rmannibucau commented on issue #660:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/660#issuecomment-616679437
@reta hmm, MP reactive-streams-operators was supposed to redefine (with the
same pitfall that it is no more aligned on what people use on the JVM). Seems
it hasnt be done but the spec
reta commented on issue #660:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/660#issuecomment-616724202
@rmannibucau It certainly makes sense (implementation wise the PR needs some
work, the ForkJoin pool was also on my list but I thought to have TCK tests
first). Yeah, you seem to have more
In the existing `org.apache.cxf.ext.logging.LoggingFeature` implementation it
is possible to segregate the server jaxws/jaxrs logs and It would be nice to
enhance to feature to segregate server/client logs.
Ex: Ideally application can have jaxrs Rest API at the same time it can
have rest-client
coheigea commented on a change in pull request #638:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/638#discussion_r377614476
##
File path: parent/pom.xml
##
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
3.1.4
1.0.12
1.0.4
-20.0
+28.2-jre
Review comment:
coheigea commented on a change in pull request #638:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/638#discussion_r411227776
##
File path: parent/pom.xml
##
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
3.1.4
1.0.12
1.0.4
-20.0
+28.2-jre
Review comment:
reta commented on a change in pull request #638:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/638#discussion_r411340344
##
File path: parent/pom.xml
##
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
3.1.4
1.0.12
1.0.4
-20.0
+28.2-jre
Review comment:
:+1:
coheigea commented on a change in pull request #638:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/638#discussion_r411351629
##
File path: parent/pom.xml
##
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
3.1.4
1.0.12
1.0.4
-20.0
+28.2-jre
Review comment:
+1
andrei-ivanov commented on a change in pull request #638:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/638#discussion_r411349925
##
File path: parent/pom.xml
##
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
3.1.4
1.0.12
1.0.4
-20.0
+28.2-jre
Review comment:
reta commented on issue #660:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/660#issuecomment-616577276
@rmannibucau I found Reactive Streams to be good abstraction, every single
reactive stream implementation supports it (so interop would be the least
concern here I believe), afaik even MP does
