Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow rewrites to be JS function

ermouth, I have a EC2 instance running based on your Couch2 AMI and would like to test the rewrite function. What is the syntax of the rewrites? Would be helpful if you made a snippet like this ([ { from:"", to:"/index.html" }, { from:"", to: function(req){

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow rewrites to be JS function

Thanks for your efforts, ermouth I have been playing with it using the community AMI you put up adn it works just great. It is a big step forward for couchapps since it is not possible to use username, or role from userCtx in rewrite rules you can use the users IP address to firewall your system

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow rewrites to be JS function

some graphics. Everything is useful and will > fasten the process ;-) > > Cheers > > Andy > > On 1 Oct 2015 12:38, "Johs Ensby" mailto:j...@b2w.com>> wrote: > Thanks for this Andy, > > I can contribute to the discussion of the feature seen from

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow rewrites to be JS function

user stories / use case down. So I suggest we find good place at >>> the cwiki. So I suggest to use >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Enhancement+Proposals . >>> Do you have write access there? If not, please ping me. >>> >>> Great work!

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow rewrites to be JS function

). >>>> Lotus Notes did also integrate JavaScript inside of their core (Do you >> know >>>> which guy did take part of it?). This have different reasons, but one of >>>> this reasons is to support users with dynamic mutable data directly into >>>>

Re: CouchDB 1.7.0 Roadmap

Giovanni, you said earlier in a conversation about proxy > On 21. okt. 2015, at 17.23, Giovanni Lenzi > wrote: > I think CouchDB already has a forward proxy feature for #1 use case > (http://docs.couchdb.org/en/1.6.1/config/proxying.html >

Re: CouchDB on DigitalOcean

Bill & Clemens, to have a sharable CouchDB server image on DO is what I have been looking at, too. Wrote an article while working on this compareing AWS AMI or DigitalOcean, and intended to continuou as soon as 2-0 /1.7 is here https://medium.com/p/b7b320fb6bae/

Re: Adam Kocoloski is now an IBM Fellow

Congratulations, Adam I'm very proud that I met you at Cloudant back in 2009 johs > On 15. apr. 2016, at 10.50, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > Hey all, > > our own Adam made IBM Fellow! He’s now one of only 267* individuals > who’ve been awarded this honour for their contributions to IBM and > comput

Re: Post on Trigger

Hi Freddy, you are pushing for a feature that I think would fall into a category that earlier discussions on this list pushed aside to a separate list, couch...@couchdb.apache.org I would asume it to be a ' "no-go" for design of philosophical reasons' as you put it based on these discussions. H

Re: CouchDB Next

Congratulations with the 2.0 relase Jan & dev team! I will try to start a discussion on marketing strategy for 3.0 on the marketing list. CouchDB is clearly a developer centric project and has to be (individual motivation is the driving force), but I think a marketing oriented persepective coul

Re: CouchDB helped fighting Ebloa

Agree! Great and inspiring mother-of-more-to-come-story Johs > On 8. nov. 2016, at 11.12, Andy Wenk wrote: > > Hi Jan, > > no one should ever become tired of this topic. This is an awesome story and > an example how well designed software with great ideas in mind can save > lifes! Just thin

CouchDB 2.0 and "Intuitive HTTP/JSON API and designed for Reliability" for couchapps

Hi, we have been using Couch 1.6 with a patch for the rewrite function, but I wanted to see how 2.0 in single node mode was doing these past two days. The test case was a rather big web site with a few databases holding a few thousand documents, images, PDF attachments. It is performing very well

Re: CouchDB 2.0 and "Intuitive HTTP/JSON API and designed for Reliability" for couchapps

Does a curl request work reliably for these attachments? > > B. > >> On 23 May 2017, at 11:47, Johs Ensby wrote: >> >> Hi, >> we have been using Couch 1.6 with a patch for the rewrite function, but I >> wanted to see how 2.0 in single node mode was doing t

Re: Can we fire a http request when any updation is performed in the bucket ?

Hi Lalit, you might want to check out this recent creation by ermouth: > Happy to introduce Couchbox, CouchDB query server augment/substitute. See > it at https://gitlab.com/Couchbox/couchbox > > > Questions are welcomed. > > ermouth Johs > On 18 Jul 20

Re: Workarounds for macOS 2.1.0 binary that won't start up

Thanks, Joan the workaround did not work on MacOS 10.12.5 Here's the crash report br Johs [info] 2017-08-10T04:22:55.196512Z couchdb@localhost <0.7.0> Application couch_log started on node couchdb@localhost [info] 2017-08-10T04:22:55.199784Z couchdb@localhost <0.7.0> Applica

Re: Workarounds for macOS 2.1.0 binary that won't start up

says: >> >> invalid_bind_address >> >> What is your setting for bind_address in your local.ini file? >> If you're running single node, set it to 127.0.0.1 or 0.0.0.0 and >> try again. (Perhaps you have a dynamically-assigned IP address and >> th

Re: Workarounds for macOS 2.1.0 binary that won't start up

e to it, add an error, or > exit here with the attempted path if $TARGET doesn’t exist: > https://github.com/janl/build-couchdb-mac/blob/master/build.sh#L62 > > Best > Jan > -- > >> On 10. Aug 2017, at 07:45, Joan Touzet wrote: >> >> Hi Johs, >>

Re: Shard level querying in CouchDB Proposal

Hi Mike and Geoff, forgive me if I am asking a really stupid question, but wouldn't restricting certain data to specific shards defy the very concept and core benefits of a clustered database? br Johs > On 23 Nov 2017, at 22:49, Geoffrey Cox wrote: > > Ah, yeah, this makes sense to me. I think

CouchDB 1.7.1 vs single node 2.1.1

Hi, could someone give me the top three benefits of using single node 2.1.1 over 1.7.1 and vice versa? Thanks a lot in advance! Johs

Re: CouchDB 1.7.1 vs single node 2.1.1

Thanks Jan johs:) > On 24 Nov 2017, at 17:49, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > >> On 24. Nov 2017, at 06:53, Johs Ensby wrote: >> >> Hi, >> could someone give me the top three benefits of using single node 2.1.1 over >> 1.7.1 and vice versa? > > 2.1

Re: CouchDB running on the Raspberry Pi?

Hi Eric, I think it would be great if you found a way to run couch on Raspberry Pi, preferably Ubuntu Mate. Performance will surely not be great, but more important I would think it could be a great demonstration of how CouchDB could be a common platform from big clusters in the cloud to your v

MD5

I wondered if the crypto library used in CouchDB is present as javascript functions for use in design documents. For example, is there a built-in MD5 function or does this need to be added. If it needs to be added as a javascript function, recommendations for what library to use would be apprecia

Re: [PROPOSAL] Officially deprecate CouchDB 1.x.

Joan, thanks for your relentless effort to focus resources on moving 2.x forward. That said, I honestly dont see how this proposal would support your intentions 1) Migration to to 2.x would have happened already if a production ready version was available 2) Leaving 1.x out in the cold will not s

Re: [PROPOSAL] Officially deprecate CouchDB 1.x.

each sit, but I'm > definitely seeing more people on 2.x these days than 1.x, > *significantly* more - both from our informal support channels as > well as through GitHub Issues and requests for paid support. I feel > as a result the time is right to make this proposal. >

Call for "Must-fix" issues

This thread reach out to CouchDB 1.x users to generate a list of "must-fix" issues that is preventing users to upgrade to the latest version of CouchDB. It is in response to Joan's comment below regarding the non-technical proposal to make a project decision to terminate official Apache suppor

Re: [PROPOSAL] Officially deprecate CouchDB 1.x.

-1 A sunsetting discussion is very welcome, but this proposal is unclear, based on week arguments and a lack of data, and as decision support not the best of proposals. 1) To "table" a propoal for voting is problematic --

Re: [PROPOSAL] Officially deprecate CouchDB 1.x.

Thanks for this, Joan You must have put a lot time and effort into this and it is _highly appreciated_. The "official" https://www-us.apache.org/dyn/stats/couchdb.log seems like a nice place to follow the trend. What is in second column, download time? Although it is hard to compile totals out o

Re: [PROPOSAL] Officially deprecate CouchDB 1.x.

h is a far-reaching decision with unclear benefit. Also, I think the result of the recent user survey should be published to support the decision making. Johs > On 7 Jul 2018, at 19:18, Joan Touzet wrote: > > Johs Ensby wrote: >> Thanks for this, Joan >> >> You must h

Re: [PROPOSAL] Officially deprecate CouchDB 1.x.

x. 1.x is a fine piece of software and existing installations > of it will continue to run just fine, but this project is moving on. > > Best > Jan > — > >> On 8. Jul 2018, at 14:59, Johs Ensby wrote: >> >> Thanks Joan, >> >> Your take on the

Re: CouchDB and future

I find Chitan's reflections very interesting, even if the current direction for CouchDB points in a different direction. The problem is that CouchDBs future is difficult to understand, as marketing discussions are discouraged. This is a very good example of how it is done: > Briefly, this mailing

Re: CouchDB and future

Chintan, > On 9 Jul 2019, at 05:50, Chintan Mishra wrote: > >> CouchDB 1.x is no longer supported, even for security updates. > Johs had some interesting points regarding 1.x and their stability. Would you > mind sharing those? CouchDB 1.x can run uninterrupted for years. We used it to create qu

Re: CouchDB and future

Hi Jan I forgot my earlier decision not to meddle. My apologies. Keep up the good work! > On 9 Jul 2019, at 10:02, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > Instead, I’d love to see a PR to the website from you, or a blog post with a > case-study about how you use CouchDB in non-standard ways. Thanks for the invi

Re: CouchDb Rewrite/Fork

Reddy and Joan, > On 10 Jul 2019, at 23:16, Reddy B. wrote: > Thanks Joan, keeping API+ replication protocal compatibility is definitely > the plan New forks/rewrites with API and replication protocal* compatibility would be great news for the user community. *) Fail-proof master-to-master re

Re: [DISCUSS] A direction from a non-contributor

A side comment: I spotted a new term here.. "Rewrite middleware" that coupled with the functionality "Deploying updated middleware" .. is a pointer to the beauty of the mysterious CouchDB design documents. CouchDB allows for the deployment of advanced "middleware" including API modifications,

Re: Proposed deprecations / removals (was: Re: Getting started on CouchDB 3.0, and an introduction)

Much appreciated, Joan You're a hero Johs > On 4 Sep 2019, at 23:37, Joan Touzet wrote: > > Hey Adam, > >> When it comes to deprecating and/or removing functionality, I feel like I >> don’t know exactly where we stand today. We have occasionally described some >> of the CouchApp functionality

Re: Photon 1.9

A while since I clicked the update button on this app, but Wow!! this demontrates the power of couchapps johs (disclosure: long-time Photon fan) > On 6 Sep 2019, at 07:41, ermouth wrote: > > Happy to announce Photon 1.9, new version of alternative CouchDB admin > panel. > > Today Photon celebr

Re: CouchDB data processing endpoints

Hi Joan, > On 7 Sep 2019, at 00:59, Joan Touzet wrote: > More accurately, the current plan is they won't be re-implemented for 4.0, > since the existing implementations won't work in 4.0 against FoundationDB. About the discussions on dropping the functions that make design documents so useful

Re: Couchbase trademark issues

I agree that is very hard to consolidate reliable docs and posts on CouchDB for the time being, however redirecting to old stuff is NOT the solution. A good wiki is the way to go! For the trademark discussion, a consistent use of the name CouchDB should do the trick provided the importance of vi

How can we do business with CouchDB developers?

I have a problem: My javascript developers need som expert help now and then. I wish there was a way to identify experienced CouchDB developers that would be interested in paid ad hoc assignments. My assumption is that some developers that have invested heavily in CouchDB could benefit from off

Re: Important update on couchdb's foundationdb work

Hi, I want to second the statements (Fynn, Ronny and others) that I see as support for option 1 in Jan’s three ways forward: 1. Follow IBM in abandoning FDB-Couch, refocus all effort on Erlang-Couch (3.x). “Follow IBM” in the meaning “staying together and have the benefit of a big brand support

Re: authentication behaviour

Thanks for raising this question, Benoit! Having worked with CouchDB as an all-in-one solution for deploying small web sites and couchapps, the authentication system is the main sources of irritation. How on earth do I make this work? An example: - push the app to a publicly available db so you

Re: The Future

As I am not a contributing developer, but working on commercial use of CouchDB, so my only reason for being on this list is to look out for things like what just happened with Damien; look out for the risk that the CouchDB project stagnates in what Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya calls the 'good eno

Re: CouchDB AJAX interaction

On 12. jan. 2012, at 07:22, boxidilshan wrote: > 5) What are the best libraries for client side to achieve my goal? We found YUI3 a good alternative, but for now only client-side. Deals well with cross domain issues. Yahoo is launching its Mojito/Manhattan platform with node.js, but I can't see

Re: Couchbase trademark issues

The name and logo of couchDB represent a brilliant and unique concept. They are about the only thing that the project has going for itself communications-wise for the time being. To NOT protect these vital assets would be to demonstrate that the project is without leadership. Johs www.linkedin.c

Re: Futon2

it for you. ---- Johs Ensby Business to Web AS Office: Kirkegt. 5, N-0153 Oslo Phone: + 47 22700 007 Mobil: + 47 46 83 79 86 Mail: j...@b2w.com http://twitter.com/ensby http://www.linkedin.com/in/ensby

Re: CouchDB _rewrite

Hi Paul, you're right, Cloudant has SSL connections for clients to the *.cloudant.com domains. and I guess in the context of vhost/_rewrite this could be used for one domain per Cloudant account. It would be nice if Cloudant could offer the opportunity to have SSL certs o

Re: [PROPOSAL] Create des...@couchdb.apache.org mailing list

Good idea, Michelle! One idea that I think could be powerful for a group like this is to explore d3 Data journalism is a strong wave and CouchDB and d3 are a perfect match. It's also showcase Couch in a powerful way outside the DBA group. Other 2D and 3D graphics libraries in JavaScript might al

Re: [PROPOSAL] Create des...@couchdb.apache.org mailing list

Hi, > On 10. sep. 2015, at 16.15, Michelle Phung wrote: > I recently was asked how to render a front end application visualization that > could potentially have millions of data points and could break the client. > My initial response to this was to bin the data, then render it, but as I > thou

Re: [PROPOSAL] Create des...@couchdb.apache.org mailing list

Michelle, Robert and ermouth, I very much agree with ermouth that the old-fashioned email list is not for designers. I don't know why IRC and plain text email stick with developers, but they surely won't build a designer community effficiently. We need to use a social media platform suitable for

Re: “Yes, and…”, not “But…” (Was: [PROPOSAL] Create des...@couchdb.apache.org mailing list)

Thanks for this video, Robert Very interesting, any other input like this that captures knowhow about how to make OSS communities productive and compassionate would be highly appreciated Johs > On 14. sep. 2015, at 19.35, Robert Kowalski wrote: > > I would really recommend this talk which exp

Re: “Yes, and…”, not “But…” (Was: [PROPOSAL] Create des...@couchdb.apache.org mailing list)

ng to know if anyone know of a paper that deals with the difference in values and beliefs in the best OSS teams. Johs > On 15. sep. 2015, at 02.48, Johs Ensby wrote: > > Thanks for this video, Robert > Very interesting, any other input like this that captures knowhow ab

Re: “Yes, and…”, not “But…” (Was: [PROPOSAL] Create des...@couchdb.apache.org mailing list)

Hi Jan, could you share the conclusion on your #1? I would guess #1 and #3 need to work together since it is a bit hard to have one rule for dealing with bad ideas and another for dealing with good ideas. johs > On 15. sep. 2015, at 12.21, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >> 1. we already know how to dea

Re: “Yes, and…”, not “But…” (Was: [PROPOSAL] Create des...@couchdb.apache.org mailing list)

mpossible. > > > [1] > http://bofh.nikhef.nl/events/FOSDEM//2012/maintracks/k.1.105/Caret_and_Stick.webm > [2] http://producingoss.com/ > [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=2&v=7nnAYB1mb9E > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Johs Ensby wrote: > >> Robert

Re: [PROPOSAL] Create an account for designers to contribute to CouchDB

Michelle, suggest Medium account with ... "Email notifications on your content ( We’ll email you when there’s notifications on your stories and publications.)" ... set to design@ to comply with ASF policy as per Alexander's concern Alexander, I support you on encouraging ermouth suggestion to us

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow rewrites to be JS function

Jason, I would like to offer another use case related to "access control" In the userCtx.roles you can store objects created at signup (e.g. via social login) that may be used as shared or individual access keys. Having roles available in _rewrite makes it possible to have one design document as

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow rewrites to be JS function

Hi Jan & PMC, will you welcome ermouths rewrite contribution? Arguments against couchapps has to do with performance and the folly in competing with node.js. Of course it is too late to compete with the node.js ecosystem. That battle was lost in 2010, when couchapps did not evolve beyond the exp

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow rewrites to be JS function

r decline the feature (this will > involve refactoring and changes) > > As Alex said. The PMC or Jan do not decide about the feature. > > All the best > > Andy > On 1 Oct 2015 11:21, "Alexander Shorin" wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Johs Ens

Re: [BLOG] The CouchDB Weekly News, October 1st, is out!

Katharina, you are doing a terrific job makes the community glow:) johs > On 8. okt. 2015, at 17.58, Michelle Phung wrote: > > Katharina! > > I’d like to add my thanks as well. > > It makes me feel connected to the community reading that there are so many > cool and interesting things going

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow rewrites to be JS function

Thanks for going all the way and provide a AMI for testing, ermouth! It's going to be an interesting weekend 3 questions: 1) could you post an examples here for simpel rewrite function with all parameters in use? 2) can you confirm that you now can turn a GET into a PUT and if you need to, redi