09:27, sebb wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 12:28, Rob Tompkins wrote: > >> For those unfamiliar with MathJaX, is the javascript mechanism for > >> accommodating for LaTeX (the math typesetting language, written by Donald > >> Knuth) in html. > >> > >> It could be convenient to

Re: [GSoC] Submission of Final Draft for GSoC Proposal

Le ven. 5 avr. 2019 à 15:14, Javin Paul a écrit : > > How to unsubscribe from this email list? can someone please help? This is indicated in the messages' footer (see below). HTH, Gilles > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: de

Re: [lang] Towards 3.9

Hi Rob. Le ven. 5 avr. 2019 à 04:27, Rob Tompkins a écrit : > > > > > On Apr 4, 2019, at 9:20 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > >> Any thoughts on doing a 3.9 release of [lang]. I think Benedikt want’s us > >> to go up with what we have. Any thoughts for

Re: [lang] Towards 3.9

Le sam. 6 avr. 2019 à 16:00, Jochen Wiedmann a écrit : > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 4:27 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > > On Apr 4, 2019, at 9:20 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > > >> Any thoughts on doing a 3.9 release of [lang]. I think Benedikt wa

Re: [lang] LANG-1442

Le sam. 6 avr. 2019 à 16:59, Rob Tompkins a écrit : > > @Gilles - thoughts on this wording: > https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/commit/3f43706192b1b75c5023f165534a12b192c31442 > > > ? There is a typo

Re: [commons-lang] branch master updated: (docs) update user use -> user explore

Hi Rob. Le lun. 8 avr. 2019 à 14:16, Rob Tompkins a écrit : > > I think that maybe hits what you guys were getting after with my wording. You probably missed a thread. I've just committed the alternative text. Regards, Gilles > > And you know me, english as a first language, still writing poor

Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

Hi Alex. Le lun. 8 avr. 2019 à 14:36, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > This is a starter for a discussion on the split and jump functionality > for a random generator. > > Split: > > To create a new instance of the generator that is deterministically > based on the state of the current instance but the

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** [parent] Introducing Automatic-Module-Name

> [...] > > > > $ git diff pom.xml > > diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml > > index 2612dd6..54a88e4 100644 > > --- a/pom.xml > > +++ b/pom.xml > > @@ -570,6 +570,7 @@ > > > > ${implementation.build} > > > > ${maven.compiler.source} > > > > ${maven.compil

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** [parent] Introducing Automatic-Module-Name

Le mar. 9 avr. 2019 à 13:03, sebb a écrit : > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 11:43, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > $ git diff pom.xml > > > > diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml > > > > index 2612dd6..54a88e4 100644

Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

Hello. > > Hi Gilles, > > You ask some good questions which I may have been vague about due to > familiarity with the possibilities. I hope to clarify a bit below. > > On 08/04/2019 16:05, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi Alex. > > > > Le lun. 8 avr. 2

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** [parent] Introducing Automatic-Module-Name

Le mar. 9 avr. 2019 à 14:11, Rob Tompkins a écrit : > > > > > On Apr 9, 2019, at 7:21 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Le mar. 9 avr. 2019 à 13:03, sebb > <mailto:seb...@gmail.com>> a écrit : > >> > >

Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

Hello. Le mar. 9 avr. 2019 à 16:42, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > Hi Gilles, > > Lots of sensible discussion here. I'll just put all replies at the end. > > On 09/04/2019 13:28, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hello. > > > >> Hi Gilles, > >> > &g

[RNG] Re: [commons-rng] 02/02: Disable redundant JMH benchmarks and mark as deprecated.

Hello Alex. > [...] > > commit 431a51b8211a40e5e8d9df0406563d4873eb4eb6 > Author: aherbert > AuthorDate: Wed Apr 10 11:01:05 2019 +0100 > > Disable redundant JMH benchmarks and mark as deprecated. Is there and advantage to keeping disabled code? [Usually, it rots silently until nobody knows

Re: [rng] nextInt(int) and nextLong(long) can be improved

Hello. Le mer. 10 avr. 2019 à 15:22, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > On 10/04/2019 13:46, Alex Herbert wrote: > > The code for nextInt(int) checks the range number n is a power of two > > and if so it computes a fast solution: > > > > return (int) ((n * (long) (nextInt() >>> 1)) >> 31); > > > > Th

Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

Hi. > [... long quote skipped where I think we largely agree on the conclusions ...] > So do we have a working idea to: > > - Add interface 'JumpableUniformRandomProvider' Do we need to add "createJumpable" factory methods in "RandomSource" methods or is there a way to avoid the duplication? As

Re: Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

Hi. > > On 10/04/2019 18:58, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi. > > > >> [... long quote skipped where I think we largely agree on the > >> conclusions ...] > >> So do we have a working idea to: > >> > >> - Add interface 'JumpableU

Re: [rng] nextInt(int) and nextLong(long) can be improved

Le mer. 10 avr. 2019 à 18:26, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 10/04/2019 15:59, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Le mer. 10 avr. 2019 à 15:22, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> On 10/04/2019 13:46, Alex Herbert wrote: > >>> The code

Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

> > [...] > > Not adding a dedicated method would mean everyone has to do this: > > JumpableUniformRandomProvider rng = (JumpableUniformRandomProvider) > RandomSource.create(…) > > But adding a mirror methods: > > JumpableUniformRandomProvider RandomSource::createJumpable(…) > LongJumpableUniformR

Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

Hello. > On 11/04/2019 13:22, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>> [...] > >> Not adding a dedicated method would mean everyone has to do this: > >> > >> JumpableUniformRandomProvider rng = (JumpableUniformRandomProvider) > >> RandomSou

Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

Hello. Le lun. 15 avr. 2019 à 01:03, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 14 Apr 2019, at 01:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > >> On 11/04/2019 13:22, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>>>> [...] > >&g

Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

Hello Alex. >>> [...] > > OK so this results in: > > /** > * Some summary. > */ > public interface JumpableUniformRandomProvider extends > UniformRandomProvider { > /** > * Creates a copy of the UniformRandomProvider and advances the > state of the copy. > * The state of the c

Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

Le jeu. 18 avr. 2019 à 21:53, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 18 Apr 2019, at 14:12, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hello Alex. > > > >>>> [...] > >> > >> OK so this results in: > >> > >> /** > &

Re: [commons-parent] branch master updated: japicmp-maven-plugin should not break builds on source incompatible changes by default.

Hi. Le ven. 19 avr. 2019 à 19:09, a écrit : > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > ggregory pushed a commit to branch master > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-parent.git > > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by

Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

Hi. Le sam. 27 avr. 2019 à 15:05, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I have created RNG-97 and RNG-98 for Jump and LongJump. > > Please take a look and comment. > > The documentation highlights the implementation detail that a jump or long > jump creates a copy that is far ahead. The original generator

Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

Hello. > > > > On 27 Apr 2019, at 14:49, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > Le sam. 27 avr. 2019 à 15:05, Alex Herbert > <mailto:alex.d.herb...@gmail.com>> a écrit : > >> > >> I have created RNG-97 and RNG-98 for Jump and

Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

Hi. > > Just a question, I am unclear on the terminology, is „jump“ (did I miss the > discussion leading toot?) something invented here? Not invented here: It's a functionality that exist for some RNG algorithms. > It sounds to me like this is a generator where the state can be cloned and it >

Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

Le dim. 28 avr. 2019 à 17:02, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 28 Apr 2019, at 00:59, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Just a question, I am unclear on the terminology, is „jump“ (did I miss the > > discussion leading toot?) something invented here? It sounds to me like > > this

Re: [rng] Split and Jump functions

Hello. Le lun. 29 avr. 2019 à 19:09, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > On 28/04/2019 19:11, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le dim. 28 avr. 2019 à 17:02, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> > >> > >>> On 28 Apr 2019, at 00:59, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >